Catholic lay man in Rome. Discoverer of the Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II, a breakthrough for the present Catholic Church.The sedevacantists reject the pope because of Vatican Council II irrational. When the Council is rational it supports Tradition. There is no reason for them to reject the Council or the pope. Even the SSPX can now accept Vatican Council II , rational, and meet the demand that they accept the Council. The Council is in harmony with Tradition. So they can ask for canonical recognition. They can also demand that Pope Leo XIV interpret Vatican Council II rationally, since this is ethical and that he also accepts Tradition, as did Pope Leo XIII. The main line Catholic Church must now be traditional since the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms can only be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional.
RATZINGER DID NOT TELL LEFEBVRE ABOUT RAHNER’S LG 16 ERROR: HE WAS EXCOMMUNICATED WHEN VC2 WAS TRADITIONAL: NO COMMENT FROM SSPX
22.01.2026
RATZINGER DID NOT TELL LEFEBVRE ABOUT RAHNER’S LG 16 ERROR: HE WAS EXCOMMUNICATED WHEN VC2 WAS TRADITIONAL: NO COMMENT FROM SSPX
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was not told that the Council could have been interpreted without the Rahnerian LG 16-mistake.Instead they excommunicated him and the bishops of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX).Even today, the SSPX is not told to accept Vatican Council II (VC2) rational i.e. without the Rahner mistake, found in his book The Christian of the Future.
Pope Leo kept all this a secret from Fr. John Berg, the Superior General of the FSSP (Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter), whom he met the other day. The original members of the FSSP had their religious formation with the SSPX. They were affected by the excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre.
When Pope Benedict issued Summorum Pontificum, the SSPX was still not told that they could have full canonical recognition if they accepted Vatican Council II, rationally, without the Rahnerian factual …Altro
VATICAN COUNCIL II WAS TRADITIONAL WITHOUT THE RAHNER LG 16 - ERROR : RATZINGER DID NOT TELL LEFEBVRE
21.01.2026
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger did not disclose the Rahner LG 16 – error. The Council would have been traditional and the liberals in schism. Instead he excommunicated Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre for not accepting Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise of Karl Rahner.
It is now clear. Fr. Karl Rahner made a mistake in the book The Christian of the Future (1967.Herder and Herder, New York). On pp.94 and 95 he projects being saved in invincible ignorance ( Lumen Gentiun 16) as being an explicit and known example of salvation outside the Catholic Church. He then infers that LG 16 is an objective exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). So EENS has become obsolete for him (pp.82-85).
In this book made up of talks he gave in Germany in 1965 he criticizes the understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus ‘in a very exclusive and permissive way’… So for him there is a new understanding of mission- that of the anonymous Christian, since the dogma EENS …Altro
Pope Leo did not tell Fr. John Berg, FSSP about Rahner’s LG 16-error just as Pope Benedict did not inform Bishop Fellay : secret during excommunication of Lefebvre
22.01.2026
Pope Leo did not tell Fr.John Berg, FSSP about Rahner’s LG 16-error just as Pope Benedict did not inform Bishop Fellay about it. It would be the end of liberalism with a Council which is traditional at every rite and liturgy.
Pope Leo and the FSSP have not issued a statement saying Lumen Gentium 16, being saved in invincible ignorance, outside the Catholic Church, refers to a hypothetical case. So it is not an explicit exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Augustine’s massa dannata, as Rahner wrote in his book, The Christian of the Future.
Pope Leo kept this new discovery on Vatican Council II a secret. We now know that with Ad Gentes 7 Vatican Council II is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence and invisible cases in 2025, of LG 16 etc are not objective exceptions for EENS and the rest of Tradition.
Pope Benedict did not tell this to Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops before he excommunicated them for not …Altro
Love your articles! It is quite amazing how irrational we have become!
Karl Rahner made a factual mistake in his book, there is no denial from anyone : Pope Leo and the cardinals follow him
20.01.2026
Karl Rahner made a factual mistake in his book, there is no denial from anyone : Pope Leo and the cardinals follow him
Lumen Gentium 16 refers to an invisible person in our human reality. This is a fact of life. We cannot see or meet anyone saved in invincible ignorance. So LG 16 cannot be an explicit example of salvation outside the Church as Rahner implies. It cannot be an objective exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as held by Augustine and Aquinas.
