V.R.S.

Don Curzio Nitoglia: Americanist Plot Against the Roman Church

PROLOGUE

After studying the figures of Peter Thiel and Samuel Atman and the role the former played in Rome, in March 2026, especially: 1st) in the conservative Catholic environment, linked to the traditional Mass, (only if normalized by the full acceptance of the Second Vatican Council and the perfect orthodoxy of the Novus Ordo Missae of 1969, in the “Ecclesia Dei” Institutes); 2nd) … Traditional Mass, which was positioned by Thiel within the framework of the “Katekon” (which according to him would be … himself …) to the Antichrist; that is, 3°) in a strange mixture (in the style of Benedict XVI's “hermeneutics of continuity”) of Apostolic Tradition (the Roman Mass, improperly called the Mass of St. Pius V), married not only to the modernism of Vatican II and the new Montinian Mass of 1969 (in “Ecclesia Dei adflicta”), but also to the highly advanced technology of Artificial Intelligence, of Palantir and the pantheistic philosophy of Yuval Noah Harari's Transhumanism.

Well, this seems to me to be the “problem of the present hour.”

In fact, Thiel would like to achieve (like all alchemists, sorcerers, esotericists and Luciferists) immortality thanks to his technological discoveries, which would (hypothetically, according to him) surpass the human; in a certain sense, just as grace (really, for sound theology) surpasses nature.

In fact, Thiel considers AI superior to human intelligence and, therefore, venerates or “worships” it as something magical, superhuman or “divine” in a pantheistic and Luciferian sense, reconnecting scientific technology with Noah Harari's philosophical Transhumanism.

WHY THIS SUMMARY ARTICLE?

For this reason, I'm bringing together in this summary article what I've recently written in more detail on some of these topics, to draw a moral lesson, which is the most important question of the present hour. Namely, what does all this that has just happened before our eyes mean?

In short, how should we react to this unleashing of the forces of evil, which would like to destroy the last "Alcazar", which still persists in refusing to be normalized by the unctuous entryism of the Americanist philanthropic Antichrist wishing to "reconcile the irreconcilable, in the name of the last Council"?

I – PETER THIEL

Peter Thiel is a staunch supporter of Donald Trump (at least during his second term); he is a representative of the "techno/right"; that is, of American conservatism, which seeks to redeem humanity through conservative and elitist technology (we have gone from the Brazilian "coffee elite" to the American "tech elite"), primarily deployed to protect the armies (the US and Israeli, the only truly Western, Atlantic, and democratic ones), who have used it to massacre (democratically and for good) at least 70,000 Palestinians, over 20,000 of whom were children under the age of 12 (not to mention the millions of deaths caused between the 1980s and 2010—including by NATO, also Italy—in Lebanon, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Libya, and Syria...). According to him, anything that opposes technology and technocracy must be outlawed.

In fact, he invites to the "conference on the Antichrist and the "Katekon"" the old radical/Pannellian (a real "big shot" to keep the Antichrist ... from laughing ...) Daniele Capezzone, Antonio Zanardi Landi: the Ambassador to the Holy See of the "Knights of Malta" and the Northern League's Lorenzo Fontana; then he sends the guests to the traditional Mass, even though he is not Catholic and lives with a man (= Matt Danzeisen, American financier, vice president of "BlackRock" since 2017, with whom he had a surrogate child ...).

According to Thiel, democracy is now obsolete and must be replaced by technocracy; therefore, he preaches the advent of the new era of technocratic salvation through dissolution or antinomy (“anti” = against; “nomè” = Law; that is, the violation of Natural Law, as a means of sanctification); in short, the same themes preached by the Kabbalists, especially the Polish and Ukrainian ones of the 18th century: for example, among the most famous, Jacob Frank and Isaac Zevi and, finally, by Julius Evola (The Metaphysics of Sex, Rome, Atanòr, 1958; Riding the Tiger, Milan, Scheiwiller, 1961).

The society of the future, according to Thiel, must be led by technocrats, by highly advanced technology (Artificial Intelligence, with a capital "A") in order to arrive at "Transhumanism" (heralded by Yuval Noah Harari) or "individuation"; that is, becoming "God" with one's own gnosis or technological knowledge and no longer just metaphysical (as the old René Guénon would have wanted, The Crisis of the Modern World, 1927; The King of the World, 1927; Eastern Metaphysics, 1939).

According to Thiel, we have reached the eve of the "apocalypse" (which is not that of St. John the Apostle); we are now living in a twilight era, a sort of inter-regnum, preceding that of the Messiah: Trump/Netanyahu/Thiel (a true "infernal anti-trinity"), who will defeat the Antichrist, perhaps just as the USA is (April 4, 2026) defeating ... Iran...

Of course, the "Messiah" would be none other than him (who else?)... but he won't save us through asceticism, repentance, and conversion; rather, through dissolution (moral, logical, and metaphysical), and therefore he works to hasten it nihilistically. "The worse, the better," "pecca fortiter sed fortius spera" (sin boldly but trust even more boldly).

