Statement Link - Guest Writers – Dr. Chojnowski Statement
@Instaurare Omnia in Christo I know, I did the same thing several times until it is sunk in.
Matt 2:18....A voice is heard in Ramah, weeping and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children …
@chris griffin I removed my comment that got abrupt with you, I'm sorry. I'm trying to understand what you wrote here today, Chris, I am not attacking you. So what I am gathering from all this is that you feel Our Lady should do what you want her to do and talk about abortion? And since Rachel cried about the Holy innocents and Mary has said nothing about abortion, therefore all her apparitions are false and Rachel is far more of a worthy anti-abortion advocate to you than anyone else; therefore, we should look up to Rachel as a biblical heroine. Would this be correct? I'll just leave it at that. I apologize again for being so assertive. I'll pray for you.
Matt 2:18....A voice is heard in Ramah, weeping and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children …
The apparitions of Our Lady have mostly been to warn us about turning away from God and the consequences in the future should we choose not to stop sinning. Why are you comparing a biblical woman such as Rachel to Our Lady in the first place? You should be ashamed of yourself. Our Lady is second to none compared to anyone who ever has or ever will exist. I will pray that her Son has Mercy on your soul.
Are All Young Catholics Qualified for Marriage?
No, they have authority -- to diagnose/cure and/or offer help and guidance. You have neither authority nor expertise and I question your common sense, or lack of it. Let's look at your first issue.
I do not support sodomy, however I do support recovery from it and what the Church teaches as forgiveness. If someone was a former gay man or a lesbian, they have made great effort to repent and regain their status in the Church, and have been graced with a healing (No, I'm not nor ever have been gay), and they find someone of the opposite sex they love and who loves them, by what common sense reasoning would you claim they should not get married? It happens all the time, do your research on those who have actually recovered through therapy and prayer (therapy which you seemed to discount in your common sense reasoning earlier). These people have gone on to live normal lives and raise families, some are now grandparents. I see no reason for them not to pursue family life.
2. There are thousands and thousands of people who are married who suffer from mental illnesses, anywhere from depression and anxiety disorders to ADHD. The whole idea behind treatment for mental illness is to bring these people back into society and help them live a normal life. If someone falls in love with someone else who suffers from mental illness, as long as they are aware of the issue, there is absolutely no reason for them not to get married and raise a family. The whole idea of falling in love is to accept who a person is, not who we wish them to be. Marriage was never meant to be skipping down the Yellow Brick road with a basket of flowers.
3. When it come to the "fat" issue. would you consider it outside your realm of common sense to state it might be a possibility that weight can be lost or gained after one is married?
I'll leave it at those three, because the short men point I find ludicrous. I do, however, get the distinct impression that all the issues you chose to disallow marriage, or recommend no marriage, are all issues which do not pertain to you. It is much like what we see with the issue of reducing the population for the climate hoax -- everyone else is on the ledger to go except those promoting the idea.
Finally, what you are proposing is "marriage of the fittest", marriage based on mental and physical perfection rather than "marriage based on love". When I read your blog entry, I found it disconcerting that someone calling themselves Catholic would be comfortable with posting something like this.. Be that what it is, humble it ain't.
Are All Young Catholics Qualified for Marriage?
You may think that is being entirely honest but I do not.
So by what authority are you making these claims? Are you a marriage counsellor or a psychologist?
Are All Young Catholics Qualified for Marriage?
I truly hope this is satire, or I'm all for disallowing bald men to blog. And if this upsets you. it should, because it is the identical thought process you are using for marriage.
Hollywood's Coven: Christopher Lee.
@Maria delos Angeles I was referring to Jim Caviezel and going from memory of the video, the only evidence presented against Caviezel was one picture of him in a similar position as a Christopher Lee photograph, which to the best of my knowledge is a common posture many people use and is not connected in anyway to anything Satanic. So for me it is very clear cut, keeping in mind that someone's opinion of one picture is not any type of solid evidence. You can believe that if you wish, I do not. If you have further information proving Caviezel is Satanic, I am more than happy to look at it.
Hollywood's Coven: Christopher Lee.
@canonist unfortunately, the internet allows for kooks to make videos and post them -- and someone will watch it and believe it. Jim Caviezel suffered greatly making The Passion. I don't think a Satanist would do that.
Andrea Riccardi: "Leo XIV Is Not Anti-Bergoglio But Francis’ Preferred Successor"
I don't think it is a coincidence that he is from the US, either.
Cardinal Mario Grech: Lay people could run parishes instead of priests
@English Catholic Me as well. In medical institutions, businesses, just about everywhere. Amen, brother!
Cardinal Mario Grech: Lay people could run parishes instead of priests
@English Catholic We are facing times when the lack of grace coming into the world will bring about a darkness few have seen, my friend.
I need some clarification on the email at the 30:10 mark. It seems like Mother is suggesting that this …
Hey Craig. This is more of an educated guess, but from my understanding if there is legitimate reason (Special circumstances) a person can receive the eucharist without attending the entire Mass. Traditionally speaking, a person can, however, only receive once in 24 hours.
For the NO, I believe Cannon Law was changed sometime in the 1980's where a person can receive twice, as long as they attend and participate in a full Mass the second time and not just receive It, for instance, if one is sitting in a hospital room with a family member and and the family member receives and you are asked if you would like to receive as well.
file:///home/chronos/u-9b6e9d9822e0329c315c7931caef653b79045584/MyFiles/Downloads/orgonite-ebook.pdf
Okay. I will bother you no more. God Bless