72 years . Baptised as an infant. Catholic ancestors go back to Goa. Urban hermit. Discoverer of The Rational Premise and VC2 rational and irrational. Break for trads.Discovered late in life that with LG 16 visible we get the New Theology and with LG 16 invisible we return to the Scholastic theology on EENS etc.
March 17. St. Patrick. Baptised at St. Patrick's Cathedral. Studied at St. Patrick's School,Graduated from St. Patrick's College, Karachi. Irish missionaries!
Eldest son of Luke and Maggie Andrades.Completed semesters in theology , with exams and credit points, at the National Catholic Institute of Theology, Karachi.
Studied Philosophy at the University Pontificia Regina Apostoloum, Rome. Final semester left. Also attended corses in Theology and Latin.
Seminarian at the Pontificial Maria Mater Ecclesia seminary ( 2002) of the Legion of Christ and the English Beda Pontifical College ( seminary) Rome ( 2023).
Holder of the All Pakistan Newspaper Society (APNS) Best Reporter of the Year Award presented at an event for journalists, in Karachi, by Benazir Bhutto.
SEDEVACANTISM BASED UPON VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL IS NOW OBSOLETE. THE COUNCIL CAN BE INTERPRETED RATIONALLY AND THE CONCUSION IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC AND TRADITIONAL.
Catholic lay man in Rome. Discoverer of Feeneyism versus Cushingism, the Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II, a breakthrough for the present Catholic Church.The sedevacantists reject the pope because of Vatican Council II irrational. When the Council is rational it supports Tradition. There is no reason for them to reject the Council or the pope. Even the SSPX can now accept Vatican Council II , rational, and meet the demand that they accept the Council. The Council is in harmony with Tradition. So they can ask for canonical recognition. They can also demand that Pope Leo XIV interpret Vatican Council II rationally, since this is ethical and that he also accept Tradition, as did Pope Leo XIII. The main line Catholic Church must now be traditional since the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms can only be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional.
POPE LEO WAS ELECTED BY CARDINALS WHO INTERPRETED THE CREEDS NON APOSTOLICALLY : OFFICIAL SCHISM.
17.07.2026
POPE LEO WAS ELECTED BY CARDINALS WHO INTERPRETED THE CREEDS NON APOSTOLICALLY : OFFICIAL SCHISM.
Canonical petitions must mention a state of emergency when the College of Cardinals, interpret the Nicene Creed, irrationally and schismatically and then elect Pope Leo who does the same. The irrational interpretation of the Nicene and Athanasius Creed, is a rupture with the centuries – old understanding. This is reported all over the Internet. There is no comment from the Dicastery for Communications, Vatican.
Pope Leo is also in heresy and schism when he uses the Irrational instead of Rational Approach to interpret Vatican Council II. He does not state that the Council, indicates all Jews and Muslims, in general, are oriented to Hell without faith and baptism ( AG 7, CCC 846 etc).Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Council of Florence 1442. While hypothetical and physically invisible cases…Altro
ALL TRADITIONALIST CANONICAL APPEALS MUST BEGIN WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL ONLY.
16.07.2026
ALL TRADITIONALIST CANONICAL APPEALS MUST BEGIN WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL ONLY.
With Vatican Council II rational (Feeneyite) Pope Leo, Cardinal Fernandez, the SSPX bishops and Archbishop Vigano have a common and traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II.
The SSPX-Vigano schism label is based upon an obsolete and irrational version of Vatican Council II, held by the DDF and Pope Leo,
With Vatican Council II rational liberalism is made obsolete and schismatic. With Vatican Council II irrational, Tradition is made obsolete.
The SSPX-Vigano schism label based upon Vatican Council II liberal and irrational is now obsolete, since we can interpret the Council rationally and the conclusion is dogmatic, ecclesiocentric and traditional. The interpretation of Vatican Council II by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), Vatican is now obsolete. The Council is aligned with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the St. Benedict Centers in the USA. …Altro
POPE LEO AGREES WITH ME WHEN LG 16 IS INVISIBLE: VC2 IS THE SAME FOR ALL
15.07.2026
POPE LEO AGREES WITH ME WHEN LG 16 IS INVISIBLE: VC2 IS THE SAME FOR ALL
Pope Leo agrees with me. He has to say that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc refer to invisible and hypothetical cases and are not practical exceptions for Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( EENS), of the Council of Florence 1442.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic (AG 7/EENS) and ecclesiocentric (AG 7/EENS). It is aligned with the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of the Latin Mass.