Thiel's "Palantir" has lately and "strangely" been involved in all espionage operations and especially in war operations and above all in those taking place in the current theatres of bloody wars (Gaza, West Bank, Ukraine, Russia, Iran, Israel and the USA ...).

“Palantir” was born on September 11, 2001, and thanks to the “Patriot Act”, it began to register all of us with the noble intent of preventing Boeing planes from crashing into American skyscrapers, being too high risk of causing numerous “accidents”, especially if they are driven by ultra/fundamentalist but drunk Arabs (“Ratzinger's hermeneutics of continuity [between Islam and breathalyzers]” or Spinoza's “coincidentia oppositorum”) even if, subsequently (2003), they make it possible for America to invade Iraq to steal or rather “export” oil, with the excuse of “importing” democracy.

Thiel has been in contact with Jeffrey Epstein …, the Mossad, various global intelligence agencies, especially the US ones (naturally democratic/conservative).

II – SAM ATMAN

The second character who now enters the picture is Sam Altman, who, like his partner Peter Thiel, got "married" civilly—in Hawaii, it goes without saying—to a man, idem ut supra, (= Oliver Mulherin) in January 2024 (see Corriere della Sera, January 12, 2024) and on January 23, 2025, announced on social media the adoption of a child, already planned a year earlier (see La Repubblica, November 12, 2024). Now, "Thiel's" child was born via surrogate motherhood; however, I don't know how was born the child of Altman, who, despite Artificial Intelligence, is not yet omnipotent and is—at least for the moment—having some difficulty impregnating a man... Therefore, it is likely that the child was also created in a laboratory or (more homemade) via surrogate motherhood.

However, it must at least be admitted that Sam Altman (unlike Peter Thiel) does not claim to be the “Katekon” of the Antichrist and does not organize “Saint Pius V party-mass” in Rome (see Il Sole 24 ORE, 19, January, 2023, Here is who Sam Altman is, the inventor of ChatGPT), in function of the “Benedict Option” as the title of the book by his friend Rod Dreher states (tr. it., Cinisello Balsamo, San Paolo, 2018).

III – ROD DREHER

And here we come to the "third character in search of an author": Rod Dreher. Indeed, the Thiel/Dreher partnership is also worrying; since Dreher has launched the plan to "re-christianize" Europe, but in an Americanized manner, under the aegis of the "new theology" (albeit moderately conservative) of Benedict XVI and no longer under the patristic and traditional theology of St. Benedict of Nursia (too integrally "Roman Catholic"), which merely serves as a facade for Ratzinger/Benedict XVI.

Here lies Dreher's ambiguity: using the name "Benedict" in two diametrically different ways; just as Ratzinger had equivocally used the same term "Tradition" in both a traditional and a modernist manner; wanting to convey the idea of ​​a continuity between two contradictory entities: Benedict of Norcia and Benedict of Marktl in Bavaria, that is, Benedict XVI - Vatican II and Apostolic Tradition (See Francesco Spadafora, La Tradizione contro il Concilio, Rome, Volpe, 1989).

In short, we need to re-establish a "young Europe, with an ancient Mass," possibly dressed in a "Cucinelli look," with a neocon, ultra-liberal, Calvinist/fundamentalist, pro-Zionist perspective, even moderately open to Rotary and Freemasonry, naturally conservative or Anglo/American, ... a completely different thing from the Latin and progressive one...

Thiel's arrival in Rome must be read in this light, which reeks of the CIA, which wants to Americanize Rome – no longer with bombs, as in 1943/44 –, but with liberal-conservative infiltration into the heart of traditional Catholicism, having already infiltrated the Vatican during the Council (1962-65) and the "Ecclesia Dei" Institutes (1983/84), during the "theological Restoration" that took place during the pontificates of Wojtyla (1978-2005) and Ratzinger (2005-2013); a Restoration that suffered a setback during the reign of Bergoglio (2013-2025) and which perhaps should be relaunched (with Thiel's help), financed and sponsored by Trump, under this current Americanist Pontiff Prevost.

IV – CIA & “NOM” PASSING THROUGH THE “MASS-BEAT”

On April 3, 1969, the New Mass of Paul VI was promulgated; while the so-called Beat Masses date back to 1966 (three years before the promulgation of the NOM).

The Liturgia-beat reproduced vaguely religious songs with a strongly and wildly beat-driven rhythm; furthermore, their content was filled with a saccharine and sticky sentimentality that annoyed any well-ordered intellect, preparing it to accept the initially less beat-oriented disgrace of the new Montinian Mass of 1969 (see Aldo Fabrizi's beautiful sketch on "La Messa-beat, la notte di Natale").

And so, on April 27, 1966, in Rome, in the church of Santa Maria in Vallicella, the first Beat Mass was sung and presented to the general public, with television and press coverage... there were thousands of people.

Be careful! The Beat Mass is not the accident of some reckless priest; rather, the Beat Mass was desired (in true "Frankfurt School" style) by the Vatican's upper echelons, who had converted to modernism, and also by US intelligence to ruin the Roman Church.

