WHITE SMOKE 1958 -82- A FABLE
Before addressing the possible—if not probable—scenario of what happened in the 1958 conclave, we must first debunk a myth that the Freemasons have spread to serve as a smokescreen for what allegedly took place in that conclave. They claimed that Pius XII had been elected quickly but that he had requested a new ballot to be sure of his election, which makes no sense and is completely false since it goes against the very rules of the conclave. Moreover, the book cited above (fumee-blanche-26-10-1958.blogspot.com/2025/12/fum…) sets the record straight by explaining exactly what happened: La FUMÉE BLANCHE du 26 octobre 1958 : HABEMUS …
One might wonder why this absurd rumor was spread far and wide starting in 1958: could it be to cover up what actually happened in 1958, by pinning on Pius XII what in reality belongs to Judas II, in other words, Siri-Benedict XVI? And this is where we arrive at the aforementioned scenario, which I will attempt to decipher—not …Plus

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -81- DOCUMENTS
Before going any further, here are the various sources that cannot be disputed. [The links hidden under the titles are active only in the original French text above]
Documents proving the reality of the White Smoke on October 26, 1958, which announced the election of a Pope prior to the intrusion of Roncalli-John XXIII:
1- WIKI SUMMARY, October 26, 1958 (No. 3)
2- ASSOCIATED PRESS (No. 57)
3- IRISH INDEPENDENT (No. 58)
4- CHARLES-ROUX (No. 60)
5- THE TABLET (No. 61)
Additional documents proving the French government’s interference in favor of the election of the first intruder:
1- BERTRAND de MARGERIE (No. 77)
2- DE GAULLE’S ROLE (No. 86)
3- “Le MONDE” NEWSPAPER (No. 87)
Documents relating to Cardinal Siri:
1- 30 GIORNI (No. 79)
2- LOUIS-HUBERT RÉMY (No. 91)
3- The “HORRIBLE SECRET” (No. 93)
4- “SOUS la BANNIÈRE” (No. 94)
5- The MARQUIS de La FRANQUERIE (No. 95)
6- CARLO REGAZZONI (No. 101)
7- Saint PIUS X (No. 102)
8- PIUS XII (No. 103)
9- 1963 (No. 104) …Plus

WHITE SMOKE 1958 –80– BEFORE and DURING
In 1956, Pius XII asked Cardinal Siri to come to Rome: the Pope saw him as a potential successor, and no doubt wished to entrust him with high-level responsibilities within the Curia beforehand; but Siri declined the invitation, and Pius XII did not press the matter.
Before the 1958 conclave, Siri was asked to accept the papacy should he be elected; according to Father Spiazzi, Siri feared he might be designated to succeed Pius XII: ‘In 1958,’ he told Father Spiazzi, ‘I was asked, with authority, for my prior consent. I replied no. ’ And this is where the scenario begins, since in fact he did accept the election, as the white smoke attested. How could this have happened? The answer is simple: wanting not to be elected is one thing—as Saint Pius X experienced—and then finding oneself in the reality of the conclave is quite another. Saint Pius X understood this well, for he accepted the election and did not go back on his ‘Yes’, whereas Siri-Benedict …Plus

WHITE SMOKE 1958 –79– 30 DAYS
In an article entitled ‘Infiltrators? Yes…’, published in 30 Giorni in November 1991 (p. 55), we read:
‘It was February 1988. Two reporters from 30 Giorni were travelling to Genoa, a port city in northern Italy, to interview Cardinal Archbishop Giuseppe Siri [Benedict XVI] over two days. It was the year of the popes: the 30th anniversary of the death of Pius XII and the election of John XXIII, and the tenth anniversary of the election of John Paul II. No one was better placed than Siri, who had himself been a papabile during the three conclaves, to bear witness to the pontificates of these three successors of Peter. Siri was asked a question he had not expected, concerning the veracity of the periodic allegations that Freemasonry had infiltrated the Church. The elderly cardinal did not reply and, suggesting that he wished to make no public statement on the matter, he pointed to the tape recorder which was switched on. Then he made a very telling gesture with …Plus

1Partager1326TraduireIA

Plus

• Signaler
• Changer la publication
• Supprimer la publication

WHITE SMOKE 1958 –78– CONCOMITANCE
It is worth noting that two events of the utmost importance took place in 1958, events in which General de Gaulle played a dominant role.
The first was the establishment of the Fifth Republic in France, the eldest daughter of the Church, and whose architect was none other than de Gaulle: this took place on 13 May, the anniversary of the first apparition of the Blessed Virgin at Fátima.
The second, which took place in October, led to the establishment of the conciliar era: this was the famous conclave where, as mentioned above, De Gaulle—he again—took a role that might at first glance appear secondary but which in fact carried considerable weight in the fraudulent election of the first intruder.
Could these two concurrent events foreshadow a concurrent end to the Fifth Republic and the conciliar regime?
(Source: first comment)

