POPE LEO AGREES WITH ME: AG 7 IS ALIGNED WITH EENS . LG 16 IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR EITHER.VC2 IS DOGMATIC (AG 7/EENS) AND ECCLESIOCENTRIC (AG7/EENS).
POPE LEO AGREES WITH ME: AG 7 IS ALIGNED WITH EENS . LG 16 IS NOT AN EXCEPTION FOR EITHER. VC2 IS DOGMATIC (AG 7/EENS) AND ECCLESIOCENTRIC (AG7/EENS).
Pope Leo is aligned doctrinally with the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012.
ONE QUESTION
The pope would agree with the traditionalists. He has to be asked only one question. His reply will be “Yes”. Pope Leo simply has to be asked, “Does Lumen Gentium 16 (being saved in invincible ignorance) refer to a hypothetical and invisible case in 2026?” He will reply, “Yes”.
Ask any cardinal the same question .The answer will always be, yes. Ask even a non Catholic or non Christian the same question. The answer will be an obvious-yes.
He cannot meet or see someone now in Heaven saved without faith and baptism and instead in invincible ignorance.
A journalist would clarify, , “Holy Father, when Vatican Council II refers to being saved in invincible ignorance ( I.I ) and the baptism of desire (LG 14), the reference is to a hypothetical and theoretical case only .? It is not a real and known person in 2026? “Yes” will be his answer.
We cannot meet or see someone saved in I.I or BOD this year or the next. This is something obvious. Everyone agrees on this point.
“If anyone is saved outside the Catholic Church as as a Protestant, Jew or Buddhist it can only be known to God?”. Yes.“
“They are not objective, visible exceptions in 2026 for Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II which says all need faith and baptism for salvation?”
When Pope Leo says LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to invisible and hypothetical cases in 2020 it is the end of the New Theology and liberalism in the Church. Cardinals and bishops at the Synods can no more cite Vatican Council II , irrationally, confusing what is invisible as being visible, which makes the conclusion non traditional and ‘ a revolution’ in the Church.
LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are always hypothetical. This is common sense. All agree here.
VC2 ALIGNED WITH SSPX STATEMENT
When the SSPX issued its General Chapter Statement 2012, they should have said that Vatican Council II also agrees with the SPPX doctrinally. The SSPX states, ‘we reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the unique Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation’ 1 and we believe this is the teaching of Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.
So today Pope Leo has to agree that Vatican Council II is dogmatic (AG 7/ EENS) and Ecclesiocentric (AG 7/EENS).This makes him a traditionalist. He is doctrinally aligned with the SSPX General Chapter Statement.
There is no other rational choice.
There is no other moral choice.
M.C PRIESTS AGREE WITH POPE LEO AND THE SSPX
Fr. Ramon Lustiner m.c would agree with Pope Leo.Fr. Ramon is the Filipino Father General of the Missionaries of Charity Contemplative Brothers of Mother Teresa, Rome. It would be the same with Fr. Sebastian Vazhakala m.c, the co-founder of this community with Mother Teresa. For Fr. Sebastian and Gianna Tommasi, the M.C Secretary for M.C Lay Missionaries, LG 14 and LG 16 refer to hypothetical and physically invisible cases in 1965-2026.
It is the same for the M.C Brothers at their center near Largo Preneste, Rome, where I live. The other day, I held a page-sized card, quoting AG 7 and CCC 846, in front of Brother Jayaraj m.c and Brother Barnabas m.c as I began walking outside the M.C gate. They had no objections. They too follow the Council and Catechism.
Even the M.C Superior, Fr.Stephen Yaw Manu m.c, follows the Councils and Catechism. So for him other religions are not paths to salvation (AG 7, CCC 845,846 etc). If anyone is saved through Jesus and the Church (CCC 846) and not with faith and baptism (AG 7) it can only be known to God. The norm in the Church, for salvation, is Catholic faith and the baptism of water. So here we do not have a practical exception for AG 7 and CCC 846(outside the Church there is no salvation).
This is the Magisterial teaching of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally. This is the teaching of the Church. This is the dogmatic teaching of Vatican Council II (AG 7/EENS) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845-846-AG 7 etc).
Fr. Stephen, who is from Ghana, too, would agree with Pope Leo and everyone else i.e. LG 14 and LG 16 refer to hypothetical cases and so are not exceptions for AG 7/EENS in a dogmatic Vatican Council II.
Ask their popular M.C German, preacher and theologian, Father Jan Timo Pavelka mc, and he will say, ‘Yes!’.
“Yes!” had been the response of Brother Richard m.c, many times. He had been studying theology at the Angelicum. He went a few days back to the M.C community in the USA, for some time.
Salvation is open for all in potential. Jesus has died for all, but to receive this salvation from Hell, all need to accept and follow Jesus in the Catholic Church, His Mystical Body - and there are no known exceptions .( Dominus Iesus 20 etc, Pope John Paul II.
The division between the SSPX and Washington ends.
They will all have the same understanding of Vatican Council,Pope Leo and the SSPX.
They all have only one option - the rational and moral one. –Lionel Andrades
1
For this reason it seems opportune that we reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the unique Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation; our faith in its monarchical constitution, desired by Our Lord Himself, by which the supreme power of government over the universal Church belongs only to the Pope, Vicar of Christ on earth; our faith in the universal Kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Creator of both the natural and the supernatural orders, to Whom every man and every society must submit.
Society of St. Pius X General Chapter Statement