On Jan.17,2026 I wrote on Gloria TV 1 that Karl Rahner used the False Premise and Inference to interpret Vatican Council II in his book, The Christian of the Future (1967.Herder and Herder, New York). On pp.94 and 95 he projects being saved in invincible ignorance of Lumen Gentiun 16 as being an explicit and known example of salvation outside the Catholic Church. He then infers that LG 16 is an objective exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So EENS has become obsolete for him (pp.82-85).
In this …Altro
POPE LEO’S PRESENT INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IS HERETICAL AND SCHISMATIC AND DISQUALIFIES HIM FROM OFFERING HOLY MASS
18.01.2026
POPE LEO’S PRESENT INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IS HERETICAL AND SCHISMATIC AND DISQUALIFIES HIM FROM OFFERING HOLY MASS
Thousands of priests and religious sisters gave up their vocation after 1965 since Vatican Council II was schismatic and not traditional. They did not know about the implicit-explicit confusion. Pope Paul VI, Rahner, Ratzinger and Lefebvre did not tell them about it. The Council was really traditional without the subjective-objective error.
Pope Benedict maintained the lie in Karl Rahner’s book The Christian of the Future . He supported the New Theology based upon implicit cases of the baptism of desire being explicit exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Council of Trent. Unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) were projected as known exceptions for Augustine and Aquinas on outside the Church there is no salvation.
Archbishop Lefebvre was excommunicated because he did not accept Vatican Council …Altro
We do not need to interpret "Vatican II" just - as late Fr. Hesse used to say - throw it where it belongs i.e. to the trash can.
No Catholic needs "Vatican II" for anything as orthodox passages of "conciliar documents" can be found elsewhere in the Catholic Magisterium and heterodox like e.g.:
"According to the almost unanimous opinion of believers and unbelievers alike, all things on earth should be related to man as their center and crown" (GS 12)
"For men who believe in Christ and have been truly baptized are in communion with the Catholic Church even though this communion is imperfect..... It follows that the separated Churches and Communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have been by no means deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Church." (UR 3)
"…Altro
POPE LEO MUST NOT ALLOW THE IMPRIMATUR FOR NEW BOOKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II INTERPRETED WITH THE FALSE PREMISE : RAHNER’S BOOKS MUST BE PULLED BACK
17.01.2026
POPE LEO MUST NOT ALLOW THE IMPRIMATUR FOR NEW BOOKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II INTERPRETED WITH THE FALSE PREMISE : RAHNER’S BOOKS MUST BE PULLED BACK
Karl Rahner uses the False Premise and Inference to interpret Vatican Council II in his book, The Christian of the Future (1967.Herder and Herder, New York). On pp.94 and 95 he projects being saved in invincible ignorance of Lumen Gentiun 16 as being an explicit and known example of salvation outside the Catholic Church. He then infers that LG 16 is an objective exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So EENS has become obsolete for him (pp.82-85).
In this book made up of talks he gave in Germany in 1965 he criticizes the understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus ‘in a very exclusive and permissive way’.
For him the Church is the Sacrament of the world’s salvation (p.8) and there is no reference to Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.
So for him there is a new understanding of mission …Altro
The main problem now is not Rahner's or Congar's books but the post-conciliar pseudo-magisterium pushing the doctrinal revolution. Documents like Redemptor hominis, Ut unum sint, Evangelii Gaudium, Amoris Laetitia, etc.
LIST OF PRIESTS NEEDED WHO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY ALIGNED WITH THE ROMAN MISSAL AND TRADITION
16.01.2026
LIST OF PRIESTS NEEDED WHO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY ALIGNED WITH THE ROMAN MISSAL AND TRADITION
Latin Mass groups must make films and publish articles which show there is a new discovery within the Catholic Church which supports the Roman Missal and the Latin Mass and not Pope Leo and cardinals Roche and Fernandez.
THE FILM
The film, like the one on Charlotte, North Carolina, mentions the closure or restrictions on the Latin Mass. This is being done by bishops who interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and so unethically. They also support new versions of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, which make obsolete the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal at the Latin Mass. It creates exceptions for also the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX. This is public heresy and schism since now it is known that Magisterial Documents can be re-interpreted rationally …Altro
NEW CHARLOTTE-FILM MUST SHOW HOW THE BISHOP INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY AND SCHISMATICALLY
15.01.2026
NEW CHARLOTTE-FILM MUST SHOW HOW THE BISHOP INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY AND SCHISMATICALLY
Peter Kwasniewski is not formally telling the bishops in Charlotte, San Antonio, Detroit etc that 1) the blue passages in Vatican Council II dominate 2) the red is not an exception for the blue 3) the Rational Premise and Inference must be chosen 4) Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms must be interpreted with an invisible and not visible baptism of desire (LG14) and the conclusion is traditional.