Vatican Council II has continuity and not break with Tradition (EENS etc).
We have unity in the whole Church. The excommunicated SSPX bishops are in doctrinal unity on Vatican Council II ( LG 16 invisible) with Cardinal Fernandez and Archbishop Kennedy, when LG 14,16 etc are hypothetical and invisible in 2026. The division ends. The liberalism falls off.
The Vatican, SSPX, sedevacantists and cardinals Fernandez and Ladaria are united on the Creeds, Councils and …Altro
Pope Leo is aligned with the SSPX Declaration of Catholic Faith since Vatican Council II is dogmatic and ecclesiocentric when he interprets it rationally
14.07.2026
Pope Leo is aligned with the SSPX Declaration of Catholic Faith since Vatican Council II is dogmatic and ecclesiocentric when he interprets it rationally
Cardinal Fernandez is aligned with the SSPX , the Archdiocese of Washington, the Diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire and the Franciscans and Dominicans on Vatican Council II, interpreted rationally. We have coherence in doctrine and theology in the Church. The division has ended.
Pope Leo is in harmony with the SSPX Profession of Faith, when he interprets Vatican Council II rationally and so traditionally.
We now have coherence in doctrine .The SSPX is aligned with the new bishops of Washington.
LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are always hypothetical. This is common sense. All agree here.
The Missionaries of Charity Contemplative Brothers of Mother Teresa, when they interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally, they would agree doctrinally with Pope Leo, the SSPX and the Archdiocese …Altro
Having Prevost agree with you does not speak well of him or you. Prevost is a strange bird given to certain excitements. Every day I plead with the Deity to end his existence,
POPE LEO AGREES WITH ME: AG 7 IS ALIGNED WITH EENS . LG 16 IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR EITHER.VC2 IS DOGMATIC (AG 7/EENS) AND ECCLESIOCENTRIC (AG7/EENS).
13.07.2026
POPE LEO AGREES WITH ME: AG 7 IS ALIGNED WITH EENS . LG 16 IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR EITHER. VC2 IS DOGMATIC (AG 7/EENS) AND ECCLESIOCENTRIC (AG7/EENS).
Pope Leo is aligned doctrinally with the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012.
ONE QUESTION
The pope would agree with the traditionalists. He has to be asked only one question. His reply will be “Yes”. Pope Leo simply has to be asked, “Does Lumen Gentium 16 (being saved in invincible ignorance) refer to a hypothetical and invisible case in 2026?” He will reply, “Yes”.
Ask any cardinal the same question .The answer will always be, yes. Ask even a non Catholic or non Christian the same question. The answer will be an obvious-yes.
He cannot meet or see someone now in Heaven saved without faith and baptism and instead in invincible ignorance.
A journalist would clarify, , “Holy Father, when Vatican Council II refers to being saved in invincible ignorance ( I.I ) and the baptism of desire (LG 14), the reference is to a hypothetical …Altro
POPE LEO, CARDINAL FERNANDEZ AND THE NEW BISHOPS IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON ARE NOT MAGISTERIAL AND APOSTOLIC ON THE CREEDS, COUNCILS AND CATECHISMS
12.07.2026
POPE LEO, CARDINAL FERNANDEZ AND THE NEW BISHOPS IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON ARE NOT MAGISTERIAL AND APOSTOLIC ON THE CREEDS, COUNCILS AND CATECHISMS
Pope Leo is not apostolic and magisterial on the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms. He interprets them irrationally instead of rationally and so he is schismatic. There is a break with the Magisterium for example of the Middle Ages.
When he interprets Church Documents rationally then he automatically affirms the Tradition of the SSPX, SBC, F.I and Ecclesia Dei communities. He then affirms the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of the Latin Mass.
The popes from Paul VI to Leo XIV have interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally (LG 16 visible) instead of rationally (LG 16 invisible) and so are not magisterial and apostolic on Vatican Council II.
I interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so there is continuity with Tradition (EENS, Athanasius Creed etc).