Now, in this post-pandemic and war juncture (Palestine, Ukraine, Iran ...), which goes from 2019 to 2026, Thiel/Atman/Dreher are trying to carry out the CIA/Morlion project (1943/1966-69) to complete fully the subversion and dissolution of humanity.

Indeed, in this chain of events it is impossible not to see the hand of Intelligence, just as the Bené Berith, that is, Jewish Freemasonry, worked in great secrecy at Vatican II.

FATHER FELIX MORLION

A very important character is Felix Morlion, who deserves careful study; ...now we'll see who he is.

The “Pro Deo” University was a project of the CIA and the OSS, that is, the American military intelligence service.

Father Morlion arrived in Sicily with the American army in '43, landed in Trinacria, destroyed the spirit of Europe and the best was yet to come.

He arrived with the American army in 1943, then from 1943 to 1944 he traveled up half of Italy towards Rome. On June 4, 1944, the Americans entered Rome. Morlion arrived with a letter of introduction from Alcide De Gasperi and Don Sturzo.

Morlion was a very important figure, an expert in psychological warfare techniques and mass propaganda. He was an operative for the American military intelligence service (OSS). With the approval of Monsignor Montini, he founded the "International University of Special Studies" (LUISS) in Rome in 1946. Not yet known as "LUIS," it was the "LUISS," which later became the "Luis-Luigi Carli" of Confindustria (the Italian employers' federation). So, we move from the Clergy to Confindustria. LUISS was also called "Pro Deo." Morlion founded it with Vittorio Valletta, who became the director of Fiat during Giovanni Agnelli's reign. Valletta was a famous Freemason.

Today, LUISS is called “Luis-Guido Carli”, and it is the University of Confindustria, which reconciles (against the Gospel and according to Vatican II) God and Mammon.

V- THE LAST AMERICANIST ASSAULT

We are witnessing, especially with the "Thiel conference on the Antichrist" and the participation of his fans in the traditional Mass at the "Trinity of Pilgrims," ​​an unnoticed theological shift from the traditional/conservative world toward technologically transhumanist Americanism, which goes beyond Vatican II and Montini's "NOM." In short, something terribly timely, dangerous, and diabolically deceptive.

Indeed, especially after the “tornado of Trump”, who is also seen by “extreme conservatives” as the “new Charlemagne or Saint Benedict (post-Ratzinger, Benedict XVI)”, restorer of neo-Christianity, which would go from the Atlantic to Israel, naturally from the perspective of Judeo/Christianity and the “Elder Brothers” (from “Nostra aetate”, 1965 to John Paul II/Benedict XVI, 2005/13).

Unfortunately, the intention to find a way out of the circumstances of today's very sad times reflects that of the naive person who accepts an insidious "outstretched hand" (from Trump/Thiel/Prevost), without realizing that that hand will then lead him across the Rubicon into error and injustice (Card. Alfredo Ottaviani, Duties of the State towards the Church, Rome, 1952).

Today, in fact, the hand is being extended to that part of traditional Roman Catholicism, which escaped the tsunami of Vatican II, by an Americanism updated with a pinch of theo-conservatism (which was already condemned by Leo XIII, in Testem benevolentiae nostrae, 1899) and which now (2026) speaks openly of itself (Thiel) as if it were the “Katèkon” or “the obstacle” that will stop “the Beast that rises from the sea”, whose name is “666”, that is, the final Antichrist.

Today's outstretched hand, in short, is one that seems to have apparently abandoned its hatred towards the Apostolic Tradition; indeed, it is now dressed in a glove of saccharine philanthropy and pacifist words.

Anti-Christian philanthropists seem willing to grant Tradition (as long as it remains in the sacristy) at least a practical (typically American) tolerance or a "meta-historical" or "meta-physical" compromise; since it is projected toward a New World Order, founded on Trans/humanism and Artificial Intelligence, in which man will finally become like God through his own strength and that of the machines or microchips of the likes of Noah Harari, Peter Thiel, and Elon Musk.

Unfortunately, the same refrain that Catholics and various progressives of yesterday uttered about socialism is now being heard among today's "conservatives": "Finally, a political/religious power with a 'human face': Trump/Thiel! How can we reject their 'outstretched hand' to conservative/Tradition and their 'meta-historical compromise' with neo-traditional/conservatism, which even invites those who listen to Thiel's words about the Antichrist to attend traditional Mass with a 'pass' around their necks?"

Pius XII warned us shortly before his death: "Let none of you become a deserter." Indeed, fearing accusations of wanting to return to the Middle Ages or remain in the "ghetto," some of our people no longer feel like maintaining their doctrinal positions, which today are politically and theologically incorrect.

Let us instead adhere to the warning of Leo XIII, who, recommending harmony and unity in fighting error, added: "... and here we must be on our guard not to allow ourselves to connive with error, or to oppose it with a weaker resistance than the truth allows."

In short, true Catholics, fully committed to the divine/apostolic Tradition, who know they are in secure possession of the truth and justice revealed by God and transmitted by Christ's Apostles, do not compromise or seek to dilute Christianity. They demand full respect for their rights, which are those of God.

