Lionel Leslie Andrades

POPE LEO AGREES WITH ME : NO DENIAL FROM THE HOLY SEE PRESS OFFICE

11.03.2025
POPE LEO AGREES WITH ME : NO DENIAL FROM THE HOLY SEE PRESS OFFICE
Pope Leo agrees with me. Lumen Gentium 16 is a hypothetical case while Ad Gentes 7 is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Athanasius Creed. LG 8, 14, 16 etc are not explicit exceptions for AG 7, EENS etc. Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and traditional with the hermeneutic of continuity with the Syllabus of Pius IX and the Catechisms of Baltimore, Pius X and Trent. The lex orandi is Feeneyite and not Cushingite.
There is no denial from Paulo Ruffini the Prefect of the Dicastery for Communications and neither from Archbishop Rino Fisichella pro-prefect for the New Evangelization Section of the Dicastery for Evangelization.
Cardinals Cupich, Roche, Zuppi, Baldasarre, Hollerich, Grech, Radcliffe and McElroy agree with me. LG 16 refers to a physically invisible case in 2026. This changes the present interpretation of Vatican Council II.
The books on Vatican Council II by Rino Fisichella and Fr. Antonio Spadaro sj were written with the common Irrational Premise. They agree.

Also the books, articles and talks on Vatican Council II by Cardinals Muller, Burke, Sarah and those of Archbishop Lefebvre, Romano Amerio, Plinio Correa D’Oliveira, Michael Davies, Christopher Ferrara and Fr. Nicholas Gruner are obsolete. So also , Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano and bishops Eleganti, Fellay and Gallaratta and Fr. James Martin sj, They were based upon the Fake and not Rational Premise. They would agree. It is the same with Bishop Robert Barron, Larry Chapp and Mark Lambert.
The Anglican Ordinariate also has been interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational premise, irrational inference and non traditional conclusion.
With the Rational Premise Vatican Council II has ‘returned’ to pre-Vatican Council II times. The Catholic Church of the future has to be traditional. It has to reject ‘the liberal reforms’ of Vatican Council II, irrational.
There is no change in faith and morals, mission, ecclesiology, ecumenism, religious liberty and traditional collegiality.
With Vatican Council II rational, all Apostolic Visitations will be Feeneyite and not Cushingite.
All bishops ordained will be traditional and no more progressivist.
Priests who do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally would be in schism with the Magisterium of the Middle Ages, the Church Fathers and the Apostles. There will be an apostolic break.
Cardinals Ratzinger, Kasper, Semeraro and Archbishop Bruno Forte books on ecclesiology are now obsolete. They were written with the False Premise. Morally, the Council must only be interpreted rationally. Books on Vatican Council II published by Ignatius , Amazon, Oxford University, Angelus and the Sophia Press, need to be phased out.
New books on Vatican Council II have to be written with the rational premise, inference and traditional conclusion.
Pope Leo, the cardinals and bishops are not magisterial and apostolic with the interpretation of Vatican Council II irrational- but only when they choose the Rational Premise and so the traditional conclusion.
The Holy See Press Office does not issue a Press Release saying Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a physically visible case in 2026 and so Lionel Andrades is wrong. They support me. – Lionel Andrades

10.03.2026
NOW THAT POPE LEO AND THE CARDINALS AGREE THAT LG 16 IS HYPOTHETICAL AND SO VC2 IS TRADITIONAL THE SSPX WITH TRADITION CANNOT BE IN SCHISM
NOW THAT POPE LEO AND THE CARDINALS AGREE THAT …

10.03.2025
POPE LEO AND THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS AGREE WITH ME: VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ALIGNED WITH THE ROMAN MISSAL OF THE LATIN MASS
POPE LEO AND THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS AGREE …

09.03.2026
VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ALIGNED WITH FEENEYITE EENS AND THE ROMAN MISSAL: NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

VATICAN COUNCIL II IS ALIGNED WITH FEENEYITE …

04.03.2026
CARDINAL FERNANDEZ IS STILL NOT INFORMING THE SSPX: WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL THE COUNCIL IS TRADITIONAL AND NOT LIBERAL
CARDINAL FERNANDEZ IS STILL NOT INFORMING THE …
7279
Lionel Leslie Andrades links to this post
Anthony November

I really don’t understand you. You post a lot on this platform. But you speak as if this visible vs invisible distinction is the only issue with the VII council. How does solving this make every thing else fall into place?

  • Report
Lionel Leslie Andrades

It is at the heart of the problem in the Church. With invisible baptism of desire (LG 14) there are no excplicit exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, of the Council of Florence 1442. There are no exceptions for Tradition.
Now LG 14 and LG 16 ( being saved in invincible ignorance) are projected as explicit exceptions for EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the rest of Tradition. So the Syllabus of Pius IX and the Catechism of Pius X are made obsolete.Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition. It is a 'revolution' in the Church.
But when LG 14 and 16 etc are implicit and not explicit, then Ad Gentes 7 is aligned wih EENS and the rest of Tradition and LG 8, 14, 16 are not exceptions. So Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and traditional with AG 7 and it is not schismatic with the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
So the liberals can no more cite the Council to justify Amoris Laetitia, the LGBT agenda etc. The Church once again becomes traditional since Vatican Council II has become traditional. Cardinal Cupich and Cardinal Fernandez must affirm the dogma EENS with no exceptions or they continue to remain in public schism on the Athanasius Creed etc.
So it is important how we interpret LG 14 and LG 16 , is it visible and an exception for EENS and Tradition or is it invisible and so not a break with Tradition. Of course, they are invisible cases. So the Council supports the Roman Missal at the Latin Mass and not the ecclesiology of the synods.

  • Report
Lionel Leslie Andrades

Even bishops Fellay and Galaratta of the SSPX agree with me. What about you ? Does Lumen Gentium 16, being saved in invincible ignorance , refer to an invisible case in 2026 for you ? If your answer is YES then you also are on the same wavelength.

  • Report
yuca2111

If fellay agrees i have no problem, what I have a problem is people associating with false prophets like "no one have the entire truth" antipope Leo. Even false prophets say chocolate is sweet, but to me everything they say is blah, blah to me.

  • Report
Lionel Leslie Andrades

You have not answered the question. For Pope Leo and Bishop Fellay Lumen Gentium 16 being saved in invincible ignorance refers to a physically invisble case. Also for you ?

  • Report
yuca2111

A false prophet agrees with you?

  • Report
Login
Create accountForgot password?