71years . Baptised as an infant. Catholic ancestors go back to Goa. Urban hermit. Discoverer of The Rational Premise and VC2 rational and irrational. Break for trads.Discovered late in life that with LG 16 visible we get the New Theology and with LG 16 invisible we return to the Scholastic theology on EENS etc.
March 17. St. Patrick. Baptised at St. Patrick's Cathedral. Studied at St. Patrick's School,Graduated from St. Patrick's College, Karachi. Irish missionaries!
Eldest son of Luke and Maggie Andrades.Completed semesters in theology , with exams and credit points, at the National Catholic Institute of Theology, Karachi.
Studied Philosophy at the University Pontificia Regina Apostoloum, Rome. Final semester left. Also attended corses in Theology and Latin.
Catholic lay man in Rome. Discoverer of Feeneyism versus Cushingism, the Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II, a breakthrough for the present Catholic Church.The sedevacantists reject the pope because of Vatican Council II irrational. When the Council is rational it supports Tradition. There is no reason for them to reject the Council or the pope. Even the SSPX can now accept Vatican Council II , rational, and meet the demand that they accept the Council. The Council is in harmony with Tradition. So they can ask for canonical recognition. They can also demand that Pope Leo XIV interpret Vatican Council II rationally, since this is ethical and that he also accept Tradition, as did Pope Leo XIII. The main line Catholic Church must now be traditional since the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms can only be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional.
Leo XIV Continues Francis’ Course, but with a Different Tone - Francis' Biographer
18.04.2026
The SSPX maintains the separation of Church and State, a leftist concept. Since they use the New Theology created with the False Premise they have collegiality, with the liberals.
With the New Theology they are liberals on Ecumenism and Inter-Religious Dialogue, like the pope and the cardinals and bishops. Cushingism is liberalism and schism.
They cite Tradition but in Tradition there were no separation between state and Church.
Presently Pope Leo is aligned with the leftist state.
They interpret Vatican Council II as does Pope Francis in Evangelii Gaudium.
EG mentions hypothetical cases as if they are visible and personally known people, in the present times saved outside the Catholic Church. Ad Gentes 7 is not mentioned and it is assumed that Vatican Council II has explicit exceptions for AG 7 and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This is the common irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION EVANGELII GAUDIUM OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS
Ecumenical dialogue
244. Commitment to ecumenism responds to the prayer of the Lord Jesus that “they may all be one” (Jn 17:21). The credibility of the Christian message would be much greater if Christians could overcome their divisions and the Church could realize “the fullness of catholicity proper to her in those of her children who, though joined to her by baptism, are yet separated from full communion with her”.[192] We must never forget that we are pilgrims journeying alongside one another. This means that we must have sincere trust in our fellow pilgrims, putting aside all suspicion or mistrust, and turn our gaze to what we are all seeking: the radiant peace of God’s face. Trusting others is an art and peace is an art. Jesus told us: “Blessed are the peacemakers” (Mt 5:9). In taking up this task, also among ourselves, we fulfil the ancient prophecy: “They shall beat their swords into ploughshares” (Is 2:4).
Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and traditional with Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) while hypothetical and invisible cases of LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA2 ,GS 22 etc are not explicit exceptions for AG 7 or the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So there can only be an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church.
Relations with Judaism
247. We hold the Jewish people in special regard because their covenant with God has never been revoked, for “the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable” (Rom 11:29). The Church, which shares with Jews an important part of the sacred Scriptures, looks upon the people of the covenant and their faith as one of the sacred roots of her own Christian identity (cf. Rom 11:16-18). As Christians, we cannot consider Judaism as a foreign religion; nor do we include the Jews among those called to turn from idols and to serve the true God (cf. 1 Thes 1:9). With them, we believe in the one God who acts in history, and with them we accept his revealed word.
249. God continues to work among the people of the Old Covenant and to bring forth treasures of wisdom which flow from their encounter with his word. For this reason, the Church also is enriched when she receives the values of Judaism. While it is true that certain Christian beliefs are unacceptable to Judaism, and that the Church cannot refrain from proclaiming Jesus as Lord and Messiah, there exists as well a rich complementarity which allows us to read the texts of the Hebrew Scriptures together and to help one another to mine the riches of God’s word. We can also share many ethical convictions and a common concern for justice and the development of peoples.
Since Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric with Ad Gentes 7 the Church still teaches that Judaism is not a path to salvation from Hell ( AG 7, CCC 846).This is the Conciliar Church.
