en.news


Una Voce clarifies why traditional Latin Mass pilgrims were denied access to St. Peter’s Basilica.

The International Federation Una Voce (FIUV) has issued today a statement correcting misunderstandings surrounding this year’s Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage to Rome.

According to FIUV, the Vatican Secretariat of State rejected the organizers’ request to celebrate the traditional Latin Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica in August.

The organizers then sought permission for a collective devotion inside the Basilica, as had been permitted in 2023 and 2024 despite the refusal of Mass.

That request was also rejected in a letter dated September 30, which reached the organizers only in October.

Thus, pilgrims were denied not only Mass in St. Peter’s, but also permission for organized communal prayer inside the Basilica.

Meanwhile, permission was granted for a Pontifical Low Mass at the Basilica of St. Mary Major.

Una Voce thanked the Cardinal Archpriest, sacristans, security personnel, and Dominican confessors for their assistance and hospitality.

Other information on the Pilgrimage

Additional details supplement the FIUV statement: Permission for Mass had already been requested in December, during Bishop Athanasius Schneider’s audience with Pope Leo XIV.

The negative response from the Secretariat of State arrived only on August 7. No alternative date was suggested.

On September 8, Father Claude Barthe, the Pilgrimage’s chaplain, asked the Secretariat of State whether pilgrims could enter the Basilica to pray at St. Peter’s tomb: “May we nevertheless, on the coming 24 October, enter the Basilica in procession, pray for the Pope at the Confession, and adore the Blessed Sacrament at the Altar of the Chair? The Basilica’s sacristy informs us that this would be possible at 1 p.m., should Your Excellency grant us the necessary permission.”

The negative response, dated September 30, was sent by post to the Apostolic Nunciature in Paris and reached Father Barthe only on October 12, less than two weeks before the Pilgrimage.

The organizers continued trying in vain to obtain permission for the group to enter the Basilica.

#newsGuvhznqhwf
32K

The hatred of the wolf dressed in white toward the Catholic tradition is immeasurable.

Full statement
“Many members and supporters take part in the pilgrimage and we as an organisation are a member of the Caetus Internationalis Summorum Pontificum; we regard the annual pilgrimage as having great significance for the movement for the Traditional Mass. We would like to correct some misunderstandings which have arisen over the organisation of the pilgrimage this year. The authorities (through the Secretariat of State) declined the Coetus’ request for the celebration of Mass in St Peter’s, in August. At that point it was hoped and assumed that it would nevertheless be possible to have a collective devotion of some kind for the pilgrims, in St Peter’s, as happened in 2023 and 2024 when permission for Mass was refused. The August letter did not rule this out, so the Coetus requested it. This request was refused in a letter dated 30th September, which was however not received by the organisers until well into October. In the meantime permission was sought and gained for a Prelatial (Pontifical) Low Mass in St Mary Major. The Coetus was privileged to be allowed a Mass there on a Saturday, which is not normally allowed for pilgrim groups. A very reasonable time slot was allocated for this, and Mass ended at about 4:15, as would be expected. The Cardinal Archpriest, the sacristans, and the Basilica security were all very helpful, and we are very grateful to them. The Dominican priests whose role is to hear confessions in the Basilica made themselves available to the pilgrims. We are also grateful to the Lissom Grove choir and to the 1,500 pilgrims who filled this ancient Basilica.”

The Letter from the Secretary of State shows the Ad Petri Sedem procession was refused entry to St Peter’s on 30 September, weeks before the event, yet pilgrims were only told the day before. However the Saint Peter's Sacristy had indicated 1 pm was feasible; Secretariat of State still blocked it.