SSPX STILL DOES NOT DISCUS DOCTRINE

12.06.2026

SSPX STILL DOES NOT DISCUS DOCTRINE

The Council interpreted rationally supports the traditionalists. The SSPX must ask Pope Leo to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, grant them canonical recognition and approve the ordination of new bishops, since the Council is no more an issue for the traditionalists. They accept Vatican Council II rational, Feeneyite, traditional, ecclesiocentric and interpreted ethically.

Cardinal Fernandez has said that the SSPX is in schism because they do not accept Vatican Council II and its liberal reforms. He means they do not accept Vatican Council II irrational, Cushingite, as he and Pope Leo do. There is no response from the SSPX. There is no press statement on this issue. There is no press conference. They do not discuss doctrine. Vatican Council II was not mentioned in the Declaration of Faith of Fr. Davide Pagliarani.
Even the Ecclesia Dei communities offer the Latin Mass with Cushingism!? So what?
Even Novus Ordo priests offer the Latin Mass with Cushingism, as do the SSPX.
Feeneyism and not Cushingism was the lex orandi of the Catholic Church for centuries before 1949.
The SSPX does not respond to Fernandez since the SSPX too is in doctrinal chaos like the rest of the Church. The SSPX does not have a spokesman who is available to answer questions.
The SSPX priests in Italy do not want to offend Econe. Remember Fr. Chazal, Bishop Williamson... They all did not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and could not discuss this issue.
Fr. Chazal was interviewed recently and was not asked about LG 16 visible. This was a mistake of Archbishop Lefebvre and the bishops he consecrated. Calling a Press Conference, implies, that you have the Faith and are ready to speak about it.
Fr.Pagliarani must be willing to admit that the SSPX made an error on doctrine, when he was the Rector of the SSPX seminary in Argentine. He must be willing to talk about it.
Fr.Pagliarani could call a Press Conference and discuss doctrine. Presently their interpretation of Vatican Council II is as irrational and political as that of Pope Leo and the sedevacantists.
They would have to admit that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, and the bishops he ordained, used the irrational LG 16 visible premise, as did Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger.
Fr. Pagliarani and Fr. Jean Marie Gleize, both Cushingites on Vatican Council II, and the SSPX bishops could answer questions from journalists. I would be willing to ask questions or respond to questions on this issue, in Rome.
Or, organise a Press Conference and I would be willing to answer questions since I have discovered Vatican Council II rational and irrational, the Nicene Creed rational and irrational, the Catechisms traditional or schismatic, Magisterial Documents interpreted ethically or unethically...
-Lionel Andrades
233