POPE LEO’S PRESENT INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IS HERETICAL AND SCHISMATIC AND DISQUALIFIES …
18.01.2026
POPE LEO’S PRESENT INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IS HERETICAL AND SCHISMATIC AND DISQUALIFIES HIM FROM OFFERING HOLY MASS
Thousands of priests and religious sisters gave up their vocation after 1965 since Vatican Council II was schismatic and not traditional. They did not know about the implicit-explicit confusion. Pope Paul VI, Rahner, Ratzinger and Lefebvre did not tell them about it. The Council was really traditional without the subjective-objective error.
Pope Benedict maintained the lie in Karl Rahner’s book The Christian of the Future . He supported the New Theology based upon implicit cases of the baptism of desire being explicit exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Council of Trent. Unknown cases of being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) were projected as known exceptions for Augustine and Aquinas on outside the Church there is no salvation.
Archbishop Lefebvre was excommunicated because he did not accept Vatican Council …More
We do not need to interpret "Vatican II" just - as late Fr. Hesse used to say - throw it where it belongs i.e. to the trash can.
No Catholic needs "Vatican II" for anything as orthodox passages of "conciliar documents" can be found elsewhere in the Catholic Magisterium and heterodox like e.g.:
"According to the almost unanimous opinion of believers and unbelievers alike, all things on earth should be related to man as their center and crown" (GS 12)
"For men who believe in Christ and have been truly baptized are in communion with the Catholic Church even though this communion is imperfect..... It follows that the separated Churches and Communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have been by no means deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Church." (UR 3)
"Religions, however, that are bound up with an advanced culture have struggled to answer the same questions by means of more refined concepts and a more developed language. Thus in Hinduism, men contemplate the divine mystery and express it through an inexhaustible abundance of myths and through searching philosophical inquiry. They seek freedom from the anguish of our human condition either through ascetical practices or profound meditation or a flight to God with love and trust. Again, Buddhism, in its various forms, realizes the radical insufficiency of this changeable world; it teaches a way by which men, in a devout and confident spirit, may be able either to acquire the state of perfect liberation, or attain, by their own efforts or through higher help, supreme illumination. Likewise, other religions found everywhere try to counter the restlessness of the human heart, each in its own manner, by proposing "ways," comprising teachings, rules of life, and sacred rites. The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions." (NA 2)
must be rejected.
But if the Council interpreted rationally is orthodox, magisterial and apostolic.So why throw it out? We can throw VC 2 irrational in the trash can.