So from where does the liberalism of the bishops still come from? Not Vatican Council II, anymore!
Kwasniewski is not saying this in his conversations with Larry Chapp and disciples of Balthazar, Rahner and Ratzinger, who used the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, as Kwasniewski does today.
At the Consistory Pope Leo did not tell the cardinals to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms with only the Rational Premise and …Altro
@Jan Joseph Because they rejected Our Lady of Fatima's request! Russia's errors took hold of the Modernists!
I wonder if they really even know they are believing a false premise! It has been taught so much it has become the new moral law for ecuminism!
Cardinal Roche interpreted Vatican Council II unethically and deceptively : Traditionis Custode is obsolete with the Irrational Premise
14.01.202
Cardinal Roche interpreted Vatican Council II unethically and deceptively : Traditionis Custode is obsolete with the Irrational Premise
From Gloria TV with comments:
Cardinal Roche’s Paper against the Mass in the Roman Rite
Cardinal Arthur Roche distributed at Leo XIV’s consistory last week a text on liturgy. Journalist Nico Spuntoni published the two-page report (facsimile below). It is a strong defence of Traditionis Custodes.
Lionel: We can interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and the conclusion is traditional and orthodox. Pope Francis wrongly interpreted Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise to produce a liberal conclusion and the result was Traditionis Custode etc.
Catholics are obliged to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally.
_________________________
The report was one of four texts distributed to the cardinals. The others were written by Cardinals Tucho (Faith), Grech (Synod) and Baggio (Human development).
Lionel: Similarly on Faith …Altro
VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS A REALITY OF ITS OWN ON ECUMENISM, DIALOGUE, COLLEGIALITY, CHRIST THE KING, ECCLESIOCENTRIC MISSION ETC : POPE LEO, FISCHELLA AND SPADARO MUST CHOOSE THE RATIONAL PREMISE
14.01.2026
VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS A REALITY OF ITS OWN ON ECUMENISM, DIALOGUE, COLLEGIALITY, CHRIST THE KING, ECCLESIOCENTRIC MISSION ETC : POPE LEO, FISCHELLA AND SPADARO MUST CHOOSE THE RATIONAL PREMISE
Vatican Council II has a reality of its own. We affirm Ad Gentes 7 (all need faith and baptism for salvation) and then point out that Lumen Gentium 16 is not an exception for AG 7.
We cannot first, affirm LG 16 and then suggest that LG 16 etc are physically visible cases of known persons saved outside the Catholic Church, without faith and baptism, in the present times.This would be irrational and it would be confusing.
In inter-religious dialogue the blue passages dominate and the red passages are not explicit exceptions for AG 7.
Pope Leo cannot cite LG 16 etc as the norm for salvation or an exception for AG 7 and the dogma EENS. This would be irrational.
In Collegiality, for all, the blue passages dominate and the red are not exceptions. So we have unity. There is no liberal …Altro
VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS A REALITY OF ITS OWN : INDEPENDENT OF POPE LEO XIV
13.01.2026
VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS A REALITY OF ITS OWN : INDEPENDENT OF POPE LEO XIV
1. 1.The Irrational Premise creates a rupture with Tradition irrespective if you are a liberal or conservative Catholic.
The Rational Premise creates a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Council of Florence 1442, which did not mention any exceptions.
2, ‘The red is not an exception for the blue’ in Vatican Council II. The hypothetical passages, underscored in red, do not contradict the orthodox passages marked in blue.
If the hypothetical passages in Vatican Council II are marked in purple then the purple is not an exception for the blue here.
3. If the baptism of desire (LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) refer to a physically visible case, a known person, saved outside the Catholic Church with the baptism of desire (BOD) or in invincible ignorance (I.I), then the BOD and I.I are explicit exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam …Altro
POPE LEO, FISCHELLA, SPADARO ARE ALIGNED WITH THE TRADTIONALISTS WHEN THE RATIONAL PREMISE IS USED TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II
12.01.2026
POPE LEO, FISCHELLA, SPADARO ARE ALIGNED WITH THE TRADTIONALISTS WHEN THE RATIONAL PREMISE IS USED TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II
EWTN has to interpret Vatican Council II only rationally and then they will be affirming the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX.