Those who, however, feel uncertain of their possession of the truth (because they are tired or naive) are unable to hold the field alone. This is the trap of the "historical/theological" or "meta-historical" compromise, which is the acceptance of dialogue with Americanist modernity (presented to us, despite the wars unleashed almost uninterruptedly by the United States—for over two hundred years—in every part of the world, as the only democratic bulwark, along with Israel—despite the massacres and final genocide of Zionism spanning 1948 to 2026—that would stand against the "antidemocratic barbarism" of Palestine, Russia, and Persia, which is considered the "absolute evil of today"), initiated by John XXIII, conducted only with mercy, or rather with surrender, and without justice, that is, without refuting the errors and horrors of the modern and contemporary world.

Instead, “The Catholic Church insists on the principle that truth must prevail over error and that true religion, when it is known, must be aided in its spiritual mission in preference to religions whose message is more or less deficient and in which error is mixed with truth.”

A practical agreement with Americanism (especially if it is “conservative” and “right-wing”, as would be the Trumpian one of Thiel, apparently much more “conservative” than those of Reagan and Bush) would inevitably lead little by little 1°) not only to locking Tradition in the sacristy – with the official recognition of ascetic/political modernism (condemned by Testem benevolentiae, 1899; Graves de communi re, 1903; Notre charge apostolique, 1910), as happened to the American Indians locked up in reservations and regularly recognized, as long as they limit themselves to being extras in a past that was alive and today is only folklore – but also 2°) to falling into the clutches of the New World Order, which does not resign itself to losing its political and economic world primacy and wants to overthrow Christian Russia (even if Orthodox) by first passing through Iran, after having taken possession of its oil immediately after that of Venezuela and Greenland's waters but is so essential for "computer science" and artificial intelligence.

VI – WHAT LESSON CAN WE LEARN FROM ALL THIS?

We are witnessing, especially with the “Thiel conference on the Antichrist” together with the participation of his fans in the traditional Mass at the “Trinity of Pilgrims”, an unnoticed theological transshipment towards technologically transhumanist Americanism and implicitly towards the Kingdom of the final Antichrist.

In short, we are once again trying to reconcile neo-modernism with Tradition, in the light of Benedict XVI and his "'hermeneutic of continuity' always affirmed, but never proven" (as Monsignor Brunero Gherardini has instead demonstrated).

Indeed, some (the “extreme neoconservatives”) are trying to mistake their desires for reality and see in Trump and the spirit of Benedict XVI, the restorer of neo-Christianity, who would reach from the Atlantic to Israel.

Anti-Christian philanthropists seem willing to grant the dogmatic/liturgical Apostolic Tradition at least a practical (typically American) tolerance or a "meta-historical" and "meta-physical" compromise; since it is projected toward a New World Order, founded on Trans/humanism and Artificial Intelligence, in which man will finally become like God through his own strength and that of the machines or microchips of the likes of Noah Harari, Peter Thiel, Sam Atman, and Elon Musk.

VII – CONCLUSION

In conclusion, one wonders if something good can emerge from this order of things, so typical of Americanism, even if it were corrected by the "right," that is, by "Trump-philosophy" and "Thiel-technology"?

Certainly, "God can raise up children for Abraham even from stones" (Luke, III, 8; Matthew, III, 9), being omnipotent; but, normally, He lets secondary causes act, that is, the human being, and then intervenes with His "Grace, which presupposes nature, does not destroy it but perfects it" (S. Th., I, q. 1, a. 8, ad 2).

After examining the doctrine of Thiel, one of the main leaders of the pro-Trump American “right” movement, who defines himself as “American national/post-liberal neo-conservatism”, it seems to me that it is very difficult to see in Trump/Thielism or paleo/Americanist conservatism a life raft for the poor world that is going to pieces like the “Titanic” and that can only be restored by Divine Omnipotence, which however also wants to make use of secondary causes, to the extent that they are willing to cooperate with the grace of God, certainly not with “unnatural unions”, which deny both 1°) the “speculative principle of identity and moral synderesis”: “Good is good, evil is evil, evil is not good” (Principle of Non-Contradiction: Hermeneutics of Continuity between Tradition and Vatican II); let 2°) the Synderesis: “Good is evil, evil is good, one must do evil and flee from good” (the desired and propagated homosexual union of Thiel and Atman).

Indeed, what stability could a political movement have that wasn't anchored in solid philosophical (political/economic) and theological (dogmatic and moral) principles? It would seem more like a house built on sand or the rough waves of the sea, rather than on rock.

It would be enough to study the Trump/Thiel plan for Gaza; furthermore, Trump even boasted that his son-in-law Jared Kushner converted his daughter to Lubavitcher Judaism.

Trump's main benefactor or financier is Miriam Adelson, a billionaire with a $60 billion empire. A staunch Zionist, she donated more than $100 million to Trump for his last election campaign (see The Times of Israel, October 17, 2024). J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio have also been funded by US Jewish lobbies.

Certainly with these principles (and the origin of these dollars: “If I give something to you, you then give something to me!”) you won’t get very far, even if you are accompanied or remotely controlled by “Palantir”, which – if it sees everything – still can’t do everything and then depends on the donors of dollars like a drug addict on the pusher (“do ut des”).

