Fatima priests Gruner and Kramer: Benedict’s resignation invalid - Bergoglio was NOT Pope
Daniel 11:23: Through his accomplices, he will act with deceit.
The Magisterium of the Church teaches that the elevation of a heretic to the papacy is invalid and null. Since Pope Benedict did not renounce the papal *office*—but rather the *exercise* of the episcopate of Rome—it is established that there was no apostolic succession; this means that all of Bergoglio's acts, including the election of bishops, are invalid and null, as are his false canonizations and his heretical pamphlets—such as the pro-homosexual pamphlet *Fiducia Supplicans*, and the pro-adultery, pro-fornication, and pro-cohabitation pamphlet *Amoris Laetitia*. Now, this is significant because the fraudulent conclave that elected Prevost was infested with heretics.—including Prevost himself, who adhered to the Marxist liberationist current of Gustavo Gutiérrez in Peru, where he was a member of the heretical Latin American Augustinians: an apostate group that worships the Pachamama and promotes a false, "inculturated"…More
The Church teaches that all acts performed by an antipope are invalid. Prevost is neither a pope nor a bishop. Prevost had already subscribed to Bergoglio's heresy, in addition to his heretical past in Peru, where he not only worshipped Pachamama but also spearheaded a Marxist agenda based on the Marxist liberation theology of the arch-heretic and apostate Gustavo Gutiérrez—of unhappy memory.
But Prevost didn't say Christ is irrelevant. He can be a catholic. Who knows. We must believe it because he was declared the pope, while no other one was already the pope. So let's call him the pope in a very heavily damaged office.
@Michele Indietrista The Magisterium of the Church has decreed that all acts performed by a false pope are invalid and null—such as canonizations, the appointment of bishops, and documents like the pamphlets promoting sins of sexual immorality, specifically *Fiducia Supplicans* and *Amoris Laetitia* or that promotes the violation of the First Commandment and polytheism—under the guise of religious freedom, as in Abu Dhabi.. Anyone who has not received apostolic succession is merely a charlatan. Consequently, Robert Prevost never truly became a bishop. It is well known that Robert Prevost was indoctrinated in Chicago in the Marxist pseudo-theology of Gutiérrez—as attested by the apostate Marxist Augustinian Arturo Purcaro (of Chulucanas), who served as the coordinator of the Marxist Gathering of Conocoto. So he belongs to that group of Marxists who infiltrated the seminaries: individuals known to have been both Freemasons and homosexuals. Indeed, Prevost’s agenda—much like Bergoglio’s—is precisely Marxist, Masonic, and pro-sodomitical. And this heretical and apostate past of Prevost disqualifies him from being a valid candidate for the papacy. After this news became public, Prevost has not issued the public retraction required by the Church; and even if he were to do so, it would be of no avail, for it would signify that he was already disqualified. For neither heretics, nor apostates, nor schismatics—such as Prevost—can become Pope, since the Church teaches that no one can be the head of a body of which he is not a member. And these sins sever the heretic from the Body of Christ, which is the Church. Furthermore, no priest could absolve these sins, for there are certain sins that can be absolved only by a Pope.
Apostate Marxist Augustinian Arthur Purcaro : Gutiérrez was a personal friend of mine; I invited him to Chulucanas to accompany us on our journey and to keep alive the "preferential option for the poor"—which, at Puebla, was recognized as a distinct pastoral choice. His thought—beginning with his book *A Theology of Liberation*—came under scrutiny, even in the United States; yet, when I was teaching in Chicago, I offered courses on this theological perspective, and the classroom was always packed.
“A doubtful pope is no pope.” — Canon Law, 1943
Wernz-Vidal — Canon Law, 1943
“Through notorious and openly divulged heresy, the Roman Pontiff, should he fall into heresy, by that very fact (ipso facto) is deemed to be deprived of the power of jurisdiction even before any declaratory judgment by the Church... A Pope who falls into public heresy would cease ipso facto to be a member of the Church; therefore, he would also cease to be head of the Church.” And also: “A doubtful pope is no pope.”
F.X. Wernz, P. Vidal: “Finally they cannot be numbered among the schismatics, who refuse to obey the Roman Pontiff because they consider his person to be suspect or doubtfully elected on account of rumours in circulation.” (Ius Canonicum, 7:398, 1943)