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -77- BERTRAND de MARGERIE
The following document is irrefutable, but let us note once again that it was not De Gaulle who created John XXIII, but rather Benedict XVI, whom we should not hesitate to describe as Judas II, since he sold out the Church to protect his own interests so that, as he himself said shortly before his death, he would not have any problems with anyone.
"Archivum Historiae Pontificiae, Vol. 40 (2002), pp. 323–324
BERTRAND DE MARGERIE, S.J.
THE POSSIBLE ROLE OF GENERAL DE GAULLE
AND HIS AMBASSADOR
IN THE ELECTION OF BLESSED JOHN XXIII?
I have before me the autobiographical notes of my father, Roland de Margerie (who died in 1990). He had been ambassador to the Vatican since 1956 when Pope Pius XII died on 9 October 1958.
For many years, the major newspapers and press agencies had appointed contacts within the papal palace to keep them informed of the Supreme Pontiff’s state of health.
A whole system of signals (gestures, signs) behind the windows of …Plus

WHITE SMOKE 1958 –76– INTERFERENCE
It is worth noting that:
There was outside interference in the 1958 conclave, and not just any interference: De Gaulle! Indeed, the General used his ambassador to the Vatican to put pressure on the French cardinals to ensure that Roncalli, and subsequently Montini, were elected: he got exactly what he wanted! In fact, the French cardinals played along with the other cardinals, especially the Germans; and Tisserant, once validly elected as the successor to Pius XII—namely Siri-Benedict XVI—blocked him by citing, amongst other things no doubt, De Gaulle’s explicit wish, and the new Pontiff yielded to the pressure and resigned invalidly, as he was compelled to do, but employing subterfuges to bring down the other cardinals so that Roncalli might be elected—invalidly, of course—and the plan succeeded, and Benedict XVI reverted to being Siri by pledging allegiance to the intruder.
As for the death of Pius XII, it seems evident that his personal physician …Plus

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -75- The FINAL
And here is the final word:
- Just as Judas Iscariot betrayed Christ, so too did the successor to Pius XII (likely Giuseppe Siri—Benedict XVI) betray the Church on Christ the King Sunday, October 26, 1958, between 5:53 p.m. and 6:32 p.m.
- Just as Christ endured His Passion, so too has the Church endured hers, which has now lasted for 67 years.
- Just as Christ rose from the dead, so too will the Church rise again after the fall of the Antichrist.
- Just as Christ ascended into Heaven, so too will the Church ascend there after the Last Judgment, which will be preceded by the certain time of peace announced by Our Lady of Fatima.
* * *
Quick final summary:
White smoke did indeed appear on October 26, 1958, at 5:53 p.m., and the announcement of a new Pope was indeed made by Vatican Radio 9 minutes later, but the elected one did not appear; however, a new elected one appeared two days later, a sign that the first had secretly abdicated; what followed revealed …Plus

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -74- The KEY
Fifth and final point:
And here, to conclude, is the one and only true key to understanding the 1958 conclave, and I repeat, there is no other key but this one.
Indeed, here is a fact that any sensible person will understand: it has been 67 years since the 1958 conclave took place; who cares? Who remembers it? Who tries to find out exactly what happened? Almost no one! As a result, everyone thinks that the Catholic Church resides in the conciliar Church, and those who disagree either break away from it or form sects of varying sizes. And this, everyone can see, and no one can dispute it.
Here, then, is the key to understanding the 1958 conclave, and it is Jesus Christ Himself who reveals it to us when He speaks of false prophets. He says: “You will know them by their fruits.”
Since 1958—and I am writing this in 2025—the fruits are evident: they are all poisonous! And so the tree, as the Gospel tells us, is rotten. Now, the roots of this evil tree lie in the …Plus

