As I wrote before, the dogs and cat have more episcopal authority than the female imposter.
The impossibility of ordaining a woman to the episcopacy, or the priesthood stems from the very nature of the Sacrament of Holy Orders as instituted by Christ. Just as a frog, a rock, or a pony cannot receive this sacrament due to their inherent nature, so too a woman, lacking the requisite nature of a male, is incapable of receiving it. Any attempt to ordain a woman would be not only invalid but also a sacrilege, a profanation of a sacred rite. The sacrament would simply not take effect, as it would lack the necessary "matter," the proper subject capable of receiving it. This defect in the subject, being female rather than male, constitutes an insurmountable impediment. The Church, in her unchanging fidelity to the Apostolic Tradition, has always understood, since time immemorial in both East and West, that the one to be ordained must be a vir baptizatus probus, a baptized man of proven character, as reflected in the traditional understanding of Canon Law. This is not a matter of discrimination, but a recognition of the divine institution of the sacrament of Holy Orders by Our Lord Jesus Christ Himself. Mary was present at the first episcopal ordinations on Holy Thursday. Our Lord did not ordain her. End of story. Remember that the priest stands in "the person of Christ"...a woman is incapable of standing in the place of a man despite any modernity "woke-ness" bias to the contrary.
They don't care about validity anymore.
O Sacrament Unholy | Articles: Benedict XVI Heresies and Errors | Traditional Latin Mass Resources