The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni,Cardinal Gerhardt Muller, Bishop Robert …

The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni,Cardinal Gerhardt Muller, Bishop Robert Barron, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Fr. Davide Pagliarani, Fr, Jean Marie Gleize, Fr. Michael Mary Sim and Maria Montse Alvarado is Cushingite and not Feeneyite

03.05.2026

The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni,Cardinal Gerhardt Muller, Bishop Robert Barron, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Fr. Davide Pagliarani, Fr, Jean Marie Gleize, Fr. Michael Mary Sim and Maria Montse Alvarado is Cushingite and not Feeneyite

‘Rome comes back to the Faith’ with Vatican Council II Feneeyite and not Vatican Council II Cushingite.
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School (FSCIRE), Ursula Von Layen of the European union, Cardinal Gerhardt Muller, Bishop Robert Barron, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Fr. Davide Pagliarani, Fr, Jean Marie Gleize, Fr. Michael Mary Sim of the Transalpine Redemptorist is Cushingite and not Feeneyite. It is the same with Maria Montserrat Alvarado, the new Prefect of the Vatican's Dicastery for Communication and the EWTN Rome staff.
Creeds interpretd with Cushingism (LG 16 visible in 2026) are heretical and schismatic and a mortal I sin of faith.
With LG 16 visible we have schism with LG 16 invisible Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric and traditional. This is a major doctrinal discovery in the Catholic Church. The liberal Vatican Council II becomes orthodox.

I affirm Vatican Council II. I affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church. I affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed with no known exceptions. I affirm invisible and hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. All the traditionalists can do the same and inform Cardinal Fernandez about this. We reject ‘the liberal reforms’ based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. -Lionel Andrades