So we now have two interpretations of Vatican Council II, theirs and mine. …Altro
The pope is Magisterial and Apostolic only when he interprets the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally and not irrationally as at present.
Pagliarani Blocked Fellay's 2018 Deal: "Rome Has to Acknowledge Its Errors"
- from Gloria TV
Lionel : The General Chapter of the SSPX when Bishop Fellay was the Superior General of the SSPX in his Statement affirmed Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, i.e EENS with no known exceptions. It was rejected by the Vatican. This was the end of dialogue at that time.
_______________________________
The Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X (FSSPX) rejected a Doctrinal Declaration proposed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), which would have been followed by the granting of a canonical status, Monsignor Guido Pozzo told LaNuovaBq.it on July 7.
Lionel: The Vatican affirms Vatican Council II with a break; a schism with the Council of Florence 1442 on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), with no known exceptions. For the Vatican, theoretical possibilities are practical exceptions for EENS. This is irrational and not part of the deposit of the faith. It is political.
…Altro
Great article!
AI on X confirms : 'No Council text states "explicit exceptions" or "visible cases in 2026";' Card. Fernandez cannot affirm the dogma EENS.He sees LG 16 etc as being visible exceptions for EENS. This is schism: error of new bishops in Washington
AI on X confirms : 'No Council text states "explicit exceptions" or "visible cases in 2026";' Card. Fernandez cannot affirm the dogma EENS.He sees LG 16 etc as being visible exceptions for EENS. This is schism.
Mike Lewis
Conversation with AI on X on Michael Lewis' channel.
AI
Introduction
Mike Lewis celebrates the July 7, 2026 episcopal ordination of two Washington priests—Gary R. Studniewski (titular Bishop of Jamestown) and Robert P. Boxie III (titular Bishop of Cataquas)—as auxiliary bishops appointed by Pope Leo XIV.
The post explicitly contrasts the event with a schismatic act the prior week, highlighting loyalty to papal authority and the unity of the Church's apostolic succession.
Pope Leo XIV (Robert Francis Prevost), the first U.S.-born pontiff elected in 2025 and an Augustinian with Peruvian ties, named the bishops in May 2026 to assist Cardinal Robert McElroy in the Archdiocese of Washington.
Lionel:
The Archdiocese of Washington has ordained as bishops Rev Gary R. Studniewski …Altro
AI on X states : John Paul II's Ad Tuendam Fidem (1998), which reinforced canonical penalties for denying definitive teachings, including major excommunication for obstinate rejection of truths proposed by the Magisterium. : SSPX schism
Conversation with AI or X on the channel of Brother Andre Marie micm
Brother André Marie, M.I.C.M.@Brother_Andre
AI on X states :
Cardinal Kurt Koch, Prefect of the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity, made remarks in a July 2, 2026 interview that appear to set God’s salvific will against extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which Dominus Iesus says we may not do. https://Page not found - Catholicism.orgkoch-on-extra-ecclesiam-nulla-salus.html… via @SBC_Catholic
The X post by traditional Catholic Brother André criticizes Cardinal Kurt Koch's July 2, 2026 interview for contrasting God's universal salvific will with the dogma "extra ecclesiam nulla salus," claiming it violates Dominus Iesus by setting the two truths against each other.
Koch stated that EENS applies mainly to convinced Catholics and argued strict interpretations like those of the SSPX conflict with Scripture's teaching that God wants all people saved, implying other paths exist outside the Church.
The post links to a Catholicism.org …Altro
CNA, AP, Reuters do not report that Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and aligned with the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire USA.
06.07.2026
CNA, AP, Reuters do not report that Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and aligned with the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire USA.
Cardinal Fernandez, Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester in New Hampshire and Fr. Georges de Laire the Judicial Vicar in NH, interprets LG 8, 14 16, UR 3 NA 2 Gs 22 etc in Vatican Council II as physically visible cases then places restrictions on the St. Benedict Center (SBC).But if they are physically visible cases then the decree of Prohibitions now placed upon the SBC, would apply to them. Since they would be affirming Feeneyite EENS in harmony with Feeneyite Vatican Council II.
There is a legal issue in New Hampshire, USA. In public Cardinal Fernandez and Bishop Libasci confuse implicit cases as being explicit exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. Then they coerced the St.Benedict Center with and a secular Decree of Prohibitions for not accepting the falsehood.
