LIST OF PRIESTS NEEDED WHO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY ALIGNED WITH THE ROMAN MISSAL AND TRADITION
16.01.2026LIST OF PRIESTS NEEDED WHO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY ALIGNED WITH THE ROMAN MISSAL AND TRADITION
Latin Mass groups must make films and publish articles which show there is a new discovery within the Catholic Church which supports the Roman Missal and the Latin Mass and not Pope Leo and cardinals Roche and Fernandez.
THE FILM
The film, like the one on Charlotte, North Carolina, mentions the closure or restrictions on the Latin Mass. This is being done by bishops who interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and so unethically. They also support new versions of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, which make obsolete the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal at the Latin Mass. It creates exceptions for also the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX. This is public heresy and schism since now it is known that Magisterial Documents can be re-interpreted rationally and the conclusion is orthodox.All this was not mentioned on the original film on Charlotte.
Since Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and so the conclusion is traditional, then from where does the bishop in Charlotte get his liberalism at the Novus Ordo Mass in English?
1. Vatican Council II.
2. Catechism of the Catholic Church
3.1949 Letter of the Holy Office.
4. Catechism of Pope Pius X.
5. Athanasius Creed, Nicene Creed and Apostles Creed interpreted rationally.
For the bishop in Charlotte ‘the red is an exception for the blue’. But not for me, Lionel.
For the Latin Mass groups in Charlotte ‘the red is an exception for the blue.’ But ‘the red is not an exception for the blue for me.’
For the SSPX chapel in Charlotte,’ the red is an exception for the blue’. It is the same for the bishop’.
But this is schism with the Magisterium of for example, the 16th century. They interpreted all Magisterial Documents with ‘the red not being an exception for the blue.’
So how can there be a bishop in Charlotte, who interprets Church Documents irrationally (see graphics) and has not denied it? This is a scandal.
The bishop must affirm the Athanasius Creed for example, which is aligned with Ad Gentes 7 and not contradicted by LG 8, 14, 16 etc.
He must affirm the dogma EENS which is not contradicted by invisible cases of LG 14 (the baptism of desire).
At the Novus Ordo Mass he must say outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation ( CCC 845,846, Catechism of Pope Pius X 24Q, 27Q etc) with no exceptions in real life and none mentioned in Vatican Council II.
Canonically, the bishop is expected to affirm de fide teachings in public. He must be a Catholic and not be in schism with the past Magisterium, which is supported by Vatican Council II, rational.
There cannot be a lex orandi in Charlotte based upon Vatican Council II, irrational.
In short: How can the present bishop remain at Charlotte?
He must interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally like Lionel Andrades.
He must interpret LG 14 and LG 16 rationally. So they are no more new versions of the Creeds etc. Lionel Andrades interprets LG 14 and LG 16 rationally. So there is no change in the Creeds.Now it is the same schism in San Antonio, Tyler, Fort Worth and Detroit…
How can the USCCB bishops oppose Tradition with the irrational version of Vatican Council II?
Why must we attend Holy Mass offered by a USCCB bishop who does not affirm the Creeds in the original and interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally?
Can we have a list of priests who interpret Vatican Council II rationally and in harmony with the Roman Missal and Tradition ?-Lionel Andrades