en.news

Ignorance or Bad Faith - on Leo XIV's Reception of Mrs Mullally

On 28 April, Don Nicola Bux, a liturgist close to Benedict XVI, commented on MessaInLatino.it regarding Leo XIV’s audience for Mrs Sarah Mullaly, who holds the title and costume of Archbishop of Canterbury. His text:

"There is a contradiction between the many Anglican pastors who have become Catholic priests and been incardinated into the ordinariates established by Benedict XVI, and the Pope’s message of good wishes delivered by Cardinal Koch to Sarah Mullaly, who is not a bishop because she is a woman and is not the Primate of Canterbury, as two-thirds of the Anglican Communion does not recognise her as such.'

What about the secretary of the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity, Monsignor Flavio Pace, who makes the sign of the cross while the Anglican bishop' imparts a blessing in the Clementine Chapel at the tomb of St Peter?

Did Koch and Pace not realise the falsity of their actions?

Whether out of ignorance or bad faith, they scandalise and confuse many Catholics and require clarification from the Vatican."

#newsHvodfdiugn
7878

Robert Prevost maliciously trampled upon the male priesthood and the papacy—instituted by Christ—while wearing the mask of so-called "ecumenical dialogue." Saint Alphonsus Liguori teaches that when a priest sins, he does so out of malice, and his sin is equivalent to that of the apostate angels. Furthermore, this approach is unbiblical; for, while Jesus commanded us to go forth and preach the Good News of the Gospel, He did not instruct us to persist in pleading with obstinate heretics. Regarding the heretic, Scripture tells us that, after two admonitions, we must turn away from him, for he is perverted and stands condemned by his own rejection of the Gospel. He has rejected the Holy Spirit.
What Jesus taught us is that if someone does not receive the Gospel of Christ, we must shake the dust from our feet; for obstinacy is a sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit—it is a rejection of the Grace that God offers to those willing to repent and amend their ways, not to those who defy God.
Can you imagine if the adulterous woman had persisted in her adultery after being admonished to sin no more? Yet, Prevost’s sect sacrilegiously "blesses" the adulterous woman’s concubine, justifying this action with the argument that everyone has a place within Bergoglio’s sect—lying brazenly, since Scripture clearly affirms that unrepentant adulterers and homosexuals face condemnation.

Under the pontificate of Pope Benedict XVI (March 6, 2010), the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith broke with the Anglicans:
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
The decision of the Church of England to permit the ordination of women bishops was a step which would have a serious negative impact on full union with the Church
Pontifical Council for promoting Christian unity
The Anglicans themselves requested to put a hold on the meetings geared toward their full union with the Catholic Church in order to bless unions between persons of the same sex

The Anglican sect has demonstrated that they possess the element of obstinacy in heresy, and they persist in their schism and apostasy.

john333

Walmart greeter has more charism then this bunch

rhemes1582

Does Ignorance mean direction nowadays?

There is not even the possibility of ignorance that excuses their betrayal, since this implies that they lack the necessary qualifications for the office they usurp. Prevost, Tagle, Koch, and Flavio Pace and the other minions have committed a sin of malice. They are apostates and are not in communion with the Catholic Church, as established by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith itself— under the pontificate of John Paul II—wherein it is specified that priests take an oath of profession of faith, and where it is clearly taught that Anglican orders are invalid and null. The Church has indicated that this heretical sect lacks apostolic succession. Furthermore, that same decree states: "15 Whoever denies these truths would be in a position of rejecting a truth of Catholic doctrine 16 and would therefore no longer be in full communion with the Catholic Church."
Pope Leo XIII’s 1896, Apostolicae Curae: Anglican orders are “absolutely null and utterly void”

Ignorance? Couldn't he think of a better way how to deceive himself and give excuse for this evil?