A lasting edifice cannot be built on the ever-changing, shifting wave of contradiction in principle; it must be built only on the stable and permanent rock of being in act (“Ego sum qui sum” - I am who am).

NOTES

1 Cf. Maurizio Blondet, Gli Adelphi della dissoluzione, Milan, Ares, 1994; Gershom Scholem, Sabbetai Sevi. The Mystical Messiah, 1973, Italian tr., Turin, Einaudi, 2001; Arthur Mandel, The Militant Messiah: The Story of Jacob Frank and the Frankists, 1979, Italian tr., Milan, Arké, 1989.
2 Cf. Léon de Poncins, The Problem of the Jews at the Second Vatican Council, Rome, 1962, self-published; Emanuel Ratier, Mysteries and Secrets of the B'nai B'rith, Verrua Savoia, CLS, 1994; Maurice Pinay, Plot Against the Church, Rome, 1962, self-published, reprint. Proceno, Effedieffe, 2015.
3 Leo XIII, Encyclical Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885.
4 Jacques Maritain, The Rights of Man and Natural Law, Italian trans., Vita e Pensiero, Milan 1977, p. 24.
5 Brunero Gherardini, Second Vatican Ecumenical Council. A Discourse to Be Given, Frigento, Casa Mariana Editrice, 2009; Tradidi quod et accepi. Tradition, Life and Youth of the Church, Frigento, Casa Mariana Editrice, 2010; Second Vatican Council. The Failed Discourse, Turin, Lindau, 2011; Quaecumque dixero vobis. The Word of God and Tradition Compared with History and Theology, Turin, Lindau, 2011; La Cattolica. Outlines of Augustinian Ecclesiology, Turin, Lindau, 2011.
6 Miriam Adelson was born in Tel Aviv in 1945. She is an Israeli/American doctor and philanthropist (of course, it couldn't have been otherwise... philanthropy is in fashion, if you don't have it, you'll be repudiated). She inherited a huge fortune from her husband, casino magnate Sheldon Adelson (died 2021). She is one of the richest women in the world and is a fervent supporter of Israel and Trump, to the extent that he also supports the Zionist state. Miriam is considered one of the most influential figures in US/Israel relations.
17289

Do you agree ?
12.04.2026
POPE LEO INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II SCHISMATICALLY WITH THE LG 16 VISIBLE HERESY : CHANGES THE CREEDS AT HOLY MASS
Pope Francis did not tell Fr. Stefano Mannelli F.I that Vatican Council II supports Tradition.Pope Leo does not tell the SSPX that Cardinal Fernandez is in schism.
A nihil obstat and imprimatur are needed for Karl Rahner's books but also that of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger published by Igantius Press.

Why go for Pope Leo’s Holy Mass when he has changed the understanding of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms and no cardinal, bishop or priest can defend him?
Any journalist an confirm that with the LG 16 visible mistake, Pope Leo’s understanding of the Athanasius, Nicene and Apostles Creed is not the same as it was for the saints Augustine and Aquinas. There is also a rupture with the dogma extra cclesiam nulla salus of the Magisterium of the 16th century, for example. There is a schismatic break with the Magisterium of the Middle Ages.
On abortion, Pope Leo has said that ‘the teaching is still the same’ there is no change in doctrine. But on the Creeds the teaching is not the same for him and the popes from Pius XII. They have made the LG 16 visible mistake.
I wish someone could correct me. I am just a layman with no academic degrees in theology and philosophy and Pope Leo’s knowledge of the Church is far superior to mine.I was in two seminaries and a university in Rome and had to leave because of doctrine. I studied at a Catholic Institute of Theology in Karachi and taught Church History at the Minor Seminary in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. I noticed that the teaching in general was false. This false teaching has been part of Pope Leo’s religious formation in Chicago.
The teachings of the Catholic Church do not change for me and neither does objective reality - Heaven, Hell and Purgatory.
The discovery of mine is that Pope Leo uses the fake LG 16 reasoning, which produces a new theology, which is nontraditional, schismatic, dishonest and not Catholic.
He confuses what is implicit as being explicit and then produces a liberal conclusion. This is done in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
This error is there in Karl Rahner’s book, The Christian of the Future. It comprises talks Rahner gave in Germany in 1965.
This mistake is there throughout the world in the books on Vatican Council II published by Ignatius, Amazon, Angelus and the Oxford University Press.
With the LG 16 invisible theology the Catholic Church returns to the past as it is the liberals who are in schism.
Pope Francis did not tell Fr. Stefano Mannellis f.i about this when he closed down the Franciscans of the Immaculate seminary in Rome. Pope Leo is not telling the SSPX that it is Cardinal Fernandez who really is in schism. – Lionel Andrades
11. 04.2026
HOW CAN POPE LEO BE THE POPE?
HOW CAN POPE LEO BE THE POPE ?

So there is no denial here. Don Curzio Nitoglia interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. He does the same with the Catechisms. This is political- left.

V.R.S.

