FR.MICHAEL MARY SUPERIOR GENERAL OF THE TRANSALPINE REDEMPTORISTS MUST CITE THE RATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II TO DEFEND HIMSELF : CARDI. FERNANDEZ AND BISHOP GILBERT COULD VC2 IRRATIONAL AGAINST THE TRADITIONALISTS IN SCOTLAND
On May 26, 2026 I wrote to Fr.Michael Mary fssr, Superior General of the Transalpine Redemptorists.
I mentioned that there was a new discovery of mine with reference to Vatican Council II. It is not new in the sense that Cardinal Ratzinger knew about it and so did Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez. They knew that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II referred to physically invisible cases in 1965-2026. This was a hidden secret. It allowed them to move freely and support the Left and penalize the traditionalist. Part of the secret was that Vatican Council II supported the traditionalists when LG 8, 14, 16 etc referred to invisible and hypothetical cases.
We now have a rational and irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II with my discovery of their secret. We have a choice on Vatican Council II. We simply do not have to accept only their irrational and schismatic version of the Council. Over time the people will learn about it.
Now Bishop Hugh Gilbert and Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez will use the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II to declare you to be in schism. They will not announce that there is a Vatican Council II which is in harmony with Tradition and so it is their irrational version which is obsolete. It is there irrational interpretation which is schismatic. This is exposed for all when the Council is interpreted rationally. I explain it here in this report. 1
Fr. Davide Pagliarani’s Declaration of Faith is made obsolete with Vatican Council II irrational (LG 16 visible) but is aligned with Vatican Council II rational (LG 16 invisible). It is the same with your Open Letters. They are made obsolete with Vatican Council II irrational. It is you who will be in schism for not accepting Vatican Council II irrational and schismatic.
This was the approach of Pope Francis during the schism-trial of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano. This was the approach of Cardinal Fernandez during the excommunication of the Discalced Carmelite Nuns in Arlington, Texas etc. The DDF is consistent. This was also the approach of Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj.
We have now discovered that the way to get out of this situation is for you to affirm Vatican Council II rational and continue to reject the Vatican Council II irrational of the Diocese of Aberdeen and that of the Vatican.
With Vatican Council II rational the tables are turned in favor of the traditionalist. The conclusion is traditional.
It is also simple. You have to interpret LG 8, 14, 16, etc as being implicit, invisible, theoretical and unknown cases in 2026. This is something obvious said Fr. Aldo Rossi, a former Prior of the SSPX at Albano, Italy. LG 8 etc can only be hypothetical. We cannot know of any practical case. There is no practical case in our human reality. As I mentioned before, if any one was saved as such it would only be known to God.
So when you all at Papa Stronsay agree that LG 8, 14, 16. UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only, please announce it .
The rational interpretation is simple. With Ad Gentes 7 (all need faith and baptism for salvation), Vatican Council II is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442 which did not mention any exceptions. While, LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not explicit exceptions; they are not practical exceptions for AG 7 or EENS or the Athanasius Creed or the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal.
So with this Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II you will be affirming the Council and Tradition.
With this Rational Interpretation you can expose the Irrational Interpretation of the bishop in Aberdeen and the Vatican.
IRRATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II
The Irrational Interpretation is unethical, we now know, since there is a rational option.
It begins with the affirmation of LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as being physically visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times. So they are allegedly explicit exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the ecumenism of return of the Syllabus of Pius IX, the teaching on outside the Church there is no salvation in all the Catechisms etc. So tradition is made obsolete. There are exceptions. So there is a new ecclesiology for the Vatican. There is a new salvation-theology for the Vatican. It says outside the Catholic Church there is known salvation. So Vatican Council II interpreted, by confusing what is implicit as being explicit, produces a new ecclesiology, then why cannot the Eucharist be given to the divorced and remarried at Holy Mass, asked Cardinal Walter Kasper.
Pope Francis and Pope Leo have asked, that the Church do away with Tradition. Since Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally has made Tradition obsolete. There are exceptions for the dogma EENS etc, so why have traditional ecclesiocentric mission when non Catholics are being saved outside the Church (visible LG 16)?
Why proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King when people are saved outside the Church (LG 14 visible etc)?
Why must Catholics not divorce when Protestants divorce and they will be saved in their religion outside the Church according to Vatican Council II (UR 3) ? UR 3 is not contradicted by anything in the Council-text.While UR 3 is an exception for AG 7.This is the dishonest reasoning that you are now upfront with.
If you do not affirm Vatican Council II rational in harmony with Tradition, they will close you down with the support of the leftist secular authorities in Scotland.
You have to expose the irrational interpretation of L G 14 and LG 16 etc in the interpretation of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms and then suggest that the main line Church must interpret Vatican Council II only rationally. You must announce that you will not submit to a schismatic Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez, on Vatican Council II. The Council is the forte of the traditionalists. You are no more a traditionalist who interprets the Council only irrationally like Pope Paul VI, Cardinal Ottaviani, Archbishop Lefebvre, Karl Rahner sj, Joseph Ratzinger, Hans Urs Balthazar etc.
The tables have turned in your favour. You are affirming the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church in harmony with Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally.
You are free to cite my reports on Gloria TV or X. There is no payment to be made. Permission is granted.
So please let me know what you’ll have decided.
In Christ
Lionel Andrades
1
16.05.2026
Fr. Davide Pagliarani’s Declaration of Faith is made obsolete with Vatican Council II irrational (LG 16 visible) but is aligned with Vatican Council II rational (LG 16 invisible).
Fr. Davide Pagliarani’s Declaration of Faith is …
_______________________________________
Today news has reached the Diocese of Aberdeen that the Superior General of the Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer, V. Rev. Fr Michael Mary, F. Ss.R, intends to be consecrated as a bishop on 25th July on the island of Papa Stronsay in Orkney. This ordination would be celebrated without a papal mandate, by a group of bishops who deny that Our Holy Father Pope Leo XIV is actually the pope.
Since this consecration is due to take place within the geographical boundaries of the Diocese of Aberdeen, I am obliged to make clear to the faithful of the Diocese that any such episcopal ordination would be unlawful and a grave act of disobedience, separating those taking part from communion with the Catholic Church. No member of the faithful should attend. This action is not “for the good of the Catholic Church” as is falsely claimed.
This development is greatly to be regretted and we can only pray that those concerned have a change of heart.
+Hugh Gilbert OSB
Statement on the Proposed Episcopal Consecration …