Addressing Misinterpretations of Vatican Council II and Its Impact on Catholic Doctrine in Texas
21 May 2025 Addressing Misinterpretations of Vatican Council II and Its Impact on Catholic Doctrine in Texas
In Texas, the State could legally be informed that the Catholic bishop interprets Vatican Council II dishonestly and misleads people. May be it is due to ignorance.The aim is not to condemn, litigate or judge the bishop’s character or personality but to make him admit that he is dishonest in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. It is the same with Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and the judges of the Supreme Tribunal (Signatura), Vatican.
The bishop must admit that his interpretation of Vatican Council II with a fake premise ( invisible people are visible in 2025) is political and not apostolic.
Also Cardinal Fernandez and the judges of the Vatican Signatura must admit that the 1983 Code of Canon Law; the new canon law, is obsolete, since it is has its foundation upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.The Council could have been interpreted rationally but it was …More
Our Carmel is also the Carmel of the Holy Trinity! Thank you for supporting our Carmelites!
Yes. St. Teresa of Avila held the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). She did not project invisible cases of the baptism of desire as being visible exceptions for EENS.In the middle ages the Church was rational. They knew that the baptism of desire etc referred to invisble cases in our reality. This was a given. Now if Bishop Olsen admits this then he is saying that invisble cases of LG 14 are not visible exceptions for EENS according to the Carmelite tradition, which Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) is in harmony with the exclusivist ecclesiology of Carmel.When asked he does not respond.
@Lionel Leslie Andrades I find your tack interesting! God bless our Carmel's! Thank you for promoting and defending them! Saint Therese shower you with Graces! God bless you!