1. He is right so there is nothing left of the alleged orthodoxy of Vatican II.
And heterodoxy and irrationality must be denounced no matter where it comes from.
2. The present political "left" and "right" are just two sides - head and tail of the same false coin. Conservatives trying to conserve the decay and progressives wishing to speed it up.

In the graphics above Don Nitroglia interprets 'the red as being an exception for the blue'? For me it is not. So he is irrational. Would you agree ?
It is common among the traditionalists. They all make the same error.

V.R.S.

1. No, I do not agree as Don Curzio nowhere in the above text relates to the baptism of desire controversy.
2. The baptism of desire question is just one factor that may have influenced false ecclesiology and false ecumenism of Vatican II.
For example, Gaudium et spes 22 false proposition that Christ by His Incarnation united in some way with every human being (which Fr. B. Gherardini justly described as "metaphysical nonsense") has nothing to do with baptism of desire controversy (including the so-called implicit desire of baptism)
Similarly, Nostra Aetate 2 proposal that false religions preserve truth and holiness has nothing to do with it.
The same is for example with Unitatis Redintegratio 3 proposal that heretical sects are means of salvation under the Spirit of Christ (i.e. Holy Spirit).

I am referring to the baptism of desire being visible or invisible. It is there before you in red. Is Lumen Gentium 16, the reference to being saved in invincible ignorance a visible or invisible case of you this month ?. It is invisible for me. I cannot meet any saved as such. Neither can you. Would you agree ?
So the baptism of desire as to be an invisible case for us humans. If it is invisible can it be an objective exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus this month ? Are there any objective exceptions for you.?

If you check the graphics on my channel on Gloria TV you can see that there are two interpretations of the Catechisms. Irrational or rational.

V.R.S.

In Lumen Gentium 16 there is a nearly blasphemous statement that Mohammedans pray together with Catholics to one God and false statement that they keep the faith of Abraham. The above has also nothing to do with implicit desire/invisible baptism/invincible ignorance and other aspects of baptism of desire controversy.

You have not answered the question or commented upon my statement. In the graphics the passages in red are hypothetical cases and the passages in blue orthodox cases. The passages in blue are aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442 and the hypothetical and invisible passages in red cannot be explicit exceptions for the dogma EENS or AG 7 .

V.R.S.

I do not care about Ad Gentes 7 - "Vatican II" is heterodox and favoring heresies even without that line.

Ivan Tomas

If sheldon andelson was a jew then he should not have a sign of cross before the year of his death.
Thanks for sharing.

V.R.S.

"Thiel has not just offered financial backing to Vance but introduced him to the ideas of Catholic philosopher René Girard, which influenced Vance’s conversion to Catholicism"
Peter Thiel’s secret lectures on Antichrist in …
"Around the same time, I attended a talk at our law school with Peter Thiel. This was 2011, and Thiel was a well-known venture capitalist but hardly a household name. He would later blurb my book and become a good friend, but I had no idea what to expect at the time. He spoke first in personal terms: arguing that we were increasingly tracked into cutthroat professional competitions. We would compete for appellate clerkships, and then Supreme Court clerkships. We would compete for jobs at elite law firms, and then for partnerships at those same places. At each juncture, he said, our jobs would offer longer work hours, social alienation from our peers, and work whose prestige would fail to make up for its meaninglessness. He also argued that his own world of Silicon Valley spent too little time on the technological breakthroughs that made life better—those in biology, energy, and transportation—and too much on things like software and mobile phones. Everyone could now tweet at each other, or post photos on Facebook, but it took longer to travel to Europe, we had no cure for cognitive decline and dementia, and our energy use increasingly dirtied the planet. He saw these two trends—elite professionals trapped in hyper-competitive jobs, and the technological stagnation of society—as connected. If technological innovation were actually driving real prosperity, our elites wouldn’t feel increasingly competitive with one another over a dwindling number of prestigious outcomes.
Peter’s talk remains the most significant moment of my time at Yale Law School. He articulated a feeling that had until then remained unformed: that I was obsessed with achievement in se—not as an end to something meaningful, but to win a social competition. My worry that I had prioritized striving over character took on a heightened significance: striving for what? I didn’t even know why I cared about the things I cared about. I fancied myself educated, enlightened, and especially wise about the ways of the world—at least compared with most of the people from my hometown. Yet I was obsessed with obtaining professional credentials—a clerkship with a federal judge and then an associate position at a prestigious firm—that I didn’t understand. I hated my limited exposure to legal practice. I looked to the future, and realized that I’d been running a desperate race where the first prize was a job I hated.
I began immediately planning for a career outside the law, which is why I spent less than two years after graduation as a practicing attorney. But Peter left me with one more thing: he was possibly the smartest person I’d ever met, but he was also a Christian. He defied the social template I had constructed—that dumb people were Christians and smart ones atheists. I began to wonder where his religious belief came from, which led me to René Girard, the French philosopher whom he apparently studied under at Stanford. Girard’s thought is rich enough that any effort to summarize will fail to do the man justice. His theory of mimetic rivalry—that we tend to compete over the things that other people want—spoke directly to some of the pressures I experienced at Yale. But it was his related theory of the scapegoat—and what it revealed about Christianity—that made me reconsider my faith"
How I Joined the Resistance

The Seven Thinkers and Groups That Have Shaped …

V.R.S.

