26.10.2026
REUTERS INDICATES FERNANDEZ, CUPICH AND MARX ARE IN SCHISM WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II SUPPORTING THE TRADITIONALISTS
Fernandez, Cupich and Marx are in schism. Vatican Council II supports the traditionalists.
It is obligatory for the cardinals to accept the dogma EENS, the Nicene Creed (rational) and other de fide teachings, which no more have exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II.
When Fernandez, Cupich, Radcliffe, McElroy and others do not affirm EENS etc, canonically, they are in public schism. They can no more say that Vatican Council II has exceptions. The Council is now interpreted rationally (LG 16 invisible).
Reuters which would attack the SSPX is no more defending the cardinals in the name of Vatican Council II, irrational.
Reuters indicates that with LG 8,14,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc invisible in Vatican Council II, Cardinals Fernandez, Cupich, Radcliffe, Grech, Hollerich. Muller and Marx are in schism when they do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, an ecumenism of return of the Syllabus and the Nicene Creed interpreted rationally. AI on X and Google confirm that Pope Leo is in schism with an irrational interpretation of LG 16 etc. Vatican Council II no more has practical exceptions for the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of the 16th century.
With Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) aligned with the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442 – which is accepted by the SSPX , SBC , F.I and others – we do not have any practical exceptions for EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc. This is the big change.
So the traditionalists affirm the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442, with no exceptions, the Athanasius Creed, with no exceptions etc, but Cardinals Fernandez, Cupich and others do not do the same.
For Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church of the Syllabus was obsolete with ‘visible exceptions’ mentioned in Unitatus Redentigratio.
For Pope Benedict, extra ecclesiam nulla salus was no more like it was for the missionaries of the 16th century. There was a development with ‘visible exceptions’ mentioned in Nostra Aetate and Lumen Gentium 16.
But now there is a new discovery.
Even Phillip Pullela and Joshua McElwee at Reuters agree that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc in Vatican Council II are always invisible cases and so cannot be practical objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed etc.
Vatican Council II is no more liberal. It does not support the liberal theology of the Synods. So the SSPX was not obliged to accept the liberal and irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II by Pope Leo XIV, to avoid the excommunication. With LG 16 etc invisible, Pope Leo and the SSPX wouod be affirming the same Vatican council II, aligned with the dogma EENS with no exceptions, the Athanasius Creed with no exceptions and a Vatican council II with no exceptions for the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal of the 16th century. - Lionel Andrades
24.10.2026
REUTERS INDICATES VATICAN COUNCIL II ( RATIONAL ) SUPPORTS THE PONTIFICUM SUMMORUM GROUPS
24.10.2026 REUTERS INDICATES VATICAN COUNCIL II …
______________________________
Ask A. I for a time line on Lionel Andrades. If anything is still unclear I am there to answer your questions. E-mail me.
Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally are now apostolic and magisterial. They are a doctrinal measure for the popes, cardinals, bishops and priests.
Traditionalists (SSPX, SBC etc) can simply affirm Vatican Council II and expect the pope to do the same. Morally, there is only the rational interpretation. There cannot be excommunications based upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.