Interreligious dialogue
250. An attitude of openness in truth and in love must characterize the dialogue with the followers of non-Christian religions, in spite of various obstacles and difficulties, especially forms of fundamentalism on both sides. Interreligious dialogue is a necessary condition for peace in the world, and so it is a duty for Christians as well as other religious communities. This dialogue is in first place a conversation about human existence or simply, as the bishops of India have put it, a matter of “being open to them, sharing their joys and sorrows”.[194] In this way we learn to accept others and their different ways of living, thinking and speaking. We can then join one another in taking up the duty of serving justice and peace, which should become a basic principle of all our exchanges. A dialogue which seeks social peace and justice is in itself, beyond all merely practical considerations, an ethical commitment which brings about a new social situation. Efforts made in dealing with a specific theme can become a process in which, by mutual listening, both parts can be purified and enriched. These efforts, therefore, can also express love for truth.
251. In this dialogue, ever friendly and sincere, attention must always be paid to the essential bond between dialogue and proclamation, which leads the Church to maintain and intensify her relationship with non-Christians.[195] A facile syncretism would ultimately be a totalitarian gesture on the part of those who would ignore greater values of which they are not the masters. True openness involves remaining steadfast in one’s deepest convictions, clear and joyful in one’s own identity, while at the same time being “open to understanding those of the other party” and “knowing that dialogue can enrich each side”.[196] What is not helpful is a diplomatic openness which says “yes” to everything in order to avoid problems, for this would be a way of deceiving others and denying them the good which we have been given to share generously with others. Evangelization and interreligious dialogue, far from being opposed, mutually support and nourish one another.[197]
Evangelization and inter-faith dialogue are part of traditional ecclesiocentric mission. Mission is not only Christocentric but also Ecclesiocentric. It is necessary to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation, faith and baptism are needed by all (AG 7, CCC 845,846)
252. Our relationship with the followers of Islam has taken on great importance, since they are now significantly present in many traditionally Christian countries, where they can freely worship and become fully a part of society. We must never forget that they “profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, who will judge humanity on the last day”.[198] The sacred writings of Islam have retained some Christian teachings; Jesus and Mary receive profound veneration and it is admirable to see how Muslims both young and old, men and women, make time for daily prayer and faithfully take part in religious services. Many of them also have a deep conviction that their life, in its entirety, is from God and for God. They also acknowledge the need to respond to God with an ethical commitment and with mercy towards those most in need
253. In order to sustain dialogue with Islam, suitable training is essential for all involved, not only so that they can be solidly and joyfully grounded in their own identity, but so that they can also acknowledge the values of others, appreciate the concerns underlying their demands and shed light on shared beliefs. We Christians should embrace with affection and respect Muslim immigrants to our countries in the same way that we hope and ask to be received and respected in countries of Islamic tradition. I ask and I humbly entreat those countries to grant Christians freedom to worship and to practice their faith, in light of the freedom which followers of Islam enjoy in Western countries! Faced with disconcerting episodes of violent fundamentalism, our respect for true followers of Islam should lead us to avoid hateful generalisations, for authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence.
.
At the same time we must acknowledge that Vatican Council II II (AG 7) tells us that the followers of other religions need Catholic faith and the baptism of water for salvation from Hell.
254. Non-Christians, by God’s gracious initiative, when they are faithful to their own consciences, can live “justified by the grace of God”,[199] and thus be “associated to the paschal mystery of Jesus Christ”.[200] But due to the sacramental dimension of sanctifying grace, God’s working in them tends to produce signs and rites, sacred expressions which in turn bring others to a communitarian experience of journeying towards God.[201] While these lack the meaning and efficacy of the sacraments instituted by Christ, they can be channels which the Holy Spirit raises up in order to liberate non-Christians from atheistic immanentism or from purely individual religious experiences. The same Spirit everywhere brings forth various forms of practical wisdom which help people to bear suffering and to live in greater peace and harmony. As Christians, we can also benefit from these treasures built up over many centuries, which can help us better to live our own beliefs.
Non Christians are outside the Catholic Church (AG 7) Jesus’ Mystical Body, outside of which there is no salvation ( AG 7, CCC 845,846).Non Christians need to convert into the Catholic Church before death, to avoid the fires of Hell. This is the Conciliar teaching with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally i.e. Ad Gentes 7 is the norm for salvation while LG 8, 254. 16 are not explicit exceptions.