1Partager289TraduireIA

Plus

• Signaler
• Changer la publication
• Supprimer la publication

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -73- A CLEAR INDICATION
Fourth point:
Why present the bare facts? Because they are irrefutable and cannot be called into question, being an expression of reality.
Thus, of the three necessary conditions, stated earlier, for an elected Pope to appear on the balcony, the third was missing for the man elected on October 26, 1958, since he did not appear. This means—and no one can deny it—that the cardinals did not pledge allegiance to him, for a reason we do not know. But the fact remains—and this is another indisputable fact—that the conclave continued, which means there was no violence, for otherwise the majority of the cardinals would not have accepted this continuation. So everything must have been done through insinuation, because:
- on the one hand, the new Pontiff was forced to abdicate,
- but on the other hand, this abdication appeared to be voluntary in the eyes of the cardinals, even if it was a bitter pill to swallow for some.
This coercion is evident; the new …Plus

1Partager1283TraduireIA

Plus

• Signaler
• Changer la publication
• Supprimer la publication

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -72- ABDICATION
Third point:
The abdication of the elected pope on October 26, 1958, did indeed take place, which allowed the conclave to continue and elect another pontiff. The certainty of this abdication—which is neither a hypothesis nor a conjecture—is corroborated by another fact that, too, cannot be disputed since it is verifiable.
Indeed, during the election of a Pope, before the elected candidate steps out onto the balcony, three things are absolutely necessary, namely:
- that he accepts,
- that he takes a name,
- and while the white smoke rises toward the sky, that he receives the first homage from all the cardinals.
And only then does he step out for the urbi et orbi blessing.
These three things occurred for John XXIII, which means that all the cardinals paid him homage, including the one elected on October 26, which means that the latter had indeed abdicated.
Everything I have stated in these three points cannot be disputed by anyone. The question remains as …Plus

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -71- TWO POPES
Second point:
What follows is just as certain as what has been stated above, namely:
- The 1958 conclave elected two Popes; we know of the first one because of the white smoke; we know of the second one because he appeared.
- How could the cardinals of the conclave have proceeded to elect two Pontiffs? Indeed, this is impossible. If they elected the second, the first must necessarily have abdicated.
- The successor to Pius XII, elected on October 26, 1958, therefore abdicated after accepting the election, and this abdication was recognized as valid by all the cardinals since the conclave continued to elect a new pontiff with the very participation as an elector of the one who had been elected.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
(Source: first comment)

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -70- VERIFIABLE FACTS
Let us therefore bring this epilogue to a close, which I shall do in several points.
First point:
What everyone knows about the 1958 conclave, as seen from the outside, namely:
- On Saturday 25 October at 4.30 pm, the conclave convened;
- On Sunday 26 October, the white smoke at 5.53 pm indicated that a Pope had been elected, as it continued for more than five minutes;
- Vatican Radio announced this election to the whole world;
- But the new Pontiff did not appear on the balcony to give his urbi et orbi blessing;
- Moreover, the conclave continued on 27 and 28 October;
- On the latter date, an hour after some greyish wisps of smoke, a new Pontiff appeared at 6.22 pm;
- He extended the conclave by one more day, namely 29 October.
All these facts are verifiable and cannot be disputed by anyone; opinions differ only in the interpretation of the facts.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
(Source: first comment)

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -69- SIRI THESIS
Before concluding this epilogue, let us say a few words about the Siri theory.
This theory holds that Cardinal Siri was elected Pope on 26 October 1958, which is probable, not because he declared it himself, but because he hinted at it on several occasions, albeit in a veiled manner; this probability borders very clearly on certainty.
According to this theory, he would have taken the name Gregory XVII, which is unlikely since, as I have said elsewhere, only the cardinals knew of this and none of them spoke out; furthermore, I have never found the source from which this information originated, upon which all the ‘Sirians’ have pounced. On the other hand, pieces of information I have found lead me to believe that he might have taken the name Benedict XVI: this is, of course, a conjecture, though one of more than average probability; moreover, his close friend Joseph Ratzinger, with whom he shared the hermeneutic of continuity, took—as if by chance—that …Plus

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -68- SUMMARY
It appears that in the year 2025, the same dates coincide, 67 years later, with those of the 1958 conclave. Let us summarise:
On Saturday 25 October, the conclave to elect a successor to Pius XII opened at 4.30 pm.
On Sunday 26 October, the Solemnity of Christ the King, a Pope—as we know from the white smoke—was elected as the successor to Pius XII. (Cardinal Siri? Most likely, but nothing more. Under the name Gregory XVII? Certainly false, as no cardinal spoke.) But he did not appear, and so he abdicated! Under duress? Yes, since one does not accept to abdicate immediately afterwards, and what is more, only before the cardinals, the faithful knowing nothing of it: this is the proof of proofs.
On Monday 27 October, the conclave continued despite the valid election of the previous day.
On Tuesday 28 October, the conclave irregularly elected an invalid pope, since two days earlier it had regularly elected a valid Pope.
On Wednesday 29 October, the first intruder …Plus

