NATIONAL CATHOLIC REPORTER, SSPX ALIGNED ON VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS : RATIONAL PREMISE UNITES
11.01.2025Will the National Catholic Reporter and the SSSPX choose the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with ‘the strict interpretation’ of the dogma extra ecclesium nulla salus , the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ? The National Catholic Reporter and the Society of St. Pius X in the same doctrinal boat? When Cardinal Walter Kasper and Bishop Bernard Fellay affirm Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise they are aligned with Feeneyite extra ecclesium nulla salus (EENS). No liberal - traditionalist division exists.
When Pope Leo interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise he is a rad trad on EENS. But the rad trad is a liberal like Bishop Robert Barron, if he chooses to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and not like Balthazar. Barron is then no more a liberal.
Can you picture this? This the National Catholic Reporter correspondents and the sedevactist bishops having the same interpretation of Vatican Council II and returning to the old theology?
The division came into the Church with liberalism and liberalism was produced with the False Premise and Inference. It created an EENS with exceptions.
What is Cardinals Muller, Hollerich and Grech at the European Synods expected to say now? They will not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise, to maintain the liberal division in the Church?
With the rational Premise, liberalism is obsolete and so is the present Synod- theology. There is no new theology with the Rational Premise.
Michael Sean Winters and Roberto dei Mattei would be on the same ship.
Winters at the NCVR may not like this and neither John Allen jr. at Crux but when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally there is only one conclusion. It is common for all.
Pope Leo has said Vatican Council II is like the North Star which guides us. He could be saying Sacred Tradition will be the North Star which guides. The Council is traditional, with the Rational Premise, Rational Inference and orthodox conclusion.
Vatican Council II supports traditional faith and morals and not the LGBT agenda.
Vatican Council II is now aligned with the Latin Mass Societies and not Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and liberal bishops.
In New Hampshire, it is Bishop Peter Liabasci who is in schism according to Vatican Council II and not the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in New Hampshire.
In Frijof Toulon, France it is the new liberal bishop who is in schism according to Vatican Council II, with the Rational Premise and not the traditionalist Alcuin Reid.
At Viterbo, Italy the cancelled priests must appeal to the local bishop to come back to the Catholic faith and accept Vatican Council II.
Who gives the Rector at the Sacred Heart Major seminary in Detroit, USA the right to interpret Vatican Council II dishonestly? He must interpret Vatican Council II like the Latin Mass traditionalists in New Hampshire.
There can no more be a New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology, New Evangelization and New Canon Law etc. We are restricted by Vatican Council II. The Council limits us to the old theology and ecclesiology.
This is springtime for the Ecclesia Dei communities. How can you have a Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith; Vatican, who does not accept Vatican Council II they could ask? Morally, the Council can only be interpreted rationally and so honestly.
How can we have a pope who interprets Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally? There is no other option for him but the rational one.
Times, have changed, or rather, there has been no change in the Catholic Church.
Christ is still the star we follow, yesterday, today and tomorrow’- Lionel Andrades