The Catholic National Reporter is aligned with the Society of St. Pius X when they both interpret Vatican Council II with only the rational premise I mentioned yesterday. There is no denial from Sean Winters and John Allen Jr. They agree with me.
In the same Archbishop Rino Fisichella and Fr. Antonio Spadaro sj are in the same theological boat as the traditionalist St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, USA when the premise and inference are rational.
So we know more have a liberal Vatican Council II and so the liberal-traditionalist division has ended in the Church.
All this is not mentioned in the catechesis on Vatican Council II by Pope Leo who still interprets …Altro
NATIONAL CATHOLIC REPORTER, SSPX ALIGNED ON VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS : RATIONAL PREMISE UNITES
11.01.2025
NATIONAL CATHOLIC REPORTER, SSPX ALIGNED ON VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS : RATIONAL PREMISE UNITES
Will the National Catholic Reporter and the SSSPX choose the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with ‘the strict interpretation’ of the dogma extra ecclesium nulla salus , the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ? The National Catholic Reporter and the Society of St. Pius X in the same doctrinal boat? When Cardinal Walter Kasper and Bishop Bernard Fellay affirm Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise they are aligned with Feeneyite extra ecclesium nulla salus (EENS). No liberal - traditionalist division exists.
When Pope Leo interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise he is a rad trad on EENS. But the rad trad is a liberal like Bishop Robert Barron, if he chooses to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and not like Balthazar. Barron is then no more a liberal.
Can you picture this? This the National Catholic …Altro
HILDEBRAND, LEFEBVRE, MATTEI, GRUNER, FERRARA AND MARSHALL USED THE FALSE PREMISE TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IN IGNORANCE.
10.01.2025
HILDEBRAND, LEFEBVRE, MATTEI, GRUNER, FERRARA AND MARSHALL USED THE FALSE PREMISE TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IN IGNORANCE.
Dietrich and Alice von Hildebrand, Paolo Pascualucci, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Roberto dei Mattei, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, Christopher Ferrara, Mons. Ignacio Barreiro and others were all interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism. So this line of traditionalist writers had it wrong on the Council. Their premise was wrong and so their conclusion was wrong.
Roberto dei Mattei will not announce that he made a mistake on Vatican Council II all these years
Taylor Marshall interprets St. Thomas Aquinas with Cushingism and not Feeneyism and so there is a rupture with Tradition for him.
Michael Davies, Atila Sinke Guimares, John Vennari interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise. So there was an artificial rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
The SSPX bishops too made their original …Altro
"A deceptive rupture." Distill V2 into it's smallest error and this makes it the biggest thing that could have possibly injured Holy mother the Church! How could so small a thing be so dangerous?
CONSERVATIVE CARDINALS AT THE CONSISTORY SUPPORT THE LIBERAL AND SCHISMATIC VATICAN COUNCIL II APPROVED BY THE LEFT
10.01.2026
CONSERVATIVE CARDINALS AT THE CONSISTORY SUPPORT THE LIBERAL AND SCHISMATIC VATICAN COUNCIL II APPROVED BY THE LEFT
Cardinals today are in a similar situation as when King Henry VIII wanted to marry Anne Boleyn and threathened to take away the property of the English cardinals who did not support him. So Protestantism was born.
Cardinals Sarah, Burke, Muller and Napier at the Consistory were supporting an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II which is politically correct and is used to rationalize LGBT ideology.
The conservative cardinals did not issue a statement saying ‘LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. They are not physically visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church. They are not explicit exceptions for Ad Gentes 7 (all need faith and baptism for salvation) and neither are objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442, which did not mention …Altro
POPE LEO AND THE CONSISTORY VIOLATE ARISTOLE’S PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION AND NEWTON’S LAWS OF PHYSICS : TO APPEASE THE POLITICAL - LEFT
09.01.2026
POPE LEO AND THE CONSISTORY VIOLATE ARISTOLE’S PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION AND NEWTON’S LAWS OF PHYSICS : TO APPEASE THE POLITICAL - LEFT
Pope Leo violates the Principle of Non Contradiction of Aristotle, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. The Consistory follows him.
If someone is saved outside the Catholic Church, without ‘faith and baptism’ (AG 7), he is in Heaven and known only to God. But for Pope Leo and the Consistory, he is an explicit exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Council of Florence 1442. In other words, he is visible on earth, to be an exception for the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. But an invisible person cannot be an exception for EENS. Someone has to be there, to exist in our reality, to be an exception.