"Christ is the scapegoat who reveals our imperfections, and forces us to look at our own flaws rather than blame our society’s chosen victims."

ANDRADES
@andrades_l15298
08.04.2026 CARDINALS FERNANDEZ, LADARIA, O’MALLEY, BISHOP LIBASCI AND FR. LAIRE LIKE CARDINAL RATZINGER INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II UNETHICALLY AND SCHISMATICALLY CARDINALS FERNANDEZ, LADARIA, O’MALLEY, BISHOP …

Don Curzio Nitoglia interprets Vatican Council II irrationally. If he interpreted Vatican Council II rationally he would be politically incorrect with those whom he mentions in this article. He would be a Feeneyite traditionalist. Now he is a Cushingite traditionalist. Cushingism, when you study it is schismatic. His interpretation of Vatican Council II is as schismatic as that of Cardinal Razinger and Pope Leo.

V.R.S.

1. There was only one Vatican Ecumenical Council.
2. Conciliabulum 1962-65 was irrational, revolutionary and heterodox, even schismatic in some of its documents. Thus, it cannot be interpreted rationally, traditionally and in an orthodox way.

2 minutes ago
1. There was only one Vatican Ecumenical Council.
Lionel : Yes.
2. Conciliabulum 1962-65 was irrational, revolutionary and heterodox, even schismatic in some of its documents.
Lionel: Not the Council per se.
If you interpret the Council confusing what is implicit as being explicit it emerges schismatic, without the hermeneutic of continuity.
But if you interpret the Council rationally, by looking at what is implicit as being just implicit, then it is traditional, ecclesiocentric and orthodox. It has a hermeneutic of continuity and is not schismatic. Don Niroglia like the SSPX is schismatic. He chooses the schismatic version of the Council.

Thus, it cannot be interpreted rationally, traditionally and in an orthodox way.
Lionel : Yes it can : when Ad Gentes 7 is aligned with the dogma EENS and the rest of Tradition and hypothetical cases of LG 8,14,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 are not explicit exceptions for AG 7 or the dogma EENS in 1965-2026.
RATZINGER FOLLOWED RAHNER’S FACTUAL ERROR WHICH PRODUCES SCHISM AND CALLS FOR AUTOMATIC EXCOMMUNICATION: HE DID NOT TELL THE CHURCH ABOUT A RATIONAL AND NON SCHISMATIC ALTERNATIVE

RATZINGER FOLLOWED RAHNER’S FACTUAL ERROR WHICH …
21.10.2025
CARDINAL VICTOR MANUEL FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM WITH THE FAKE INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II : 93 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ( UPDATED)

CARDINAL VICTOR MANUEL FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM …
02.08.2025
ARCHBISHOP VICTOR FERNANDEZ DOES NOT QUALIFY TO BE THE PREFECT OF THE DICASTERY FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, VATICAN : HIS OATH OF OFFICE IS BASED UPON IRRATIONAL
ARCHBISHOP VICTOR FERNANDEZ DOES NOT QUALIFY TO …
17.03.2026
WITH LG 16 INVISIBLE FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM. WITH LG 16 VISIBLE PAGLIARANI IS IN SCHISM. POPE LEO MUST CHOOSE
WITH LG 16 INVISIBLE FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM. …
31.10.2025
LUMEN GENTIUM 14 AND LUMEN GENTIUM 16 ARE HYPOTHETICAL: FERNANDEZ WAS IN SCHISM AND NOT VIGANO’S TRADITION: A RE –TRIAL IS NEEDED BY POPE LEO

LUMEN GENTIUM 14 AND LUMEN GENTIUM 16 ARE …
18.03.2026
IGNATIUS PRESS LG 16 ERROR : CARDINALS FERNANDEZ AND SARAH ARE ALSO IN SCHISM.
IGNATIUS PRESS LG 16 ERROR : CARDINALS FERNANDEZ …
0.09.2025
WHEN I SAY CARDINAL FERNANDEZ AND POPE LEO ARE IN PUBLIC SCHISM I REFER TO MAGISTERIAL TEXTS WHICH THEY DO NOT ACCEPT OR INTERPRET IRRATIONALLY
WHEN I SAY CARDINAL FERNANDEZ AND POPE LEO ARE …
05.11.2025
L’OSSERVATORE ROMANO, CIVILITA CATTOLICA AGREE WITH AI ON ‘X’ : POPE LEO IS IN SCHISM WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL.
L’OSSERVATORE ROMANO, CIVILITA CATTOLICA AGREE …
03.01.2025
Pope FRANCIS, CARD. FERNANDEZ AND MSGR.KENNEDY INTERPRETED VATICAN COUNCIL II UNETHICALLY DURING THE VIGANO-SCHISM TRIAL: POPE LEO MUST CORRECT THE INJUSTICE

POPE FRANCIS, CARD. FERNANDEZ AND MSGR.KENNEDY …
21 May 2025
Addressing Misinterpretations of Vatican Council II and Its Impact on Catholic Doctrine in Texas

