Article by @Gaetano Masciullo Regarding LGBT issues and female diaconate, Leo XIV alternates between openness and caution, suggesting doctrine could eventually change but not soon. He applies a similar strategy to the Traditional Latin Mass, acknowledging polarization but avoiding definitive decisions, while framing resistance as ideological. Overall, the book portrays Leo XIV as a pope navigating tensions between tradition and reform, offering careful, often ambiguous responses. His style blends continuity with Francis’s methods and cautious distancing, leaving open questions about the true direction of his papacy.
Prevost did not confirm Catholic doctrine; on the contrary, he questioned the dogma of the immutability and infallibility of the Church. Ambiguity is the language of evil. And instead of condemning Bergoglio's entire pamphlet that allows the blessing of the sin of sodomy, he cunningly cited Fiducia Supplicans to normalize it, criticizing it as not a liturgical ritual. Just as Bergoglio did in Argentina, who, while defending homosexual civil unions and gay adoptions, cunningly argued to cover up his betrayal that they could not be equated with the Sacrament of Marriage, which was between a man and a woman.