THE DIALOGUE. AND THE HOLY WATER…
Filial exhortation to the 500,000 Catholic priests of the Planet, fraternally extended to all Christians!+ Ave Maria!
Prayer for the Church, for peace, for the intentions of Heaven on each of us, has been increasingly motivated for a few days! Dear Leo XIV has various emergencies before Him! The premonitions of the global health dictatorship, constituted by the generalized inoculation of citizens, have had the approval of the Vatican. And from there, the moral responsibility regarding the gene serums derived from fetal tissues has spread like an epidemic to all of Catholicism. The Vatican is not only, but also, a State… with rules. A correction of the Note of 21.12.2020 - Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith would be appropriate, as the assumption of stopping the contagion has been revealed... and very quickly, scientifically incorrect. The Abu Dhabi declaration should be corrected, because it is not true that God wants all religions; it is true that He allows them. The agreement with China should be reviewed, which subordinated the appointment of Catholic bishops to the approval of the communist regime, who should be subject only to Jesus Christ and to the One who validly represents Him as His Vicar.
Leo XIV expressed particular confidence in the synodal journey. But what are the fruits today!? Amoris Laetitia? Which exhorts adulterers to sin again and to commit Eucharistic and confessional sacrileges? Or the Synod of the Amazon! Bishop Prevost was at that Synod, indeed. And he played a significant role. There was talk of introducing Viri Probati, that is, married men, already permanent deacons to be ordained priests to help the few priests to cover the spiritual needs of a large territory like the Amazon. But this is not God's plan! And it would have been the Trojan horse to surreptitiously cancel the celibacy of priests. Fortunately, for now the synod fathers have stopped. And why? Probably also thanks to the book by Cardinal Robert Sarah and Benedict XVI, entitled From the Depths of Our Hearts, 2020. And yet, for the synod fathers... shouldn't the Gospel have been enough? Of course! 1Cor 7,32-34: he who is unmarried worries about pleasing God, but he who is married worries about pleasing his wife, and is divided! ..says St. Paul. We must choose in life! And this is also one of the reasons why the Orthodox, Christians separated for almost 1000 years, will have to come back with us. Cardinal Sarah and Ratzinger write that priestly celibacy is ontological, because it is not so much (and sometimes not only) a natural eunuch (eunuchs by birth). But functional (eunuchs for the Kingdom)! Now, shouldn't the Amazonian synod fathers have known this? And wasn't it enough for them to remember Saint Bridget of Sweden, to whom Our Lady said: the Pope who removes priestly celibacy will go to hell? Obviously not. In times of apostasy the Gospel is discredited and prophecies are despised. And this then... in spite of the letter of the Law: 1 Thessalonians 5:20: ‘do not despise prophecies’. And what does the Lord do then? If necessary, he sends us more. This has been happening for decades… it is a kaleidoscopic flourish of presumed apparitions. Even Cardinal Ratzinger in the famous Report on Faith of 1985 took note of it. Among all, sometimes… Heaven really makes itself present. Prophetically. And isn’t it ultimately… the book by Sarah and Ratzinger prophetic itself? Physiological phenomenology in religion, because in every age Heaven raises witnesses. His Eminence Robert Sarah finds it unbearable that people in the Third World are offered ‘second-class’ priests … that is viri probati, married men ordained priests! On the contrary, the younger a Church is, like Africa, South America, Asia, the more it needs to encounter the radicality of the Gospel. Ordaining married men, even if first permanent deacons, would not be a plausible exception, but rather a breach open to evil, a lie(!), the priesthood correctly understood would be undermined. And in fact, I say, the birth of priestly vocations of celibate priests would be inhibited, even ‘prevented’, says His Emincence. The exception would become a permanent state and would naturally have repercussions on the entire Church. These are very different words (!), from the synodal and synodalist optimism of Leo XIV! St. Paul, still in the area of 1 Corinthians, chapter 7, says: it would be better if you were chaste like me, but if you can’t do it, get married so you don’t have to burn in the flames. And then, when you are married, he adds: unite more, if you can’t be chaste spouses, so you don’t lose the joy of being Christians, in essence. St. Augustine, who had fully experienced life, even emotional life, had a slightly different idea, which I mentally (at least mentally) agree with. Full chastity even between spouses, even if biblically not obligatory, would nevertheless be desirable. And if you look closely, this…and this yes…generates vocations. Because if the culture in which we are immersed at a certain point leads everyone to think intimately like this, then one more easily chooses to become a priest or a nun, since as an alternative one would have few satisfactions to take, and that is, as many as the children one will procreate. Let us remember the parents of Therese of Lisieux, saints! And collaborators, for this reason, of the vocation and to a certain extent also of the sanctity of their daughter. The progressive Amazonian synod fathers were instead taking a completely different direction. In the Letter to the Galatians 1,9-10 it is written: if anyone preaches to you a gospel other than the one you have received, let him be anathema! That is, cursed! because he would no longer be a servant of Christ! Is it perhaps the favor of men that I intend to earn, or rather that of God? This is Saint Paul! Pleasing everyone is not a good sign, Jesus did not please everyone. In short, if it is not wise to be obstinately nice or complacent, it is on the contrary to be firmly spiritual. This is where we are... With great sadness we said goodbye to the passing of Francis and with vibrant emotion to the election of Leo XIV, I had never been so moved as this time. Especially for the non-verbal communication immediately established with us. But then... why am I here and talking so much? Well, this demonstrates one thing: that usually those who count the least are those who talk the most. And that complaints, it is a bit of a law of nature, always go upwards. The complainer, in a singular way, recognizes who is superior to him and turns to him. I am not so important as to deserve timely answers, but I am important enough to ask questions...
