POPE LEO HIDES RATZINGER’S SECRET FROM FR. DAVIDE PAGLIARANI: AG 7 IS ALIGNED WITH EENS AND LG 16 IS NOT AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION FOR AG7 AND EENS. VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC









01.07.2026
POPE LEO HIDES RATZINGER’S SECRET FROM FR. DAVIDE PAGLIARANI: AG 7 IS ALIGNED WITH EENS AND LG 16 IS NOT AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION FOR AG7 AND EENS. VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC
Pope Leo did not give out the Ratzinger Secret to Fr.Davide Pagliarani. It is: Ad Gentes 7 is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Council of Florence 1442) while LG 8, 14, 16 etc are not objective exceptions for EENS or AG 7. Vatican Council II is traditional and not liberal.
Vatican Council II is aligned with the traditionalists. Pope Leo is in schism with LG 16 projected as a visible exception for EENS and AG 7. This is irrational. It is not tradition. It is not part of the deposit of the faith. It is not magisterial and apostolic. We now know that it is now Vatican Council II, which says outside the Church there is no salvation (AG 7). AG 7 is placed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church under the tile outside the Church no Salvation. (846). This was Ratzinger’s Secret. The Council really is ecclesiocentric.
He hid this from Michael Davies and Una Voce. He hid it from Fr. Leonard Feeney. He did not disclose it to Archbishop Lefebvre before the excommunication. He could not say that the Council was traditional and the liberals Congar, Lubac, Balthazar, Rahner, Kung and others, his friends, were in public schism. They were in public schism with LG 14 an LG 16 allegedly being explicit exceptions for EENS. They were rejecting the dogma EENS, the Nicene Creed (with LG 16 invisible) and the Athanasius Creed etc, in the original.
The media today still maintains the Secret after being informed. They want the pope to say that Vatican Council II is liberal and a break with Tradition.
When the Council says all need faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7) and there are no known exceptions mentioned in LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA, GS 22 etc, then the ecclesiology today is the same as that of the Papal States in Europe.
So it is wrong for Pope Leo to hide this information. He projects Vatican Council II as schismatic and liberal and then accuses the SSPX of being in schism and is ready to excommunicate them, for not affirming an irrational and schismatic version of the Council. While he himself rejects a rational and traditional interpretation of Vatican Council II.
It is no more a secret. There are so many reports on line on this issue.
The SSPX must interpret Vatican Council II rationally. This was not known to Archbishop Lefebvre. , Michael Davies, Una Voce, Roberto dei Mattei, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, Christopher Ferrara, Plineo Correa D’Oliveira and others.

Pope Leo still does not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and he is going to excommunicate the SSPX?
All Catholics, and not only the SSPX, have a moral obligation not to interpret Vatican Council II like Pope Leo. It is heretical and schismatic. It is a break with popes of the Middle Ages, The Church Fathers and the Apostles. – Lionel Andrades
321