The diocese of Charlotte will continue to take a beating with the Lefebvre-Kwasniewski-Vigano interpretation of Vatican Council II
24.10.2025THE BISHOP MUST USE THE L.A INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IN CHARLOTTE : 95 QUESTIONS ANS ANSWERS (UPDATED)
95. The diocese of Charlotte will continue to take a beating with the Lefebvre-Kwasniewski-Vigano interpretation of Vatican Council II ?
Yes the diocese of Charlotte will continue to take a beating with the Lefebvre-Kwasniewski-Vigano interpretation of Vatican Council II. The Latin Mass groups in Charlotte must continue to affirm Tradition of the Roman Missal but they must avoid the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the bishop and Lefebvre-Kwasniewski and Vigano.
Without this common interpretation the bishop cannot demand an end of the Latin Mass. The bishop will know that the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal is contradicted by Vatican Council II as interpreted by Lefebvre and the sedevacantist bishops Sanborn and Pivarunas.
Canonically and legally to remain a bishop, he must affirm Vatican Council II rationally like me and also affirm the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal, like me.
So at the Novus Ordo Mass he must affirm the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal and the Council and Catechism interpreted only rationally.
I would tell the bishop to inform the people in his diocese that presently they interpret Vatican Council II with an irrational premise and inference. I avoid this error. The Curia is not Catholic when they state that LG 16 refers to a visible person in 2025 and so they infer that LG 16 is a visible exception for the dogma EENS. There is no such known person. Yet this is the foundation for the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, by the bishop and curia in Charlotte. The newspapers and TV do not know this.
The Latin Mass groups can dialogue with the bishop 1) inform him about the L.A interpretation of Vatican Council II and the 95 questions and Answers ( updated ) on Gloria TV.
It is important to note that with the Lefebvre, new theology, they are telling the bishop:-
1. T1. The Latin Mass groups reject Vatican Council II and so are in schism.
2. T2. The Roman Missal, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and Syllabus of Errors are contradicted by Vatican Council II which the bishop and the congregation affirm-.
Instead the Latin Mass groups and Kwasniewski and Vigano must tell the bishop in Charlotte:
1 The bishop is in schism since he rejects Vatican Council II. rational and the Catechism (rational).
3. T2.The Roman Missal and Tradition in general are aligned with Vatican Council II (rational).
4. the Catechisms ( rational). But the Creeds(ir-rational) asheld by the bishop and Curia in Charlotte, is not apostolic and magisterial.
The Missal of Pope Paul VI which is good and appreciated is not aligned with the exclusivist ecclesiology, the ecclesiocentrism of the Roman Missal, and in general the Creeds, Council and Catechisms, interpreted rationally..
So the bishop would come across as a modernist.
Charges of heresy and schism are a scandal.
The rejection of the Athanasius Creed, in the original in public, is heresy and schism.
He can change all this by interpreting LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, rationally and so in harmony with the Tradition of the Latin Mass groups. He would no more be a liberal. - Lionel Andrades
21.10.2025
MUSLIMS WHO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY ONLY ARE ALLOWED TO STUDY AT CATHOLIC PONTIFICAL UNIVERSITIES : 93 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
94. Muslim imams and professors at European secular and pontifical universities?
Bishop Hermann Glettler of Innsbruck, Austria, rejoices in the training of Muslim Imams at the Catholic university, says the head line on Gloria TV. Muslims are allowed to study at the pontifical universities. They also can study philosophy and theology and then teach it to Catholics and others The condition is that they must interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents irrationally. In this way they produce a fake break with Catholic Tradition, which is approved by the political-left.
On the other hand I am not allowed to study philosophy or theology at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas and the Pontifical Regina Apostolorum University, Rome. I affirm Vatican Council II, rational which is in harmony with the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and all the Catechisms on outside the Church there being no salvation.
At the Giorgio La Pira Library and Research Center in Palermo, of the FSCIRE the writings of religious leaders of the Taliban, Jamat e Islamic, Jamiat e Ulema e Islam, Pakistan, Anjuman Khatm Nabuvat, Pakistan etc are available in Palermo.It is approved by the European Union. Some of the Muslim religious leaders, whose writing are available at this library in Palermo could be labeled terrorist, a few years back. They support the persecution of the Ahmediyya sect in Lahore, Pakistan. The Ahmediyyas, who consider themselves Muslim, but Mohammad is not the last prophet for them, believe that the tomb of Jesus is in Kashmir and Ahmediyas make a pilgrimage to the Roza Bal. The Ahmediyyas, also known as Qadianis are missionary. They are persecuted and many are killed for preaching their religion in Pakistan.Many are in jail under the Blasphemy Laws.
The FSCIRE of Alberto Melloni which supports this library, interprets Vatican Council II irrationally. So the FSCIRE ( Bologna School) funded by the Italian Government, projects Vatican Council II as a liberal break with Catholic Tradition.
Dr Adnane Mokrani is a Muslim theologian, Professor of Islamic Studies at the Pontifical Gregorian University (PUG) in Rome and Senior Fellow at the Fondazione per le scienze religiose (FSCIRE) and the Giorgio La Pira Library and Research Center in Palermo. He was a former Professor at the Pontifical Institute for Arabic and Islamic Studies (PISAI) in Rome (2009-2020). He holds a PhD in Muslim-Christian Relations from PISAI. He interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, like the professors of the Gregorian University and PISAI. So was probably eligible for scholarships from Propaganda Fide, Vatican. Mine was discontinued. I affirmed the dogma EENS which is not contradicted by Vatican Council II which I interpret rationally.- Lionel Andrades
60. Vatican Council II indicates Mohammad is lost forever and Muslims in general, are going to the same place?
Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation. All. Mohammad died without Catholic faith and the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. Vatican Council II indicates that he is lost forever just as Dante saw him in inferno. So the Catholic Church’s teaching on Islamism, before and after Vatican Council II, has not changed.
Jesus is the only Savior of the world, God wants all to be untied in the Catholic Church (CCC 845), the Catholic Church is like the only Ark of Noah that saves in the flood (CCC 845), outside the Church there is no salvation (CCC 846).
The Quran has insufficiencies, error and superstition (Dominus Iesus, Pope John Paul II).
Dante saw Mohammad in Hell for founding a new religion which was not the will of God. Mohammadans are oriented to Hell, the popes and saints have told us over the centuries, as does the Council and all the Catechisms. – Lionel Andrades
VATICAN COUNCIL II INDICATES MOHAMMAD IS LOST : …
Bishop Glettler Rejoices in Training Muslim Imams at Catholic University
Bishop Glettler Rejoices in Training Muslim …
21.10.2025
CARDINAL VICTOR MANUEL FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM WITH THE FAKE INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II: 93 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
CARDINAL VICTOR MANUEL FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM …
20.10.2025
OBLIGATION FOR CARDINALS GRECH, AND HOLLERICH AND BISHOPS BATZING AND BODE TO AFFIRM VATICAN COUNCIL II: CANONICAL ISSUE: 92 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (UPDATED)
OBLIGATION FOR CARDINALS GRECH, AND HOLLERICH …