Addressing Misinterpretations of Vatican Council …
07.02.2026
WHEN VATICAN COUNCIL II IS INTERPRETED WITH THE RATIONAL PREMISE CARD. FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM AND AUTOMATICALLY EXCOMMUNICATED
WHEN VATICAN COUNCIL II IS INTERPRETED WITH THE …
22.02.2025
VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ALIGNED WITH FEENEYITE EENS : WHEN CARD. FERNADEZ ACCEPTS THIS HE BECOMES A TRADITIONALIST
VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ALIGNED WITH FEENEYITE …
POPE LEO IS IRRATIONAL ON THE CREEDS, COUNCILS AND CATECHISMS : RE-TRIAL FOR VIGANO NEEDED
POPE LEO IS IRRATIONAL ON THE CREEDS, COUNCILS …
04.03.2026
CARDINAL FERNANDEZ IS STILL NOT INFORMING THE SSPX : WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL THE COUNCIL IS TRADITIONAL AND NOT LIBERAL

CARDINAL FERNANDEZ IS STILL NOT INFORMING THE …
21.02.2026
· FERNANDEZ AND PAGLIARANI AVOID DOCTRINAL TALKS WITH LG 16 HYPOTHETICAL AND INVISIBLE : VATICAN COUNCIL II WOULD BE ALIGNED WITH FEENEYITE EENS

FERNANDEZ AND PAGLIARANI AVOID DOCTRINAL TALKS …
The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican made an objective and factual error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II during the trial of Archbishop Vigano
The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, …
10.03.2025
POPE LEO AND THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS AGREE WITH ME : VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ALIGNED WITH THE ROMAN MISSAL OF THE LATIN MASS

POPE LEO AND THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS AGREE …
12.02.2025
IF THE VATICAN AND THE SSPX ACCEPTED THE RATIONAL PREMISE TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II THEY BOTH WOULD BE FEENEYITE TRADITIONALISTS. (Views on X with my commehts)

IF THE VATICAN AND THE SSPX ACCEPTED THE …
28.07.2025
POPE LEO AND CARDINAL FERNANDEZ NEED TO AFFIRM THE ATHANASIUS CREED WHICH IS NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL, RATIONAL

POPE LEO AND CARDINAL FERNANDEZ NEED TO AFFIRM …
08.01.2026
POPE LEO AND THE CONSISTORY MUST NOT INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II DECEPTIVELY FOR POLITICAL REASONS . THE COUNCIL IS TRADTIIONAL

POPE LEO AND THE CONSISTORY MUST NOT INTERPRET …
30.12.2025
FERNANDEZ, LIBASSI AND LAIRE ESCAPE A DECREE OF PROHIBITIONS AND PRECEPTS BY BEING DISHONEST : THEY COERCED THE SLAVES OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY IN NH

FERNANDEZ, LIBASSI AND LAIRE ESCAPE A DECREE OF …
FISICHELLA AND SPADERO ARE ALIGNED WITH ST. FRANCIS XAVIER WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL
FISICHELLA AND SPADERO ARE ALIGNED WITH ST. …
12.02.2026
WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IN HARMONY WITH FEENEYITE TRADITION THE SSPX ACCEPTS THE COUNCIL FOR CANONICAL RECOGNITION AND CONSECRATING BISHOPS : THE VATICAN CONDITION IS MET

WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IN HARMONY WITH …
6TH July 2025. Feast of Our Lady of Mount Carmel
TRADITIONIS CUSTODE IS CUSHINGITE BUT VATICAN COUNCIL II IS FEENEYITE. APOSTOLIC VISITORS MUST BE FEENEYITE. POPE LEO’S HOLY MASS IS NOT FEENEYITE BUT CONTROVERSIAL AS HIS ELECTION BY A CUSHINGITE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS.

TRADITIONIS CUSTODE IS CUSHINGITE BUT VATICAN …
23.03.2026
PENDING CANONICAL ISSUES – 4
The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith / Ecclesia Dei must begin a dialogue with the sedevacantists

PENDING CANONICAL ISSUES – 4 The Dicastery for …
ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE AND FR. LEONARD FEENEY WERE CORRECT. THE CDF ( HOLY OFFICE) WERE POLITICAL. POPE LEO XIV MUST CORRECT THE OBJECTIVE MISTAKE.
ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE AND FR. LEONARD FEENEY WERE …
11.01.2025
NATIONAL CATHOLIC REPORTER, SSPX ALIGNED ON VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS : RATIONAL PREMISE UNITES

NATIONAL CATHOLIC REPORTER, SSPX ALIGNED ON …
18.02.2026
LEFEBVRE AND BISHOPS FELLAY AND GALARRETA DID NOT KNOW ABOUT LG-16 INVISIBLE : SSPX MUST CONFIRM

LEFEBVRE AND BISHOPS FELLAY AND GALARRETA DID …
Pope Leo, Cardinal Fernandez and Sergio Mattarella interpret Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise : no denial from the Quirinale or the Holy See Press Office.
Pope Leo, Cardinal Fernandez and Sergio …