BOX OF ORANGES
If there is a box oranges and there is an apple in the middle of that box, then that apple is an exception, since it is different but also because it is there in that box.…Altro
POPE LEO AND THE CONSISTORY'S NEW ECCLESIOLOGY IS SCHISMATIC WITH THE FALSE PREMISE : WITH THE RATIONAL PREMISE THEY GO BACK TO TRADITION
08.01.2026
POPE LEO AND THE CONSISTORY'S NEW ECCLESIOLOGY IS SCHISMATIC WITH THE FALSE PREMISE : WITH THE RATIONAL PREMISE THEY GO BACK TO TRADITION
If any pope or religious, uses an irrational premise and inference to interpret magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II, the conclusion has to be irrational, non traditional- and heretical.This is being done by the Consistory and Pope Leo.Their ecclesiology is false.Nothing personal. Anyone who chooses the false premise ends up schismatic.
THE FALSE PREMISE IS:
The premise is that there is known salvation outside the Church and the conclusion is that the dogma EENS is no longer valid.
The premise is that we know of people saved without the baptism of water and the conclusion is that there is salvation outside the Church. So there is a new doctrine on salvation.
The premise is that we can know objectively subjective factors which would indicate that a person in manifest mortal sin is not going to Hell and so the conclusion is that …Altro
Only way to interpret VII is to throw it out entirely.
POPE LEO AND THE CONSISTORY MUST NOT INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II DECEPTIVELY FOR POLITICAL REASONS . THE COUNCIL IS TRADTIIONAL
08.01.2026
POPE LEO AND THE CONSISTORY MUST NOT INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II DECEPTIVELY FOR POLITICAL REASONS . THE COUNCIL IS TRADTIIONAL
Pope Leo must not confuse implicit cases as being explicit, create a liberal, non traditional conclusion and then say Vatican Council II must be developed and deepened, it is the North Star. This is dishonesty. Invisible people are invisible.
He must interpret implicit cases of LG 8 ,14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, as not being explicit exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. An ecclesiocentric Vatican Council II must support an ecclesiocentric Roman Missal of the Latin Mass.
Pope Leo has not informed the Study Groups at the Consistory that Vatican Council II is traditional, orthodox and exclusivist. It is in harmony with traditional faith and morals. So there cannot be any innovation. Homosexual unions and other LGBT agenda are mortal sins …Altro
The gates of Hell shall not triumph over the Bark of Peter! May we be aboard our saving Holy Mother the Church!
Sorry, but that ship has sailed.
THE CARDINALS AT THE CONSISTORY ARE SCHISMATIC : THEY CANNOT EVEN DENY IT
07.01.2026
THE CARDINALS AT THE CONSISTORY ARE SCHISMATIC : THEY CANNOT EVEN DENY IT
For the cardinals at the Consistory this month the Athanasius Creed has exceptions in Vatican Council II but for me there are no exceptions. The red is not an exception for the blue, for me. For the cardinals and the pope, the baptism of desire is an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442. For me it is not an exception.
The Nicene Creed for Pope Leo is: I believe in three or more baptisms for the forgiveness of sin. There is the baptism of desire, baptism of blood, being saved in invincible ignorance etc, all without the baptism of water.For me there is only one visible and repeatable baptism, the baptism of water. We cannot give anyone the baptism of desire.
So the Athanasius Creed for Pope Leo and Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, Prefect, of the Dicastery for the Doctirne of the Faith, Vatican. says outside the Catholic Church there is known salvation …Altro
CARDINALS AT THE CONSISTORY CAN NO MORE BE ‘OPEN MINDED’ SINCE THE THEOLOGY IS NO MORE THERE IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
07.01.2025
CARDINALS AT THE CONSISTORY CAN NO MORE BE ‘OPEN MINDED’ SINCE THE THEOLOGY IS NO MORE THERE IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
Catholics can no more be told to be ‘open minded’ since the theology is no more there in Vatican Council II for liberalism. The Council is exclusivist on salvation and with Ad Gentes 7 it is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal. So there is no room for liberalism any more.
We cannot still pretend that invisible and implicit cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) are explicit examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965-2025.So the dogma extra ecclesium nulla salus is obsolete. No. It is liberalism based on the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II- confusing what is implicit as being explicit-which is obsolete.
The new theology based upon this confusion, as held by the cardinals at the Consistory this month, is obsolete.
The Consistory cannot be open to the LGBT agenda, since the liberal …Altro