7th Sept. 2026
FOR CARDINAL TURKSON ISLAM IS NOT A PATH TO SALVATION AND MOHAMMAD IS LOST ACCORDING TO VATICAN COUNCIL II: MOTHER TERESA FEAST DAY
Cardinal Peter Turkson co-offered Holy Mass on Saturday the feast of Mother Teresa at the Casa Serena chapel of the Missionaries of Charity Contemplative Brothers of Mother Teresa in Rome. The M.C brothers and sisters were present.
Later, there was a social. I did not speak to the cardinal. I don’t have to. I keep referring to the text of Vatican Council II (AG 7).He has to accept it.
So like the M.C priests Fr. Roman Lustiner, Fr. Sebastian Vazhakhala and from Germany, Fr. Jan Timor Pawelka, they all are saying that Islam is not a path to salvation ( AG 7) and Muslims and others are oriented to the fires of Hell, without Catholic faith and the baptism of water ( AG 7, CCC 845,846). Vatican Council II is aligned with the Society of the St. Pius X (SSPX) on Islam.
VOCATIONS AND VATICAN COUNCIL II
The M.C priests can be contacted at Via San Agapito, near the Red Cross office, at Largo Preneste/Termini, Rome. The tram n. 5 stop is at Acqua Bulicante. They are available to answer questions for those who have a religious vocation.
They have the rational understanding of Vatican Council II. It would be the same for Pope Leo XIV and Cardinal Turkson, when they cite the Bible, the Councils and Catechisms interpreted only rationally.
NICENE CREED THE SAME FOR ALL
In the Nicene Creed, we pray, ‘I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins’. This refers to the baptism of water (CCC 1257). The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are known only to God. The baptism of water is the norm for salvation.
In the Nicene Creed, we pray, ‘one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church’. For me this means outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation (AG 7, CCC 846 etc).This is the pre and post Conciliar Church. So Cardinal Turkson affirms Vatican Council II (AG 7) like Fr. Davide Pagliarani, the Superior General of the SSPX. AG 7 is the same for all.
Even the Nicene Creed has to be interpreted rationally by all.
The Athanasius Creed has no exceptions mentioned in hypothetical cases of LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc for Cardinal Turkson, Pope Leo and the SSPX.
Theoretical cases of LG 8, 14, 16 etc cannot be practical exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), of the Council of Florence 1442.
WIKIPEDIA ENTRIES FALSE
The Wikipedia entries on Fr. Leonard Feeney, Vatican Council II etc confuse theoretical cases of the baptism of desire etc as being practical exceptions for EENS. This was the mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to the Jesuit priest Fr. Leonard Feeney, who was orthodox and rational on EENS, the baptism of desire etc.
Fr. Karl Rahner sj in his book, The Christian of the Future made the same mistake. He confused invisible cases of LG 16 etc as being exceptions for the dogma EENS. This has become the Cardinal Ratzinger Mistake which was kept hidden from the SSPX and the Ecclesia Dei traditionalists. The Council supports the traditionalists and is not in schism with the Church Fathers and the Apostles.
- Lionel Andrades