Social dialogue in a context of religious freedom
255. The Synod Fathers spoke of the importance of respect for religious freedom, viewed as a fundamental human right.[202] This includes “the freedom to choose the religion which one judges to be true and to manifest one’s beliefs in public”.[203] A healthy pluralism, one which genuinely respects differences and values them as such, does not entail privatizing religions in an attempt to reduce them to the quiet obscurity of the individual’s conscience or to relegate them to the enclosed precincts of churches, synagogues or mosques. This would represent, in effect, a new form of discrimination and authoritarianism. The respect due to the agnostic or non-believing minority should not be arbitrarily imposed in a way that silences the convictions of the believing majority or ignores the wealth of religious traditions. In the long run, this would feed resentment rather than tolerance and peace.
Since outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation ( Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II, CCC 846), to save souls from Hell, the Government must be Catholic as at the times of the Papal States in Europe, when non Catholics were given freedom to follow their religion.
- APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION EVANGELII GAUDIUM OF THE HOLY FATHER FRANCIS
TO THE BISHOPS, CLERGY, CONSECRATED PERSONS AND THE LAY FAITHFUL
ON THE PROCLAMATION OF THE GOSPEL IN TODAY’S WORLD
"Evangelii Gaudium": Apostolic Exhortation on …
Lionel Leslie Andrades
WHO AM I TO WRITE ALL THIS? : A BREAKTHROUGH ON VATICAN COUNCIL II. UNPRECEDENTED
WHO AM I TO WRITE ALL THIS? : A BREAKTHROUGH ON …
Imam Teaches Islam in Catholic Parish – Bishop in Attendance
When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally, Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. All.
We have now discovered that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical and invisble cases. So they do not contradict AG 7 or the dogma exrtra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So Vatican Council II (AG 7) is telling us that the Imam and Muslims in general are oriented to Hell without 'faith and baptism' and outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation ( AG 7, CCC 845,8246).
Mohammad knew about Jesus and the Catholic Church and yet he did not enter. The Council confirms ( LG 14) that he cannot be saved.
There are good things in other religions but the religions are not paths to salvation.The Holy Spirit can choose to work outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church but salvation is restricted to only Jesus' Mystical Body, the Roman Catholic Church.
The entire Italian Parliament rose to their feet to applaud as opposition member Elly Schlein praised …
Pope Leo was allowed by the Left to visit the African countries? He is not allowed to meet with orthodox Jewish rabbis, Marine Le Pen or Salvini. Is Italy still sovereirn and free ? He has to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally as approved by the globalist.The lady above who is approving Pope Leo's statement on Iran after he met with an aide of Obama, supports abortion, homosexual sex and other mortal sins which take a soul to live with Satan forever. Pope Leo has not announced that Catholics, morally cannot vote for her. Neither has the pope defended Carrie Prejean Boller who lost her job with the U.S Governement because she said 'CHRIST IS KING'.
The real doctrinal problem today is with Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez who use the LG 16 visible …
Vatican Council II in itself is neither traditional nor liberal. It depends how we interpret LG 8 etc, as being visible or invisible, explicit or implicit, objective or subjective, known or unknown.
When LG 8 etc refer to unknown and implicit cases then there is nothing in the Council-text to contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no known exceptions. Instead, Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation, is aligned with EENS while LG 8 etc are not explicit exceptions for AG 7 or EENS.
So Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and traditional. It has the hermeneutic of continuity with the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442, which did not mention any exceptions.
The Council is aligned with an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church, with no known exceptions, of the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX.
In the Catechism of Pope Pius X, 24Q and 27 Q (other religions are not paths to salvation and outside the Church there is no salvation) are not contradicted by 29Q (hypothetical cases of invincible ignorance.).
So we can accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally and also Tradition. They are not opposed to each other. It is no more either-or.
The real doctrinal problem today is with Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez who use the LG 16 visible …
When LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible and hypothetical cases only in 2026, this is the rational interpretation.
When LG 8 etc refer to visible and personally known people in 2026 this is the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
So LG 8, 14, 16 etc can refer to a physically visible or invisible case. It depends upon what you choose.