To all the priests of the Earth: there are 500,000 of you! Today the world does not have great respect for the sacred. Why is that? Perhaps because in the Mass you no longer consecrate ad Orientem, as you once did, and you hide the tabernacles to the right or left, with all the possible normative excuses, while You sit in the center and not to the side, and yet the Sacrosantum Concilium requires in every detail to recall the primacy of Christ, Guide and Head of the Eucharistic Liturgy and the people, who are simple, end up thinking more of You than of God. If you looked at Him, at least in the salient moments, the faithful would see You, but they would look at Him to whom you would be turned. And they would fear Him more, respecting You better too. And if they didn’t understand something of what you say, in Latin (!)... at least something, that wouldn’t be bad. The Mystery is not a Limit, but a Dam, a Fence, a Refuge. And it brings peace to a humble heart. Instead, what happens? All over the world you delegate your work to the laity. We have always known that touching God with our hands is the prerogative of the consecrated alone. No one else has the right to touch the Eucharist. Except in cases of extreme...extreme necessity, teaches St. Thomas Aquinas. In the Third World this makes sense, therefore...parishioners are tens of kilometers apart. But in the West? And in Italy, then? That there is a church and at least one priest every 2 kilometers? someone will think: but then... is the priest the most important person in society? And this would be beautiful, because the answer is in fact: Yes. And even in heaven this difference will be seen. Dearest priests! Don’t underestimate yourselves! Don’t be anticlerical, you! Delegate to non-consecrated lay people (i.e. not even deacons) to touch God in the Tabernacles before, during and after the Eucharist. It is a mistake, a daily abuse before the eyes of all, even if unaware. Only on Christmas and Easter day perhaps that extreme need to ask for help becomes current. The instruction “Redemptionis Sacramentum” of 25-03-2004, n. 157 reminds us that if there is a sufficient number of sacred ministers for the distribution of Holy Communion, even the lay people who were extraordinarily appointed to this ministry, should abstain. Does the Mass last longer? Maybe… Let us not be taken by the anxiety of the world, the Sacred needs space and time. If the chronos increases by a few minutes, then the Kairòs, the interior time, will also increase to thank Jesus more for the inestimable Gift received! As once the Civitas was physically built around the place of worship, today the Societas is regenerated starting from the Eucharistic liturgy, lived in a congruent way. What St. Thomas told us, in fact, applies not only to those who distribute the Bread of Heaven, but also to those who receive It. Today priests, deacons and non-consecrated lay people distribute the Body of Christ on the hands (!!!) of the faithful. A diabolical thing. But how does that come to mind? The Marian apparitions that speak of it… are clear on this. And unanimous! And note: often to mystics who can barely read and write, very profound theological treasures are communicated and on this subject also in full harmony with the almost two-thousand-year-old ecclesiastical practice begun with Innocent I, also canonized. Who resolved… and once and for all… precisely this dispute. On your knees and in your mouth is the correct way! Even Jesus prayed kneeling on the morning of the Resurrection. And in the Heavenly Jerusalem angels and redeemed humanity are shown kneeling, even on their faces, while they adore the Lamb! And is not the Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the World, the very One we eat in the Holy Mass? You will tell me: these are orders from above. True! But yours is not obedience, it is a conformism that undermines the unity between us and greatly disturbs the peace of creation, because it distorts the relationship between the self and God, between heaven and earth! Some recent prophecies report that women should not be on the altar during the liturgy. And even Blessed Edwige Carboni received indications from Heaven that in the plans of the Most High the role of women in the world is not what it has today (and it was the 1940s when He spoke to her, do you realize, yes?). These revelations are in tune with a centuries-old History. Which apparently… will have to return. Just like the veil for women at Mass, a beautiful thing. And right. Finally today in the parishes you grant the Eucharist to adulterers and concubines, which everyone recognizes. There are no particular cases that are an exception! The graduality of the Law cannot be done, said Saint John Paul II. You remember that, right!? These people do not have the right to such liturgical legitimacy for another reason too. The worst mortal sins, if they are also public, known to all, also become a scandal for creatures!!! as well as for the Creator and offend in a broad sense the fifth commandment! Because they attack the innocence and spiritual life of good people, who see justified a behavior that they instead religiously and sometimes even laboriously… fight. We should ask ourselves: what do we believe in? The priest is not a profession. It is more important. We must not be arrogant! We cannot act like the eternal fathers! It is useful to remind those who command the Church now, that two months before the end of the Second Vatican Council, almost 500 Council Fathers signed a petition to condemn communism, which is the putative father of ecclesiastical progressivism (and not only that), but they were ignored. And the spirit of the Council, to which even if merely pastoral a blind obedience is constantly asked, was born perhaps from a solemn, premeditated disobedience. One morning in 1962, a progressive French archbishop asked to speak but was told, according to the rules, that no discussions were scheduled at that moment. So he nonchalantly stood up and spoke anyway. And from that moment, the meeting that in the intentions of the Good Pope was supposed to last a year, lasted for three years. And that day was, look at that, October 13, the date of Fatima, an apparition whose message certainly has to do with the Apostasy within the Church! From the Council emerged over time the changes in the Holy Mass and those false theories on the sacraments, on the Eucharist, on marriage, on the priesthood and on the doctrine... just as the Lady of All Nations had told the visionary of Amsterdam. To the Catholic faithful, therefore, I advise: if you can... take communion on your knees and on the mouth only before the consecrated Priest, religious or deacon. Not from the others! And to the priests to do everything to distribute Jesus in their masses exclusively according to the universal law.
It is written: In the name of Jesus Christ every knee should bend!
I confidently await the proclamation of the fifth Marian dogma!
Mary Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix and Advocate! To Her I entrust my words, my misery, your intentions, everything! Amen