FERNANDEZ, LIBASSI AND LAIRE ESCAPE A DECREE OF PROHIBITIONS AND PRECEPTS BY BEING DISHONEST: THEY COERCED THE SLAVES OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY IN NH
30.12.2025FERNANDEZ, LIBASSI AND LAIRE ESCAPE A DECREE OF PROHIBITIONS AND PRECEPTS BY BEING DISHONEST : THEY COERCED THE SLAVES OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY IN NH
No Catholic is safe in New Hampshire.This is coercion. It is not Catholic. It is political and ideological.
They were being coerced with a legal Decree of Prohibitions and Precepts. They were being forced to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church 847-848 ( saved in invincible ignorance) as a practical exception, for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) defined by Church Councils ( 1215,1442).This is irrational. It is dishonest.
The bishop, judicial vicar and Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, are forcing all religious communities ( Franciscans, Carmelites etc) to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II ( AG 7, LG 14) irrationally or be hit with a Decree, and be declared ‘legally non Catholic’.
How can Fr. Georges de Laire, who interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally, rejects outright the Athanasius Creed, changes the understanding of the Nicene Creed, puts aside the Church Councils which defined EENS, ex cathedra and infallibly – be allowed at the Marriage Tribunal in the diocese? This is first class heresy on the Creeds and EENS and schism with the Magisterium over the centuries (Creeds, Councils etc).
Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester in New Hampshire (NH) and Fr. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar, were coercing the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, at the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, NH.
They were being coerced with a legal Decree of Prohibitions and Precepts. They were being forced to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church 847-848 ( saved in invincible ignorance) as a practical exception, for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) defined by Church Councils ( 1215,1442).This is irrational. It is dishonest. How can invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire be visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS? This is unethical.
They intentionally persisted with the Decree of Prohibitions and Precepts, even after being informed via the Curia, through the Internet and in personal e-mails sent to them that CCC 847-848 were not exceptions for EENS, as interpreted by the St. Benedict Center in NH.
The Letter from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, with the CDF error, is posted on the website of the Diocese of Manchester in NH. It is public evidence.
The bishop and the judicial vicar in the diocese of Manchester must apologize to the St. Benedict Center and CMTV.
The bishop and judicial vicar and the Curia at Manchester, interpret LG 8,14,1,5,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II as referring to physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965-2024. Only in this way there can be exceptions for EENS according to the Councils, which did not mention any exceptions. The judge must be asked if he too considers them physically visible cases. Can he meet or see someone saved outside the Catholic Church in invincible ignorance (LG 16) or the baptism of desire (LG 14)? Yet without this ruse, Fr. Laire would be Feeneyite on EENS and liable for a Decree issued against him.
The bishop, judicial vicar and Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, are forcing all religious communities ( Franciscans, Carmelites etc) to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II ( AG 7, LG 14) irrationally or be hit with a Decree, and be declared ‘legally non Catholic’.
This is coercion. It is not Catholic. It is political and ideological. The average Catholic in New Hampshire is not expected to obey, it must be pointed out.
How can Fr. Georges de Laire, who interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally, rejects outright the Athanasius Creed, changes the understanding of the Nicene Creed, puts aside the Church Councils which defined EENS, ex cathedra and infallibly – be allowed at the Marriage Tribunal in the diocese? This is first class heresy on the Creeds and EENS and schism with the Magisterium over the centuries (Creeds, Councils etc). This is a public scandal. Is the Holy Mass offered by Fr. Laire and the bishop, a sacrilege? Is not all this an ‘impediment’ according to Canon Law, for offering Holy Mass?
Fr. Georges de Laire provides compensation/ relief to the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary and to other involved in the law suit he filed.
By submitting false and obsolete information on Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents, even though a rational and traditional option is available in public, Fr. Laire, and the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican were dishonest. They used this information coercively against the St. Benedict Center NH, and hid the information about Fr. Laire, interpreting Magisterial Documents deceptively, and who now denies that he is in any way unethical.
It must be emphasized that if Fr. Georges de Laire did not interpret CCC 847-848 and Vatican Council II (AG 7) dishonestly then he would be affirming Feeneyite EENS, like the St. Benedict Center NH. So he would be eligible to have the Decree issued against him. It would be the same for Bishop Libasci and his Curia. Now he personally escaped a Decree of Prohibitions being issued against him, by being unethical.
They were assisted by Pope Francis who did not tell the Jewish Anti Defamation League (ADL) and Cardinal Sean O ‘Malley that the familiar interpretation of Vatican Council II is now obsolete. The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School (FSCIRE) that of Ursula Von der Leyer of the European Commission, is not Catholic. Catholics are now interpreting the Council differently.-Lionel Andrades
27.12.2025
SHE INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY BUT HER FATHER WAS EXPELLED BY BOSTON COLLEGE WHICH IS IRRATIONAL ON THE COUNCIL AND CATECHISMS.
Boston College today interprets Vatican Council II and the Catechism of Pope John Paul II rationally unlike Sister Marie Terese.
SHE INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY BUT …
26.12.2025
JUDICIAL VICAR INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II DISHONESTLY AND HAS PLACED SANCTIONS ON A RELIGIOUS SISTER WHO DOES NOT
JUDICIAL VICAR INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II …
25.12.2025
Fr. Georges de Laire interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally. This is dishonest. He does it still. There is no denial from the Curia in the Diocese of Manchester, USA.
Fr. Georges de Laire interpreted Vatican Council …
24.12.2025
EVIDENCE SHOWS FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE MADE A DOCTRINAL MISTAKE DURING MICHAEL VORIS CASE AND WHEN THE DECREE OF PROHIBITIONS WAS ISSUED AGAINST THE ST. BENEDICT CENTER, RICHMOND, NEW HAMPSHIRE , USA.
EVIDENCE SHOWS FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE MADE A …
24.12.2025
FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE WHO ISSUED A LEGAL DECREE AGAINST THE ST.BENEDICT CENTER NH Now has to affirm traditional salvation-theology LIKE THEM
Vatican Council II rational and blue supports the traditionalists in Richmond , New Hampshire,USA.FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE WHO ISSUED A LEGAL DECREE …
23.12.2025
CARDINAL FERNANDEZ, BISHOP PETER LIBASSI AND FR. GEORGES LAIRE, TRY TO FORCE VATICAN COUNCIL II RED UPON A RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY WHICH CHOOSES VATICAN COUNCIL II, BLUE
CARDINAL FERNANDEZ, BISHOP PETER LIBASI AND FR. …
23.12.2025
CATHOLICS MUST CHOOSE VATICAN COUNCL II BLUE LIKE THE ST. BENEDICT CENTER IN NH AND NOT VATICAN COUNCIL II RED LIKE THE SSPX.
CATHOLICS MUST CHOOSE VATICAN COUNCL II BLUE …