Cardinal Aveline: Latin Mass Catholics Must Accept Vatican II
Cardinal Aveline: Latin Mass Catholics Must Accept Vatican II
The Feeneyite traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center in Richmond, New Hampshire, USA, who attend only the Latin Mass, accept Vatican Council II but interpret it rationally, unlike Cardinal Aveline. They also accept the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally and traditionally unlike the French bishops. The French bishops and traditionalists in France should do the same. Vatican Council II irraitonal creates schism. Vatican Council II rational and ecclesiocentric has the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
Cardinal Aveline: Latin Mass Catholics Must Accept Vatican II
When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally it is traditional and ecclesiocentric. It is aligned with the ecclesiology of the Papal States in Europe. So in harmony with Tradition, it is in harmony with the Catholic Church of the 1930's.So Collegiality, Liturgy, Ecumenism, Mission, Dialogue etc are no more controversial for conservative Catholics.
Cardinal Aveline: Latin Mass Catholics Must Accept Vatican II
Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, is ecclesiocentric and traditional. It is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church, of the Syllabus of Pope Pius X. It is in harmony with all the Catechisms including the Cathechism of Pope Pius X and John Paul II, on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc.
Cardinal Aveline: Latin Mass Catholics Must Accept Vatican II
Yes Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally is approved by the Masons. But Vatican Council II interpreted rationally could be considered Anti Semitic or fundamentalist by the political Left.
"A Diabolical Disorientation in the Hierarchy of the Church" Bishop Bernard Fellay has declared that …
29.11.2025
BISHOP BERNARD FELLAY INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II LIKE ARCHBISHOP ANIBALE BUGNINI and the 'diabolical disorientation ' of the globalusts and the Left.
BISHOP BERNARD FELLAY INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL …
VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC. IT SUPPORTS THE ROMAN MISSAL
SEDEVACANTISM BASED UP0N VATICAN COUNCIL II IS NOW QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED) SEDEVACANTISM BASED UP0N VATICAN COUN
Dr Kwasniewski’s Interview with Matt Fradd
WHEN POPE LEO AFFIRMS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY HE AFFIRMS FEENEYITE EENS. THE COUNCIL IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC WITH NO EXCEPTIONS FOR TRADITION : 98 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
WHEN POPE LEO AFFIRMS VATICAN COUNCIL II …
Peter Kwasniewski on the SSPX consecrations
@Lionel Leslie Andrades
POPE LEO AND ARCHBISHOP VIGANO ARE CUSHINGITES. …
Il Vaticano indaga sul caso dei Redentoristi …
12.04.2026
POPE LEO INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II SCHISMATICALLY WITH THE LG 16 VISIBLE HERESY : CHANGES THE CREEDS AT HOLY MASS
POPE LEO INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II …
Cardinal Aveline: Latin Mass Catholics Must Accept Vatican II
He is referring to Vatican Council II irrational and not Vatican Council II rational. The Council interpreted rationally supports the traditionalists and not the liberal French bishops conference.
VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC. IT SUPPORTS THE ROMAN MISSAL
SEDEVACANTISM BASED UP0N VATICAN COUNCIL II IS NOW QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED) SEDEVACANTISM BASED UP0N VATICAN COUN
Dr Kwasniewski’s Interview with Matt Fradd
WHEN POPE LEO AFFIRMS VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY HE AFFIRMS FEENEYITE EENS. THE COUNCIL IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC WITH NO EXCEPTIONS FOR TRADITION : 98 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
WHEN POPE LEO AFFIRMS VATICAN COUNCIL II …
Peter Kwasniewski on the SSPX consecrations
@Lionel Leslie Andrades
POPE LEO AND ARCHBISHOP VIGANO ARE CUSHINGITES. …
Il Vaticano indaga sul caso dei Redentoristi …
Don Curzio Nitoglia: Americanist Plot Against the Roman Church
Do you agree ?
12.04.2026
POPE LEO INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II SCHISMATICALLY WITH THE LG 16 VISIBLE HERESY : CHANGES THE CREEDS AT HOLY MASS
Pope Francis did not tell Fr. Stefano Mannelli F.I that Vatican Council II supports Tradition.Pope Leo does not tell the SSPX that Cardinal Fernandez is in schism.
A nihil obstat and imprimatur are needed for Karl Rahner's books but also that of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger published by Igantius Press.
Why go for Pope Leo’s Holy Mass when he has changed the understanding of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms and no cardinal, bishop or priest can defend him?
