LUMEN GENTIUM 14 AND LUMEN GENTIUM 16 ARE HYPOTHETICAL: FERNANDEZ WAS IN SCHISM AND NOT VIGANO’S …

31.10.2025
LUMEN GENTIUM 14 AND LUMEN GENTIUM 16 ARE HYPOTHETICAL: FERNANDEZ WAS IN SCHISM AND NOT VIGANO’S TRADITION: A RE –TRIAL IS NEEDED BY POPE LEO
An appeal has to be made to Pope Leo pointing out that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2 GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 1965-2025.So they do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX etc. It was Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez who was not affirming the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition. He was interpreting Vatican Council II, irrationally. LG 8,14, 16 etc referred to visible exceptions for the dogma EENS etc, fr hm. He did not affirm and EENS and neither Vatican Council II, rational (LG 16 invisible), during the trial for schism of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano..
So for Archbishop Vigano to accept Vatican Council II, Pope Leo must clarify that LG 8, 14, 16 etc refer to hypothetical cases only. They do not contradict the Creeds, Councils and …More