In the ongoing Michael Voris Fr. Georges de Laire legal case , Fr. Laire still …Altro
AI on X : To receive secular facilities Cardinal Fernandez wants Catholic organisations and religous communities to assume theoretical cases are practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc
04.07.2026
AI on X indicates : Catholics organisations, religious communities etc must affirm that hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire etc are practical exceptions for the dogma EENS in 2026, otherwise they will not be allowed by Cardinal Fernandez to ask for donations and have other secular facilities
AI on X in a brief conversation with Lionel Andrades on Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano’s channel on X.
AI comments on the link :
FERNANDEZ VIOLATES SECULAR AND MORAL LAWS FERNANDEZ VIOLATES SECULAR AND MORAL LAWS
AI ( Grok) on X says :
The gloria.tv post by Lionel Andrades accuses Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández of using coercive force and deception by requiring acceptance of Vatican II as a rupture with Tradition, particularly misapplying invisible/hypothetical cases (e.g., baptism of desire) as visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Andrades claims this violates secular laws on coercion and moral standards by compelling seminarians, religious orders (like SSPX, St. …Altro
LIONEL ANDRADES
@andrades_l15298
AI on X : To receive secular facilities Cardinal Fernandez wants Catholic organisations and religious communities to assume theoretical cases are practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc : Conversation with Lionel Andrades AI on X : To receive secular facilities Cardinal …
AI on X in a brief conversation with Lionel Andrades on Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano’s channel on X.
x.com/i/grok?conversation=2073402213465022738
FERNANDEZ VIOLATES SECULAR AND MORAL LAWS
04.07.2026
FERNANDEZ VIOLATES SECULAR AND MORAL LAWS
Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez have excommunicated six bishops of the SSPX since the bishops do not accept Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and schismatically, as do the cardinals and bishops in the mainline Catholic Church.There are legal restrictions on the SSPX, like those placed upon the religious community, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, USA.In both cases, Cardinal Fernandez uses a false premise and inference to interpret Vatican Council II and produce a non traditional conclusion. He then coerces Catholics who do not do so.
To be accepted by Cardinal Fernandez,it is obligatory for Catholics, to lie and project Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition. This is even though the Council is really Ecclesiocentric and Christocentric, in harmony with the past Church Councils, the Catechisms and the Creeds.
The ABC News, like other media, for example, refer to the …Altro
But does this fellow Fernandez event give a hoot?
Comment by AI on X( Grok),
FERNANDEZ VIOLATES SECULAR AND MORAL LAWS FERNANDEZ VIOLATES SECULAR AND MORAL LAWS
The gloria.tv post by Lionel Andrades accuses Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández of using coercive force and deception by requiring acceptance of Vatican II as a rupture with Tradition, particularly misapplying invisible/hypothetical cases (e.g., baptism of desire) as visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Andrades claims this violates secular laws on coercion and moral standards by compelling seminarians, religious orders (like SSPX, St. Benedict Center, Arlington Carmelites), and universities to adopt this view while charging traditionalists with schism.
Fernández, as DDF prefect, has been involved in actions against SSPX bishop consecrations and restrictions on traditional practices, drawing ongoing criticism from traditional Catholics for progressive stances on morality and doctrine.
x.com/i/grok?conversation=2073402213465022738
Andrades' argument centers on logic …Altro
AI on X states : The Gloria.tv article by Lionel Andrades argues Viganò's schism trial contains doctrinal errors, the DDF used an "irrational" interpretation of Vatican II texts
On Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano's X account I posted these links from Gloria TV in the AI section. These are the comments from AI ( Grok).
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò shared a photo of Italian street graffiti reading "siamo tutti lefebvrani" ("we are all Lefebvrists"), referencing the traditionalist movement of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.
Viganò, the former Apostolic Nuncio to the US who has been excommunicated and publicly criticized Vatican leadership including under Pope Leo XIV, frequently highlights resistance to post-Vatican II reforms.