Any journalist an confirm that with the LG 16 visible mistake, Pope Leo’s understanding of the Athanasius, Nicene and Apostles Creed is not the same as it was for the saints Augustine and Aquinas. There is also a rupture with the dogma extra cclesiam nulla salus of the Magisterium of the 16th century, for example. There is a schismatic break with the Magisterium of the Middle Ages.
On abortion, Pope Leo has said that ‘the teaching is still the same’ there is no change in doctrine. But on the Creeds the teaching is not the same for him and the popes from Pius XII. They have made the LG 16 visible mistake.
I wish someone could correct me. I am just a layman with no academic degrees in theology and philosophy and Pope Leo’s knowledge of the Church is far superior to mine.I was in two seminaries and a university in Rome and had to leave because of doctrine. I studied at a Catholic Institute of Theology in Karachi and taught Church History at the Minor Seminary in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. I noticed that the teaching in general was false. This false teaching has been part of Pope Leo’s religious formation in Chicago.
The teachings of the Catholic Church do not change for me and neither does objective reality - Heaven, Hell and Purgatory.
The discovery of mine is that Pope Leo uses the fake LG 16 reasoning, which produces a new theology, which is nontraditional, schismatic, dishonest and not Catholic.
He confuses what is implicit as being explicit and then produces a liberal conclusion. This is done in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
This error is there in Karl Rahner’s book, The Christian of the Future. It comprises talks Rahner gave in Germany in 1965.
This mistake is there throughout the world in the books on Vatican Council II published by Ignatius, Amazon, Angelus and the Oxford University Press.
With the LG 16 invisible theology the Catholic Church returns to the past as it is the liberals who are in schism.
Pope Francis did not tell Fr. Stefano Mannellis f.i about this when he closed down the Franciscans of the Immaculate seminary in Rome. Pope Leo is not telling the SSPX that it is Cardinal Fernandez who really is in schism. – Lionel Andrades
11. 04.2026
HOW CAN POPE LEO BE THE POPE?
HOW CAN POPE LEO BE THE POPE ?
POPE LEO INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II SCHISMATICALLY WITH THE LG 16 VISIBLE HERESY : CHANGES THE …
No .My Magisterium is Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church etc interpreted rationally, traditionally and honestly.It is in harmony with the Magisterium over the centuries. It is Apostolic.
Don Curzio Nitoglia: Americanist Plot Against the Roman Church
You have not answered the question or commented upon my statement. In the graphics the passages in red are hypothetical cases and the passages in blue orthodox cases. The passages in blue are aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442 and the hypothetical and invisible passages in red cannot be explicit exceptions for the dogma EENS or AG 7 .
Don Curzio Nitoglia: Americanist Plot Against the Roman Church
If you check the graphics on my channel on Gloria TV you can see that there are two interpretations of the Catechisms. Irrational or rational.
Don Curzio Nitoglia: Americanist Plot Against the Roman Church
I am referring to the baptism of desire being visible or invisible. It is there before you in red. Is Lumen Gentium 16, the reference to being saved in invincible ignorance a visible or invisible case of you this month ?. It is invisible for me. I cannot meet any saved as such. Neither can you. Would you agree ?
So the baptism of desire as to be an invisible case for us humans. If it is invisible can it be an objective exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus this month ? Are there any objective exceptions for you.?
Don Curzio Nitoglia: Americanist Plot Against the Roman Church
In the graphics above Don Nitroglia interprets 'the red as being an exception for the blue'? For me it is not. So he is irrational. Would you agree ?
It is common among the traditionalists. They all make the same error.
“The liturgy is not a flag”: the abbot of Fontgombault points to abuses and ideologies as the root …
The abbot of Fontgombault, Dom Jean Pateau interprets the baptism of desire irrationally. In the 16th century France, they interpreted the baptism of desire rationally.
So today the Athanasius Creed has visible exceptions of the baptism of desire for the abbot, but in 16th century France, at the TLM, there were no visible exceptions for the Athanasius Creed.
The interpretation of the dogma EENS, has exceptions for the Aboot but this was not the problem at Mass over the centuries. So the Mass offered by the Abbot is not theologically the same as that in the 16th century for example. He can correct the error by simply interpretating Vatican Council II rationally and so traditionally and not like the French Conference of Bishops.
Don Curzio Nitoglia: Americanist Plot Against the Roman Church
So there is no denial here. Don Curzio Nitoglia interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. He does the same with the Catechisms. This is political- left.