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -67- The TWO
Let us be clear:
Those who accept the validity of the election of 28 October 1958 are necessarily forced to disregard that of the 26th, as the two cannot coexist; indeed, one of the two must necessarily be invalid.
Thus, those for whom John XXIII is a true pope are forced to claim that there was no white smoke on 26 October, despite the evidence, and to do so, they have concocted a thousand subtleties, each as implausible and preposterous as the next—nonsense that is spread far and wide across the internet, whether by the mainstream or the traditionalists—and this is what makes the research work so difficult.
I am now easily convinced—and it is easy to be convinced when one conducts in-depth research as I do—that the Freemasons paid emissaries in all camps to publish anything and everything and to cover their tracks, so as to gloss over what could be seen from the outside, such as the white smoke, the absence of the new Pontiff on the balcony of St Peter’s …Plus

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -66- FALL
It is certain that if Pius XII’s successor had not fallen so miserably, we would not be where we are today, since there would be a Pope, and therefore all the current heresies would have been absolutely impossible: no Vatican II! And if there had been a council, it would have been a continuation of the Vatican Council, which had not been concluded.
But we must acknowledge that the man elected on 26 October 1958 did indeed fall: he heeded the sirens which, for all manner of reasons, led him to renounce his acceptance, and the smoke is there to tell us so, since after more than five minutes, it turned black and then white again, indicating that there was confusion around the stove following contradictory orders, and one might even say that there was certainly a scuffle, as Father Charles-Roux said, and that the vast majority of the ceremonialists were not infiltrated, as indeed were the majority of the cardinals. We saw the same scenario at Vatican II, where a …Plus

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -65- WHY
But then again, what problems could Pius XII’s successor possibly have had, since he held absolute power? This obviously seems anachronistic.
Indeed, having accepted the position, he could, with a single gesture or word, have put an end to any dissent or rebellion among certain cardinals and appeared on the balcony on October 26, 1958, to give his first urbi et orbi blessing. Why did he not do so, since two things are absolutely certain?
1) The white smoke and the announcement by Vatican Radio cannot be disputed by anyone: those who do so are acting in bad faith.
2) Despite this, the new Pope did not appear on the balcony, a fact that is not disputed by anyone.
Why is the second point not disputed, while the first is, since in reality they contradict each other?
Indeed, since there was white smoke and an announcement from Vatican Radio, the new Pontiff was supposed to appear, and he did not. And what did people take away from this? This:
Since he did not come,…Plus

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -64- EVIDENCE
Is it possible that a Pope could be elected and yet not appear before the crowd to give his first blessing? Certainly not!
Indeed, if Pius XII’s successor had not been elected on October 26, 1958, the smoke would have been black, and Vatican Radio would have immediately announced that the conclave was continuing.
However, the opposite occurred: white smoke and the announcement of the election.
Consequently, the new Pope should have appeared by 6:10 p.m. at the latest, which did not happen.
Two hypotheses must therefore be rejected as absurd:
- The first, that the ceremonial officials and Vatican Radio made a mistake;
- The second, that the cardinals prevented the new Pope from appearing on the balcony.
There is only one remaining possibility: the new Pope, after freely accepting the election, abdicated under duress “to avoid problems,” as a certain Cardinal Siri happened to say.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
(Source: first comment)

john3332

• Signaler
• Changer le commentaire
• Supprimer le commentaire

le mois dernier

Hearts of mankind turned into its self through memorising feats of technology
providence of God was thrown out the window replaced with the God of science ,.No matter who the Pope was in 1958 the tsunami of modernism wasn't stopping for no one

WHITE SMOKE 1958 -63- REFLECTION
The most important point to consider regarding the 1958 conclave—a point that no one dares to raise, yet must be raised—is that the white smoke was not a false alarm: a Pope was indeed elected around 5:50 p.m.; in fact, Vatican Radio clearly announced it around 6:00 p.m.; but here’s the thing: the new Pope never appeared! What’s more, the conclave continued in the days that followed.
Did the ceremonial officials make a mistake by putting dry straw in the stove instead of wet straw? Not at all!
Did Vatican Radio make a mistake by announcing Habemus Papam? Not at all!
We must therefore conclude that something serious happened, and that is where imaginations have concocted scenarios that make no sense.
The only valid explanation is that the Pope resigned under duress to make way for an intruder: the Guardian of the Obstacle was defeated in 40 minutes.
If we are not convinced by this undeniable outward sign, the fruits that have come of it must convince us:…Plus