The post ignited discussion in traditionalist circles, with supporters viewing it as solidarity against perceived Church corruption and critics warning it risks creating a sectarian focus on Lefebvre rather than core Catholic doctrine.Investigate SSPX current status
ARCHBISHOP VIGANO MUST APPEAL AGAINST ERRORS IN HIS SCHISM- TRIAL : VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IS NO MORE AN ISSUE FOR THE TRADITIONALISTS. ARCHBISHOP VIGANO MUST APPEAL AGAINST …Altro
ARCHBISHOP VIGANO MUST APPEAL AGAINST ERRORS IN HIS SCHISM- TRIAL : VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IS NO MORE AN ISSUE FOR THE TRADITIONALISTS.
03.07.2026
ARCHBISHOP VIGANO MUST APPEAL AGAINST ERRORS IN HIS SCHISM- TRIAL : VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IS NO MORE AN ISSUE FOR THE TRADITIONALISTS.
Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano has asked for a meeting with Pope Leo and has said that he is not in schism. The former Italian Nuncio could appeal against errors in his schism-trial.
Doctrinally the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) does not have a continuity with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (Holy Office) before 1949. The baptism of desire for example, referred to an invisible case over the centuries. It is common sense. So the baptism of desire was not an explicit exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Council of Florence 1442, which did not mention any exceptions for EENS, in its text. But for Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, Archbishop Joseph Kennedy and Pope Francis, Vatican Council II is a rupture with the dogma EENS. They imply that LG 14 (baptism of desire) is an explicit …Altro
Lionel Leslie Andrades
2025-09-02 Reconquest - He Is Not Mine | Mission …
The one who is seated on the throne of Peter is not Mine.6
Be alert and attentive. Do not let yourselves be confused or deceived.
Consider the works.
Consider what is promoted.
Consider what is permitted.
Consider what is punished.
Consider who is persecuted.
Wolves in sheep’s clothing that have not only entered My flock to seduce and separate, but who now act as shepherds and guides.
Full Message:
Skip to content
Mission of Divine Mercy
Search:
Español
LOGIN
Top Right Menu
SUPPORT
Messages
About Us
From Us
FAQs
More
Schedule
Prayer Requests
2025-09-02 Reconquest – He Is Not Mine
Download / Print
September 2nd, 2025
God the Father. “He is not Mine.”
(This Message was dictated to Sister in Spanish, and this is her translation into English.
NOTE: The footnotes are not dictated by God. They are added by Sister. Sometimes the footnote is to help clarify for the reader Sister’s sense of the meaning of a certain word or …Altro
Fr. Georges de Laire did not tell Michael Voris and Bro. Andre Marie micm that with LG 8,14,16 invisible Vatican Council II supports Feeneyite EENS. This was Ratzinger's Secret.
02.07.2026
The Michael Voris-Fr. Georges de Laire case is still pending and has not been closed said Brother Andre Marie micm.Also the Decree of Prohbitions against the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire has not been lifted.
Now we have new important facts about Vatican Council II which were developed over the last 15 years. They were unknown in the case filed by Fr. Georges de Laire against Michael Voris and Church Militant TV.
1.When Michael Voris was in New Hampshire Fr.Georges de Laire declined to give him an interview. He wanted to maintain the political Left interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and Vatican Council II even though it is dishonest. He did not interpret Vatican Council II, the baptism of desire and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( EENS) rationally and so honesetly. He was unethical.
2.Judge Joseph A. Diclerico Jr., in New Hampshire, considers invisible people as visible in 2021-2025.Is this a premise in any discussion, secular or religious ? …Altro
TRANSALPINE REDEMPTORISTS MUST CHOOSE THE RATIONAL VERSION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II BEFORE CARD.. FERNANDEZ AND BISHOP GILBERT ATTACK
02.07.2026
FR.MICHAEL MARY SUPERIOR GENERAL OF THE TRANSALPINE REDEMPTORISTS MUST CITE THE RATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II TO DEFEND HIMSELF : CARDI. FERNANDEZ AND BISHOP GILBERT COULD VC2 IRRATIONAL AGAINST THE TRADITIONALISTS IN SCOTLAND
On May 26, 2026 I wrote to Fr.Michael Mary fssr, Superior General of the Transalpine Redemptorists.
I mentioned that there was a new discovery of mine with reference to Vatican Council II. It is not new in the sense that Cardinal Ratzinger knew about it and so did Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez. They knew that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II referred to physically invisible cases in 1965-2026. This was a hidden secret. It allowed them to move freely and support the Left and penalize the traditionalist. Part of the secret was that Vatican Council II supported the traditionalists when LG 8, 14, 16 etc referred to invisible and hypothetical cases.
