15.01.2026
NEW CHARLOTTE-FILM MUST SHOW HOW THE BISHOP INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY AND SCHISMATICALLY
Peter Kwasniewski is not formally telling the bishops in Charlotte, San Antonio, Detroit etc that 1) the blue passages in Vatican Council II dominate 2) the red is not an exception for the blue 3) the Rational Premise and Inference must be chosen 4) Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms must be interpreted with an invisible and not visible baptism of desire (LG14) and the conclusion is traditional.
So from where does the liberalism of the bishops still come from? Not Vatican Council II, anymore!
Kwasniewski is not saying this in his conversations with Larry Chapp and disciples of Balthazar, Rahner and Ratzinger, who used the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, as Kwasniewski does today.
At the Consistory Pope Leo did not tell the cardinals to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms with only the Rational Premise and so then affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus etc. He did not tell the cardinals to affirm the rational premise and inference, in general, in harmony with Tradition. Instead cardinals, Roche, Fernandez and others presented papers, on the liturgy, faith etc, with Magisterial Documents interpreted unethically and politically.
Pope Leo and the cardinals, interpret Vatican Council Ii irrationally as did Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops, priests and lay supporters.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre used the Irrational Premise and Inference and so there is no opposition, on this point, from the Lefebvrist line of traditionalists today.
But imagine it- a consistory was called and the pope did not point out a major error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Joseph Shaw and Una Voce, Roberto dei Mattei and Correspondenza Romano, John Henry Westen and LifeSite News and Michael Matt at the Remnant News, are prudently silent.
They will continue to interpret LG 16 etc irrationally as long as they do not have to affirm the Athanasius Creed with no known exceptions, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no objective exceptions and an ecumenism of return of the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX with no known exceptions in 2026.
Taylor Marshall continues to allow Catholics to remain in error on Vatican Council II as long as he is not banned on social media by the Left.
The Catholic Truth Society interprets Vatican Council II irrationally in London and so does Una Voce and the Latin Mass Societies as did Michael Davies and the traditionalists in Britain.
The traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like Pope Paul VI and cardinals Roche and Fernandez and not like me.
In general everyone is looking after his own territory and so do not interpret Vatican Council II non schismatically
.
We now know that there is an apostolic and magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and Inference whose conclusion is traditional and ecclesiocentric. The Catholic Church comes back to Tradition at every liturgy and rite.The teachings of the Catholic Church do not change.
Peter Kwasniewski is not formally telling the bishops in Charlotte, San Antonio, Detroit etc that 1) the blue passages in Vatican Council II dominate 2) the red is not an exception for the blue 3) the Rational Premise and Inference must be chosen 4) Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms must be interpreted with an invisible and not visible baptism of desire (LG14) and the conclusion is traditional.So from where does the liberalism of the bishops still come from? Not Vatican Council II, anymore!
Kwasniewski is not saying this in his conversations with Larry Chapp and disciples of Balthazar, Rahner and Ratzinger, who used the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, as Kwasniewski does today. Kwasniewski does not affirm the Catholic Faith in public to protect his career, status and family interests?
A new Charlotte-film has to be produced which shows how the bishop interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, like the SSPX, when he uses the Irrational Premise, while there is a rational and traditional option available. This is schism and heresy.There are new versions of the Creeds at the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass.…- Lionel Andrades