An Exorcist Reveals the Truth About Demons
youtube.com/watch?v=mX7L68p9exk
Interview with an Exorcist (Fr Vincent Lampert)
An exorcist in the Catholic Church must be a priest who has been granted that faculty (jurisdiction). If the new rite of consecration (of a bishop) was invalid then there would be exorcists today who are not priests. If that were case then the demon who possessed a person would know the exorcist had no power and would reveal that fact (see the Fr. Lampert interviews on Pints with Aquinas). But Fr. Lampert’s exorcisms have been successful, so he must have been validly ordained by a bishop (Abp. O'Meara) consecrated with the NRoC (1981). Therefore Abp. Vigano/Bp. Williamson’s claim that there’s a doubt regarding the validity of the NRoC is demonstrably false.
All celebrity exorcists incur the same doubts (Amorth, Ripperger, etc).
As always, you’re totally incapable of any rational reasoning.
If the NROC is invalid then there’s no bishop and, therefore, no priest, and so no exorcist to perform a solemn exorcism of the Church, which necessarily means no casting out demons of those possessed. But if this was the case it would be easily demonstrable since any demon would know of the priest’s invalid ordination and would claim the priest had no power to cast him out. And since practically all diocesan priests today have been ordained by a NROC bishop there would be no successful exorcisms pretty much anywhere.
Now if traditional priests (FSSP/ICKSP/SSPX) were called to cases where N.O. priests had failed, and cast out the demons, it would be easy to demonstrate a pattern, since the number of cases is only ever growing. And wouldn’t these traditional group(s) have duty to publicize this pattern? But this has not happened - nor will it.