We now have a rational and irrational interpretation of …Altro
As we all should!
AI on X indicates Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez are in schism : petitions can be filed
A.I ON ‘X’ INDICATES POPE LEO IS IN PUBLIC SCHISM WHICH WAS AN IMPEDIMENT IN HIS ELECTION BY THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS ALSO IN SCHISM.
30.05.2025
With LG 16 visible we have schism with LG 16 invisible Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and traditional. This is a major doctrinal discovery in the Catholic Church. The liberal Vatican Council II becomes orthodox.
There is no denial from Fr. Joseph Fession sj, Jimmy Akin, Raymond Arroyo, Cardinal Muller. No denial from Larry Chapp, Scott Hahn, Matt Fradd. There is no denial or correction from Raoberto dei Mattei, Chris Ferrara and Corrado Gnerre.
There is no denial from the Society of St. Pius X, the Transalpine Redemptorists and the Franciscans of the Immaculate.
With LG 16 visible, Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez become traditionalists on Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
I affirm Vatican Council II. I affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church. I affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius …Altro
TIME TO FILE CANONICAL PETITIONS AGAINST CARDINAL FERNANDEZ AND THE BISHOPS AND PRIESTS
02.07.2026
Canonically, how can Cardinals Fernandez, Ladaria, O’Malley and Bishop Peter Libasci, interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, when Brother Andre Marie mimc interprets it rationally at the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, USA ?
In two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican, Vatican Council II is interpreted irrationally by Cardinal Fernandez and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj.They are Christianity and the World Religions and The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptised.
With the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II the Council has no explicit exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, of the Council of Florence 1442.But with the irrational interpretation of the cardinals there are exceptions for EENS.So Tradition is made obsolete for the cardinals with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
The sedevacantists CMRI in New Hampshire interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like Bishop Peter …Altro
NEW SSPX BISHOPS VOW OBEDIENCE TO POPE LEO ON SACRED TRADITION AND NOT VATICAN COUNCIL II, IRRATIONAL
02.07.2026
NEW SSPX BISHOPS VOW OBEDIENCE TO POPE LEO ON SACRED TRADITION AND NOT VATICAN COUNCIL II, IRRATIONAL
The new SSPX bishops vowed to be obedient to Pope Leo when he follows Tradition. They will not be obedient to him when he interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and so schismatically. Pope Leo interprets the Nicene Creed with the LG 16 visible false premise, which is heresy and produces schism. There is a rupture with the centuries old interpretation of the Creeds. Over the centuries being saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance referred to invisible cases. This changes the understanding of the Nicene, Athanasius and Apostles Creed.
The Catechism of the Council of Trent mentions ‘the desire thereof’ but does not state that it is visible or invisible. Common sense tells us it is invisible. Similarly when it is mentioned in Vatican Council II, LG 14 and LG 16 are not referred to as being visible or invisible. But Pope Leo interprets them as being …Altro
POPE LEO HIDES RATZINGER’S SECRET FROM FR. DAVIDE PAGLIARANI: AG 7 IS ALIGNED WITH EENS AND LG 16 IS NOT AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION FOR AG7 AND EENS. VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC
01.07.2026
POPE LEO HIDES RATZINGER’S SECRET FROM FR. DAVIDE PAGLIARANI: AG 7 IS ALIGNED WITH EENS AND LG 16 IS NOT AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION FOR AG7 AND EENS. VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC
Pope Leo did not give out the Ratzinger Secret to Fr.Davide Pagliarani. It is: Ad Gentes 7 is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Council of Florence 1442) while LG 8, 14, 16 etc are not objective exceptions for EENS or AG 7. Vatican Council II is traditional and not liberal.
Vatican Council II is aligned with the traditionalists. Pope Leo is in schism with LG 16 projected as a visible exception for EENS and AG 7. This is irrational. It is not tradition. It is not part of the deposit of the faith. It is not magisterial and apostolic. We now know that it is now Vatican Council II, which says outside the Church there is no salvation (AG 7). AG 7 is placed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the tile outside the Church no Salvation. (846). This was Ratzinger’s Secret. The …Altro